Descripteur
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (6127)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Quantitative assessment of meteorological and tropospheric Zenith Hydrostatic Delay models / Di Zhang in Advances in space research, vol 58 n° 6 (September 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Quantitative assessment of meteorological and tropospheric Zenith Hydrostatic Delay models Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Di Zhang, Auteur ; Jiming Guo, Auteur ; Ming Chen, Auteur ; Junbo Shi, Auteur ; Lv Zhou, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 1033 - 1043 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes IGN] évaluation
[Termes IGN] modèle atmosphérique
[Termes IGN] modèle numérique
[Termes IGN] radiosondage
[Termes IGN] retard troposphérique
[Termes IGN] retard troposphérique zénithal
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (auteur) Tropospheric delay has always been an important issue in GNSS/DORIS/VLBI/InSAR processing. Most commonly used empirical models for the determination of tropospheric Zenith Hydrostatic Delay (ZHD), including three meteorological models and two empirical ZHD models, are carefully analyzed in this paper. Meteorological models refer to UNB3m, GPT2 and GPT2w, while ZHD models include Hopfield and Saastamoinen. By reference to in-situ meteorological measurements and ray-traced ZHD values of 91 globally distributed radiosonde sites, over a four-years period from 2010 to 2013, it is found that there is strong correlation between errors of model-derived values and latitudes. Specifically, the Saastamoinen model shows a systematic error of about −3 mm. Therefore a modified Saastamoinen model is developed based on the “best average” refractivity constant, and is validated by radiosonde data. Among different models, the GPT2w and the modified Saastamoinen model perform the best. ZHD values derived from their combination have a mean bias of −0.1 mm and a mean RMS of 13.9 mm. Limitations of the present models are discussed and suggestions for further improvements are given. Numéro de notice : A2016-593 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.055 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.055 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81750
in Advances in space research > vol 58 n° 6 (September 2016) . - pp 1033 - 1043[article]Accuracy assessment of NOAA coastal change analysis program 2006 - 2010 land cover and land cover change data / John W. McCombs in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS, vol 82 n° 9 (September 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Accuracy assessment of NOAA coastal change analysis program 2006 - 2010 land cover and land cover change data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : John W. McCombs, Auteur ; Shan G. Burkhalter, Auteur ; Christopher D. Robinson, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 711 - 718 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Photo-interprétation
[Termes IGN] analyse diachronique
[Termes IGN] couvert végétal
[Termes IGN] détection de changement
[Termes IGN] Etats-Unis
[Termes IGN] image Landsat
[Termes IGN] littoral
[Termes IGN] niveau d'analyseRésumé : (Auteur) A new approach to locating accuracy assessment sample units was used to quantify 2010 land cover accuracy, in addition to being able to make statements about 2006-2010 land cover change mapping accuracy for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP) data. Three customized tiers of sampling strata were created, as discussed, to meet these goals. Stratified random sampling was employed in each stratum with a six out of nine pixel-homogeneity criteria (different from the final minimum mapping unit) required for each sampling unit. Accuracy was assessed for nine regions in the coastal United States with overall accuracy ranging from 82.3 percent to 85.6 percent. Binary change was mapped with 88.7 percent accuracy, with the largest error being errors of commission (71.2 percent user accuracy). This sampling design also allowed for the identification of 137 locations where true change was not mapped, allowing for statements to be made about missed change. Numéro de notice : A2016-741 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.14358/PERS.82.9.711 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.82.9.711 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=82277
in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS > vol 82 n° 9 (September 2016) . - pp 711 - 718[article]A conventional value for the geoid reference potential W0 / L. Sánchez in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 9 (September 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A conventional value for the geoid reference potential W0 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : L. Sánchez, Auteur ; Robert Cunderlik, Auteur ; N. Dayoub, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 815 - 835 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes IGN] champ de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes IGN] données GOCE
[Termes IGN] données GRACE
[Termes IGN] force de gravitation
[Termes IGN] géoïde terrestre
[Termes IGN] potentiel de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes IGN] surface de la mer
[Termes IGN] télémétrie laser sur satelliteRésumé : (auteur) W0 is defined as the potential value of a particular level surface of the Earth’s gravity field called the geoid. Since the most accepted definition of the geoid is understood to be the equipotential surface that coincides with the worldwide mean ocean surface, a usual approximation of W0 is the averaged potential value WS at the mean sea surface. In this way, the value of W0 depends not only on the Earth’s gravity field modelling, but also on the conventions defining the mean sea surface. W0 computations performed since 2005 demonstrate that current published estimations differ by up to −2.6 m2 s−2 (corresponding to a level difference of about 27 cm), which could be caused by the differences in the treatment of the input data. The main objective of this study is to perform a new W0 estimation relying on the newest gravity field and sea surface models and applying standardised data and procedures. This also includes a detailed description of the processing procedure to ensure the reproducibility of the results. The following aspects are analysed in this paper: (1) sensitivity of the W0 estimation to the Earth’s gravity field model (especially omission and commission errors and time-dependent Earth’s gravity field changes); (2) sensitivity of the W0 estimation to the mean sea surface model (e.g., geographical coverage, time-dependent sea surface variations, accuracy of the mean sea surface heights); (3) dependence of the W0 empirical estimation on the tide system; and (4) weighted computation of the W0 value based on the input data quality. Main conclusions indicate that the satellite-only component (n=200) of a static (quasi-stationary) global gravity model is sufficient for the computation of W0. This model should, however, be based on a combination of, at least, satellite laser ranging (SLR), GRACE and GOCE data. The mean sea surface modelling should be based on mean sea surface heights referring to a certain epoch and derived from a standardised multi-mission cross-calibration of several satellite altimeters. We suggest that the uncertainties caused by geographically correlated errors, including shallow waters in coastal areas and sea water ice content at polar regions should be considered in the computation of W0 by means of a weighed adjustment using the inverse of the input data variances as a weighting factor. This weighting factor should also include the improvement provided by SLR, GRACE and GOCE to the gravity field modelling. As a reference parameter, W0 should be time-independent (i.e., quasi-stationary) and it should remain fixed for a long-term period (e.g., 20 years). However, it should have a clear relationship with the mean sea surface level (as this is the convention for the realisation of the geoid). According to this, a suitable recommendation is to adopt a potential value obtained for a certain epoch as the reference value W0 and to monitor the changes of the mean potential value at the sea surface WS. When large differences appear between W0 and WS (e.g., >±2 m2 s−2), the adopted W0 may be replaced by an updated (best estimate) value. In this paper, the potential value obtained for the epoch 2010.0 (62,636,853.4 m2 s−2) is recommended as the present best estimate for the W0 value. It differs −2.6 m2 s−2 from the so-called IERS W0 value (62,636,856.0 m2 s−2), which corresponds to the best estimate available in 1998. Numéro de notice : A2016-655 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81857
in Journal of geodesy > vol 90 n° 9 (September 2016) . - pp 815 - 835[article]Incorporating movement in species distribution models: how do simulations of dispersal affect the accuracy and uncertainty of projections? / Paul Holloway in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 30 n° 9-10 (September - October 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Incorporating movement in species distribution models: how do simulations of dispersal affect the accuracy and uncertainty of projections? Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Paul Holloway, Auteur ; Jennifer A. Miller, Auteur ; Simon Gillings, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 2050 - 2074 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Analyse spatiale
[Termes IGN] Aves
[Termes IGN] changement climatique
[Termes IGN] distribution spatiale
[Termes IGN] Grande-Bretagne
[Termes IGN] habitat d'espèce
[Termes IGN] incertitude des données
[Termes IGN] modèle de dispersion
[Termes IGN] système d'information géographiqueRésumé : (Auteur) Species distribution models (SDMs) are one of the most important GIScience research areas in biogeography and are the primary means by which the potential effects of climate change on species’ distributions and ranges are investigated. Dispersal is an important ecological process for species responding to changing climates, however, SDMs and their subsequent spatial products rarely reflect accessibility to any future suitable environment. Dispersal-related movement can be confounded by factors that vary across landscapes and climates, as well as within and among species, and it has therefore remained difficult to parametrise in SDMs. Here we compared 20 models that have previously been used (or have the potential to be used) to represent dispersal processes in SDM to predict future range shifts in response to climate change. We assessed the different dispersal models in terms of their accuracy at predicting future distributions, as well as the uncertainty associated with their predictions. Atlas data for 50 bird species from 1988 to 1991 in Great Britain were treated as base distributions (t1), with the species–environment relationships extrapolated (using three commonly used statistical methods) to 2008–2011 (t2). Dispersal (in the form of the 20 different models) was simulated from the base distribution (t1) to 2008–2011 (t2). The results were then combined and used to identify locations that were both abiotically suitable (obtained from the statistical methods) and accessible (obtained from the dispersal models). The accuracy of these coupled projections was assessed with the 2008–2011 atlas data (the observed t2 distribution). There was substantial variation in the accuracy of the different dispersal models, and in general, the more restrictive dispersal models (e.g. fixed rate dispersal) resulted in lower accuracy for the metrics which reward correct prediction of presences. Ensemble models of the dispersal methods (generated by combining multiple projection outcomes) were created for each species, and a new Ensemble Agreement Index (EAI), which ranges from 0 (no agreement among models) to 1 (full agreement among models) was developed to quantify uncertainty among the projections. EAI values ranged from 0.634 (some areas of disagreement and therefore medium uncertainty among dispersal models) to 0.999 (large areas of agreement and low uncertainty among dispersal models). The results of this research highlight the importance of incorporating dispersal and also illustrate that the method with which dispersal is simulated greatly impacts the projected future distribution. This has important implications for studies aimed at predicting the effects of changing environmental conditions on species’ distributions. Numéro de notice : A2016-575 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/13658816.2016.1158823 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1158823 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81732
in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS > vol 30 n° 9-10 (September - October 2016) . - pp 2050 - 2074[article]Réservation
Réserver ce documentExemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 079-2016051 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible Inventaires : les bryophytes de la Réserve naturelle régionale des étangs de Mépieu / Frédéric Gourges in Lo Parvi, n° 24 (2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Inventaires : les bryophytes de la Réserve naturelle régionale des étangs de Mépieu Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Frédéric Gourges, Auteur ; Benjamin Grange, Auteur ; Julie Delavie, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 20 - 27 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Végétation
[Termes IGN] Bryophyte
[Termes IGN] étang
[Termes IGN] flore locale
[Termes IGN] inventaire de la végétation
[Termes IGN] Isère (38)
[Termes IGN] réserve naturelleRésumé : (auteur) Un des objectifs du nouveau plan de gestion de la réserve naturelle régionale (RNR) des étangs de Mépieu, élaboré en 2013, est de développer la connaissance sur la flore bryophytique au sein de la réserve et ainsi de contribuer à la stratégie nationale d’inventaire de la biodiversité. L’inventaire des bryophytes de la RNR a été confié à l’association Botanique Gentiana dans le cadre d’un programme d’acquisition de connaissances sur la flore bryologique de l’Isère. Les prospections qui se sont déroulées en 4 sessions sur l’année 2013 ont révélé une richesse remarquable. Avec près de 120 taxons recensés, dont 5 espèces d’intérêt national ou européen et 7 espèces d’intérêt local ou régional, la réserve naturelle régionale des étangs de Mépieu apparait d’ores et déjà comme un site bryologique majeur pour la plaine au niveau du département de l’Isère. Numéro de notice : A2016--204 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : BIODIVERSITE/FORET Nature : Article DOI : sans Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96734
in Lo Parvi > n° 24 (2016) . - pp 20 - 27[article]Documents numériques
en open access
Inventaires : les bryophytes de la RNR des étangs de Mépieu - pdf éditeurAdobe Acrobat PDFLocal-scale flood mapping on vegetated floodplains from radiometrically calibrated airborne LiDAR data / Radosław Malinowski in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol 119 (September 2016)
PermalinkMethodology and software solutions for multicriteria evaluation of floodplain retention suitability / Rico Vogel in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 43 n° 4 (September 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkMonitoring the oldest datum / John Stenmark in GEO: Geoconnexion international, vol 15 n° 8 (September 2016)
PermalinkTesting the applicability of BIOME-BGC to simulate beech gross primary production in Europe using a new continental weather dataset / Marta Chiesi in Annals of Forest Science, vol 73 n° 3 (September 2016)
PermalinkTopographic gravitational potential up to second-order derivatives: an examination of approximation errors caused by rock-equivalent topography (RET) / Michael Kuhns in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 9 (September 2016)
PermalinkInvestigation of ionospheric effects on SAR Interferometry (InSAR): A case study of Hong Kong / Wu Zhu in Advances in space research, vol 58 n° 4 (August 2016)
PermalinkAtmospheric correction in time-series SAR interferometry for land surface deformation mapping : A case study of Taiyuan, China / Wei Tang in Advances in space research, vol 58 n° 3 (August 2016)
PermalinkBimodal pattern of seismicity detected at the ocean margin of an Antarctic ice shelf / Denis Lombardi in Geophysical journal international, vol 206 n° 2 (August 2016)
PermalinkDiagnostic study of a high‐precipitation event in the Western Mediterranean: adequacy of current operational networks / Samiro Khodayar in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol 142 n° S1 (August 2016)
PermalinkDisaggregation of remotely sensed soil moisture in heterogeneous landscapes using holistic structure-based models / Subit Chakrabarti in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkEcological constraints increase the climatic debt in forests / Romain Bertrand in Nature communications, vol 7 (2016)
PermalinkA geometry-free and ionosphere-free multipath mitigation method for BDS three-frequency ambiguity resolution / Dezhong Chen in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkA high-quality reprocessed ground-based GPS dataset for atmospheric process studies, radiosonde and model evaluation, and reanalysis of HyMeX Special Observing Period / Olivier Bock in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol 142 n° S1 (August 2016)
PermalinkImplications of weighting metrics for line generalization with Visvalingam's algorithm / Mahes Visvalingam in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 3 (August 2016)
PermalinkA multi-instrument and multi-model assessment of atmospheric moisture variability over the Western Mediterranean during HyMeX / Patrick Chazette in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol 142 n° S1 (August 2016)
PermalinkA new computerized ionosphere tomography model using the mapping function and an application to the study of seismic-ionosphere disturbance / Jian Kong in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkRadiometric correction of airborne radar images over forested terrain with topography / Marc Simard in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkSea ice concentration estimation during melt from dual-pol SAR scenes using deep convolutional neural networks: a case study / Lei Wang in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkA seamless weather–climate multi‐model intercomparison on the representation of a high impact weather event in the western Mediterranean: HyMeX IOP12 / Samiro Khodayar in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol 142 n° S1 (August 2016)
PermalinkSilvicultural climatic turning point for European beech and sessile oak in Western Europe derived from national forest inventories / Klara Dolos in Forest ecology and management, vol 373 (1 August 2016)
PermalinkSoil moisture retrieval in agricultural fields using adaptive model-based polarimetric decomposition of SAR data / Lian He in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 8 (August 2016)
PermalinkA spatial data infrastructure approach for the characterization of New Zealand's groundwater systems / Alexander Kmoch in Transactions in GIS, vol 20 n° 4 (August 2016)
PermalinkThe variability of water vapour and pre-convective conditions over the mountainous island of Corsica / Bianca Adler in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol 142 n° S1 (August 2016)
PermalinkThe Visvalingam algorithm: metrics, measures and heuristics / Mahes Visvalingam in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 3 (August 2016)
PermalinkApport de la sûreté de fonctionnement à l’analyse spatialisée du risque inondation / Michaël Gonzva in Revue internationale de géomatique, vol 26 n° 3 (juillet - septembre 2016)
PermalinkAssessment and validation of evapotranspiration using SEBAL algorithm and Lysimeter data of IARI agricultural farm, India / Anju Bala in Geocarto international, vol 31 n° 7 - 8 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkAssessment of vertical TEC mapping functions for space-based GNSS observations / Jiahao Zhong in GPS solutions, vol 20 n° 3 (July 2016)
PermalinkDiffuser une alerte aux crues rapides via une application smartphone en France. De la théorie à la mise en pratique / Sekedoua Kouadio in Ingénierie des systèmes d'information, ISI : Revue des sciences et technologies de l'information, RSTI, vol 21 n° 4 (juillet - août 2016)
PermalinkDirection-of-arrival estimation of VHF signals recorded on the international space station and simultaneous observations of optical lightning / Hiroshi Kikuchi in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 7 (July 2016)
PermalinkÉvolution spatiotemporelle de l’exposition humaine face au tsunami à Padang : diagnostic de la vulnérabilité et des capacités d’évacuations à l’échelle infra-urbaine / Henky Mayaguezz in Revue internationale de géomatique, vol 26 n° 3 (juillet - septembre 2016)
PermalinkGeneralized terrain topography in radar scattering models / Mariko S. Burgin in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 7 (July 2016)
PermalinkHigh fidelity / Penelope Richardson in GEO: Geoconnexion international, vol 15 n° 7 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkInteractive discovery of sequential patterns in time series of wind data / Norhakim Yusof in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 30 n° 7- 8 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkMapping and characterization of hydrological dynamics in coastal marsh using high temporal resolution Sentinel-1 images / Cécile Cazals in Remote sensing, vol 8 n° 7 (July 2016)
![]()
PermalinkModeling of ionosphere time series using wavelet neural networks (case study: N-W of Iran) / Mir Reza Ghaffari Razin in Advances in space research, vol 58 n° 1 (July 2016)
PermalinkRange imaging of E-region field-aligned irregularities by using a multifrequency technique : validation and initial results / Jenn-Shyong Chen in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 7 (July 2016)
PermalinkShip shape / Christophe Dekeyne in GEO: Geoconnexion international, vol 15 n° 7 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkCharacterization of ionospheric variability in TEC using EOF and wavelets over low-latitude GNSS stations / J.R.K. Kumar Dabbakuti in Advances in space research, vol 57 n° 12 (June 2016)
PermalinkAbove- and belowground tree biomass models for three mangrove species in Tanzania: a nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach / Marco Andrew Njana in Annals of Forest Science, vol 73 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkAn evaluation of unsupervised and supervised learning algorithms for clustering landscape types in the United States / Jochen Wendel in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 43 n° 3 (June 2016)
PermalinkAssessment of continental hydrosphere loading using GNSS measurements / Michał Zygmunt in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
PermalinkCartes topographiques et détermination des frontières en zones montagneuses / Nicolas Jacob in Cartes & Géomatique, n° 228 (juin - août 2016)
PermalinkCork oak pests: a review of insect damage and management / Riziero Tiberi in Annals of Forest Science, vol 73 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkEffects of experimental warming on soil respiration and biomass in Quercus variabilis Blume and Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. seedlings / Nam Jin Noh in Annals of Forest Science, vol 73 n° 2 (June 2016)
Permalink