Descripteur
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (6458)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Accounting for spatiotemporal correlations of GNSS coordinate time series to estimate station velocities / Clément Benoist in Journal of geodynamics, vol 135 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Accounting for spatiotemporal correlations of GNSS coordinate time series to estimate station velocities Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Clément Benoist , Auteur ; Xavier Collilieux
, Auteur ; Paul Rebischung
, Auteur ; Zuheir Altamimi
, Auteur ; Olivier Jamet
, Auteur ; Laurent Métivier
, Auteur ; Kristel Chanard
, Auteur ; Liliane Bel, Auteur
Année de publication : 2020 Projets : GEODESIE / Coulot, David, Université de Paris / Clerici, Christine Article en page(s) : n° 101693 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] corrélation
[Termes IGN] covariance
[Termes IGN] données spatiotemporelles
[Termes IGN] repère de référence terrestre conventionnel
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] vitesseRésumé : (auteur) It is well known that GNSS permanent station coordinate time series exhibit time-correlated noise. Spatial correlations between coordinate time series of nearby stations are also long-established and generally handled by means of spatial filtering techniques. Accounting for both the temporal and spatial correlations of the noise via a spatiotemporal covariance model is however not yet a common practice. We demonstrate in this paper the interest of using such a spatiotemporal covariance model of the stochastic variations in GNSS time series in order to estimate long-term station coordinates and especially velocities.
We provide a methodology to rigorously assess the covariances between horizontal coordinate variations and use it to derive a simple exponential spatiotemporal covariance model for the stochastic variations in the IGS repro2 station coordinate time series. We then use this model to estimate station velocities for two selected datasets of 10 time series in Europe and 11 time series in the USA. We show that coordinate prediction as well as velocity determination from short time series are improved when using this spatiotemporal model, as compared with the case where spatiotemporal correlations are ignored.Numéro de notice : A2020-460 Affiliation des auteurs : Géodésie+Ext (mi2018-2019) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.jog.2020.101693 Date de publication en ligne : 13/01/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2020.101693 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95385
in Journal of geodynamics > vol 135 (April 2020) . - n° 101693[article]Antenna phase center correction differences from robot and chamber calibrations: the case study LEIAR25 / Grzegorz Krzan in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Antenna phase center correction differences from robot and chamber calibrations: the case study LEIAR25 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Grzegorz Krzan, Auteur ; Karol Dawidowicz, Auteur ; Pawel Wielgosz, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] antenne GLONASS
[Termes IGN] antenne GNSS
[Termes IGN] antenne GPS
[Termes IGN] centre de phase
[Termes IGN] chambre anéchoïque
[Termes IGN] correction du signal
[Termes IGN] étalonnage d'instrument
[Termes IGN] instrumentation Leica
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes IGN] robot
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] signal GNSSRésumé : (auteur) In recent years, the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have been intensively modernized, resulting in the introduction of new carrier frequencies for GPS and GLONASS and the development of new satellite systems such as Galileo and BeiDou (BDS). For this reason, the absolute field antenna calibrations performed so far for the two legacy carrier frequencies, the GPS and GLONASS, seem to be insufficient. Hence, all antennas will require a re-calibration of their phase center variations for the new signals to ensure the highest measurement accuracy. Currently, two absolute calibration methods are used to calibrate GNSS antennas: field calibration using a robot and calibration in an anechoic chamber. Unfortunately, differences in these methodologies also result in a disparity in the obtained antenna phase center corrections (PCC). Therefore, we analyze the differences between individual PCC obtained with these two methods, specifically for the Leica AR-25 antenna model (LEIAR25). In addition, the influence of PCC differences on the GNSS-derived position time series for 19 EUREF Permanent GNSS Network (EPN) stations was also assessed. The results show that the calibration method has a noticeable impact on PCC models. PCC differences determined for the ionosphere-free combination may reach up over 20 mm and can be transferred to the position domain. Further tests concerning the positioning accuracy showed that for horizontal coordinates differences between solutions were mostly below 1 mm, exceeding 2 mm only at two stations for the GLONASS solution. However, the height component differences exceeded 5 mm for four, six and six stations out of 19 for the GPS, GLONASS and Galileo solutions, respectively. These differences are strongly dependent on large L2 calibration differences. Numéro de notice : A2020-081 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 Date de publication en ligne : 11/02/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94650
in GPS solutions > vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)[article]Assessment of geocenter motion estimates from the IGS second reprocessing / Yifang Ma in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Assessment of geocenter motion estimates from the IGS second reprocessing Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Yifang Ma , Auteur ; Paul Rebischung
, Auteur ; Zuheir Altamimi
, Auteur ; Weiping Jiang, Auteur
Année de publication : 2020 Projets : 3-projet - voir note / Clerici, Christine Article en page(s) : n° 55 Note générale : bibliographie
This study is supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 41525014) and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC15036).Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] données TLS (télémétrie)
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] mouvement du géocentre
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] variation saisonnière
[Termes IGN] variation temporelleRésumé : (auteur) We investigate geocenter motion time series derived from the combined solutions and six individual analysis center (AC) solutions of the International GNSS Service (IGS) second reprocessing campaign using the network shift approach, in terms of noise content, long-term trends, periodic and aperiodic variations. We assess these GNSS geocenter motion estimates by comparison with independent estimates from satellite laser ranging (SLR). The GNSS geocenter time series exhibit correlated noise which is better represented by a white plus power–law noise model in the X and Y directions, and by a white plus first-order autoregressive (or generalized Gauss–Markov) noise model in the Z direction. The GNSS geocenter time series include expected seasonal variations, but also spurious draconitic signals, particularly in the Z direction. GNSS annual geocenter motion estimates are in reasonable agreement with SLR estimates in the X and Y directions. In the Z direction, however, the annual signals derived from the IGS solutions disagree with SLR estimates, except for three particular ACs. This suggests that the different orbit modeling strategies used by these ACs may constitute an improvement over the conventional strategy employed by the other ACs. The background noise in GNSS and SLR geocenter time series finally appears to be correlated, suggesting that it might partly reflect real, aperiodic geocenter motion. Numéro de notice : A2020-838 Affiliation des auteurs : UMR IPGP-Géod+Ext (2020- ) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-020-0968-2 Date de publication en ligne : 10/03/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0968-2 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=98264
in GPS solutions > vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020) . - n° 55[article]Comparative analysis of different atmospheric surface pressure models and their impacts on daily ITRF2014 GNSS residual time series / Zhao Li in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n°4 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Comparative analysis of different atmospheric surface pressure models and their impacts on daily ITRF2014 GNSS residual time series Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Zhao Li, Auteur ; Chen Wu, Auteur ; Tonie M. van Dam, Auteur ; Paul Rebischung , Auteur ; Zuheir Altamimi
, Auteur
Année de publication : 2020 Projets : 3-projet - voir note / Clerici, Christine Article en page(s) : n° 42 Note générale : bibliographie
This research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Project 2016YFB0502101), the European Commission/Research Grants Council (RGC) Collaboration Scheme sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. E-PolyU 501/16), and the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No. 41525014).Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] coefficient de corrélation
[Termes IGN] données GNSS
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] MERRA
[Termes IGN] modèle atmosphérique
[Termes IGN] pression atmosphérique
[Termes IGN] radar JPL
[Termes IGN] résidu
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] station GNSSRésumé : (auteur) To remove atmospheric pressure loading (ATML) effect from GNSS coordinate time series, surface pressure (SP) models are required to predict the displacements. In this paper, we modeled the 3D ATML surface displacements using the latest MERRA-2 SP grids, together with four other products (NCEP-R-1, NCEP-R-2, ERA-Interim and MERRA) for 596 globally distributed GNSS stations, and compared them with ITRF2014 residual time series. The five sets of ATML displacements are highly consistent with each other, particularly for those stations far away from coasts, of which the lowest correlations in the Up component for all the four models w.r.t MERRA-2 become larger than 0.91. ERA-Interim-derived ATML displacement performs best in reducing scatter of the GNSS height for 90.3% of the stations (89.3% for NCEP-R-1, 89.1% for NCEP-R-2, 86.4% for MERRA and 85.1% for MERRA-2). We think that this may be possibly due to the 4D variational data assimilation method applied. Considering inland stations only, more than 96% exhibit WRMS reduction in the Up direction for all five models, with an average improvement of 3–4% compared with the original ITRF2014 residual time series before ATML correction. Most stations (> 67%) also exhibit horizontal WRMS reductions based on the five models, but of small magnitudes, with most improvements (> 76%) less than 5%. In particular, most stations in South America, South Africa, Oceania and the Southern Oceans show larger WRMS reductions with MERRA-2, while all other four SP datasets lead to larger WRMS reduction for the Up component than MERRA-2 in Europe. Through comparison of the daily pressure variation from the five SP models, we conclude that the bigger model differences in the SP-induced surface displacements and their impacts on the ITRF2014 residuals for coastal/island stations are mainly due to the IB correction based on the different land–sea masks. A unique high spatial resolution land–sea mask should be applied in the future, so that model differences would come from only SP grids. Further research is also required to compare the ATML effect in ice-covered and high mountainous regions, for example the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in China, the Andes in South America, etc., where larger pressure differences between models tend to occur. Numéro de notice : A2020-159 Affiliation des auteurs : Géodésie+Ext (mi2018-2019) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01370-y Date de publication en ligne : 20/03/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01370-y Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94813
in Journal of geodesy > vol 94 n°4 (April 2020) . - n° 42[article]Crowdsource mapping of target buildings in hazard: the utilization of smartphone technologies and geographic services / Mohammad H. Vahidnia in Applied geomatics, vol 12 n° 1 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Crowdsource mapping of target buildings in hazard: the utilization of smartphone technologies and geographic services Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Mohammad H. Vahidnia, Auteur ; Farhad Hosseinali, Auteur ; Maryam Shafiei, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 3 - 14 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géomatique web
[Termes IGN] bâtiment
[Termes IGN] cartographie collaborative
[Termes IGN] données GPS
[Termes IGN] données localisées des bénévoles
[Termes IGN] géocodage
[Termes IGN] gestion de crise
[Termes IGN] instrument embarqué
[Termes IGN] OpenStreetMap
[Termes IGN] secours d'urgence
[Termes IGN] système d'information géographique
[Termes IGN] Téhéran
[Termes IGN] téléphone intelligent
[Termes IGN] web 2.0Résumé : (auteur) Volunteered geographical information (VGI) refers to geographical information that the general public voluntarily collects and shares in the environment instead of for-profit businesses or government entities. Crowdsourcing such information on urgent needs in a disaster can improve the quick emergency responses. This study incorporates the capability of smartphone sensors, GPS, Web 2.0, VGI, and server-based technologies to design and develop a system for collecting target hazard information from volunteers. One of the most important contributions in designing this system is considering the improvement of the positional accuracy of the target buildings based on the position of the mobile device. Several approaches have been recommended for this purpose. The solutions include the use of online map services, geocoding services, and trigonometric methods based on the measurements of sensors such as camera, accelerometer, and magnetic field embedded in a smart mobile phone. The accuracy assessment showed that the trigonometric method by the means of embedded sensors would yield the best result. However, geocoding is more economical in terms of time than other methods. Potentially, the evaluation of the mobile application provided by a group of volunteers showed the overwhelming preference of crowdsource mapping over current telephone communication systems in disaster management. Numéro de notice : A2020-556 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s12518-019-00280-9 Date de publication en ligne : 16/07/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00280-9 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95861
in Applied geomatics > vol 12 n° 1 (April 2020) . - pp 3 - 14[article]Deformation detection through the realization of reference frames / Nestoras Papadopoulos in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 14 n° 2 (April 2020)
PermalinkImpact of temperature stabilization on the strapdown airborne gravimetry: a case study in Central Turkey / Mehmet Simav in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n°4 (April 2020)
PermalinkMonitoring of landslide activity at the Sirobagarh landslide, Uttarakhand, India, using LiDAR, SAR interferometry and geodetic surveys / Ashutosh Tiwari in Geocarto international, vol 35 n° 5 ([01/04/2020])
PermalinkPerformance of Galileo precise time and frequency transfer models using quad-frequency carrier phase observations / Pengfei Zhang in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)
PermalinkA single-receiver geometry-free approach to stochastic modeling of multi-frequency GNSS observables / Baocheng Zhang in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n°4 (April 2020)
PermalinkThe direct geodesic problem and an approximate analytical solution in Cartesian coordinates on a triaxial ellipsoid / Georgios Panou in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 14 n° 2 (April 2020)
PermalinkThe impact of second-order ionospheric delays on the ZWD estimation with GPS and BDS measurements / Shaocheng Zhang in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)
Permalink40 ans de géodésie à l'IGN (Institut Géographique National rebaptisé en 2012 Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière) : 2ème partie, la géodésie physique / Françoise Duquenne in XYZ, n° 162 (mars 2020)
PermalinkLes États-Unis remplacent le NAD83 par le NATRF2022 : ce que cela signifie pour le Canada / Caroline Erickson in Geomatica, vol 74 n° 1 (Mars 2020)
PermalinkEvaluation of the high-rate GNSS-PPP method for vertical structural motion / Mosbeh R. Kaloop in Survey review, vol 52 n° 371 (March 2020)
PermalinkIntegration of remote sensing and GIS to extract plantation rows from a drone-based image point cloud digital surface model / Nadeem Fareed in ISPRS International journal of geo-information, vol 9 n° 3 (March 2020)
PermalinkA line integral approach for the computation of the potential harmonic coefficients of a constant density polyhedron / Olivier Jamet in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkQuels plans de comparaison à Paris avant le nivellement général de la France ? / Alain Coulomb in XYZ, n° 162 (mars 2020)
PermalinkRecent sea level change in the black sea from satellite altimetry and tide gauge observations / Nevin Betül Avsar in ISPRS International journal of geo-information, vol 9 n° 3 (March 2020)
PermalinkResearch on empirical correction models of GPS Block IIF and BDS satellite inter-frequency clock bias / Xiaopeng Gong in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkSmoothing and predicting celestial pole offsets using a Kalman filter and smoother / Jolanta Nastula in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkUsing real polar ground gravimetry data to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery / Biao Lu in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkValidation of marine geoid models by utilizing hydrodynamic model and shipborne GNSS profiles / Sander Varbla in Marine geodesy, Vol 43 n° 2 (March 2020)
PermalinkA breakpoint detection in the mean model with heterogeneous variance on fixed time-intervals / Olivier Bock in Statistics and Computing, vol 29 n° 1 (February 2020)
PermalinkCombinatorial optimization applied to VLBI scheduling / A. Corbin in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n°2 (February 2020)
Permalink