Descripteur
Termes IGN > sciences naturelles > sciences de la Terre et de l'univers > géosciences > géophysique interne
géophysique interneSynonyme(s)physique du globe |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (7052)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
[article]
Titre : The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Paul Rebischung , Auteur ; Zuheir Altamimi
, Auteur ; Jim Ray, Auteur ; Bruno Garayt
, Auteur
Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 611 – 630 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] données GNSS
[Termes IGN] estimation de précision
[Termes IGN] géocentre
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] réseau géodésique terrestreRésumé : (auteur) Following the first reprocessing campaign performed by the International GNSS Service (IGS) in 2008, a second reprocessing campaign (repro2) was finalized in 2015. Nine different Analysis Centers (ACs) reanalyzed the history of GNSS data collected by a global tracking network back to 1994 using the latest available models and methodology, and provided daily terrestrial frame solutions among other products. Daily combinations of the AC terrestrial frame solutions provided the IGS input to the next release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2014). From weighted root mean squares values of the residuals of the daily repro2 combinations, the overall inter-AC level of agreement is assessed to be 1.5 mm for the horizontal components and 4 mm for the vertical component of station positions, 25–40 μas for pole coordinates, 140–200 μas/day for pole rates, 8–20 μs/day for calibrated length-of-day estimates, 4 mm for the X and Y components of geocenter motion, 8 mm for its Z component and 0.5 mm for the terrestrial scale. On the long term, the origins (resp. scales) of the AC terrestrial frames show relative offsets and rates within ±3 mm and ±0.3 mm/year (resp. ±0.5 mm and ±0.05 mm/year). The combination residuals also present AC-specific features, some of which are explained by known analysis specifics, while others remain under investigation. Numéro de notice : A2016-425 Affiliation des auteurs : LASTIG LAREG+Ext (2012-mi2018) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-016-0897-6 Date de publication en ligne : 08/04/2016 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0897-6 Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81319
in Journal of geodesy > vol 90 n° 7 (July 2016) . - pp 611 – 630[article]Utilization of high-resolution EGM2008 gravity data for geological exploration over the Singhbhum-Orissa Craton, India / S.K. Pal in Geocarto international, vol 31 n° 7 - 8 (July - August 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Utilization of high-resolution EGM2008 gravity data for geological exploration over the Singhbhum-Orissa Craton, India Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : S.K. Pal, Auteur ; T.J. Majumdar, Auteur ; Vipin Kumar Pathak, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 783 - 802 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications de géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] carte géologique
[Termes IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes IGN] European Improved Gravity Model of the Earth by New techniques
[Termes IGN] géologie locale
[Termes IGN] gravimétrie spatiale
[Termes IGN] prospection minéraleRésumé : (Auteur) High-resolution EIGEN6C4 and EGM2008 Bouguer gravity data of 2190 degree spherical harmonic over the Singhbhum-Orissa Craton, India, have been generated from the International Centre for Global Earth Models. The Bouguer gravity anomaly difference maps of (i) in situ and EIGEN6C4, (ii) in situ and EGM2008 and iii) EIGEN6C4 and EGM2008 of the study area are compared. It reveals that EIGEN6C4 has lesser systematic error than EGM2008. However, from different profile plots of Bouguer gravity, east–west horizontal derivative and north–south horizontal derivative anomalies of the in situ, EIGEN6C4 and EGM2008, it is observed that most of the signatures of lithounits and geological structural elements are delineated very well by EGM2008 and match 94–98% with those of EIGEN6C4. Further, the Bouguer gravity, east–west horizontal derivative and north–south horizontal derivative anomalies of EGM2008 data over the study area have been used effectively for identifying various lithounits and geological structural elements. Numéro de notice : A2016-444 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/10106049.2015.1076064 Date de publication en ligne : 11/09/2015 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1076064 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81351
in Geocarto international > vol 31 n° 7 - 8 (July - August 2016) . - pp 783 - 802[article]Réservation
Réserver ce documentExemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 059-2016041 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible Assessment of continental hydrosphere loading using GNSS measurements / Michał Zygmunt in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Assessment of continental hydrosphere loading using GNSS measurements Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Michał Zygmunt, Auteur ; Marcin Rajner, Auteur ; Tomasz Liwosz, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 36 - 53 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications de géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] déformation de la croute terrestre
[Termes IGN] déformation verticale de la croute terrestre
[Termes IGN] données GNSS
[Termes IGN] fonction de Green
[Termes IGN] modèle hydrographique
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] station permanente
[Termes IGN] surcharge océaniqueRésumé : (Auteur) Presented paper is dedicated to problems of deformation of the Earth's crust as a response to the surface loading caused by continental waters. The aim of this study was to specify areas particularly vulnerable to studied deformation and to compare calculated and observed displacements. Information of the continental water volume was taken from the WaterGAP Global Hydrological Model. Calculated values of the deformations were verified with the results obtained with programs SPOTL and grat. Vertical deformations were almost 10 times higher than the deformation in the horizontal plane, for which reason later part of the paper focuses on the former. In order to check agreement of the calculated and observed deformation 23 stations of International GNSS Service (IGS) were selected and divided into three groups (inland, near the shoreline and islands). Before comparison outliers and discontinuities were removed from GNSS observations. Modelled and observed signals were centred. The analysed time series of the vertical displacements showed that only for the inland stations it is possible to effectively remove displacements caused by mass transfer in the hydrosphere. For stations located in the coastal regions or islands, it is necessary to consider additional movement effects resulting from indirect ocean tidal loading or atmosphere loading. Numéro de notice : A2016-651 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1515/rgg-2016-0020 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rgg-2016-0020 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81870
in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics > vol 101 (June 2016) . - pp 36 - 53[article]Automated bias-compensation approach for pushbroom sensor modeling using digital elevation model / Kwan-Young Oh in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 54 n° 6 (June 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Automated bias-compensation approach for pushbroom sensor modeling using digital elevation model Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Kwan-Young Oh, Auteur ; Hyung-Sup Jung, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 3400 - 3409 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement d'image optique
[Termes IGN] compensation
[Termes IGN] image Kompsat
[Termes IGN] image SRTM
[Termes IGN] modèle numérique de terrain
[Termes IGN] modèle par fonctions rationnelles
[Termes IGN] pouvoir de résolution géométriqueRésumé : (Auteur) Bias compensation of rational polynomial coefficients (RPCs) is one of the most important preprocessing steps in high-resolution satellite image processing. It generally requires accurate ground control points (GCPs), but GCP acquisition is both time consuming and laborious. In this paper, we propose a time- and cost-efficient method for automated bias compensation of the RPC of high-resolution stereo image pairs. Two Korean Multi-purpose Satellite-2 (KOMPSAT-2) stereo image pairs acquired in Daejeon and Busan, Korea, and the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) with the spatial resolution of 3 arcsec (~90 m) were used for analysis. In the two study areas, 33 and 29 check points were respectively used for the performance evaluation. After bias compensation with the proposed method, the root-mean-square (RMS) errors for both of the study areas were less than 10 m, in all coordinate components, while the RMS error vectors were approximately 10 m. Although the RMS error vectors were slightly larger than the standard deviations of the residual errors of the initial ground coordinates, it would seem that they yielded acceptable values because the proposed method largely depends on the spatial resolution, the error of the SRTM DEM, the tie point selection error, and so on. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed method allows for the automated bias compensation of RPCs of KOMPSAT-2 images. Numéro de notice : A2016-853 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2517100 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2517100 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=82990
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 54 n° 6 (June 2016) . - pp 3400 - 3409[article]Comparison of robust estimators for leveling networks in Monte Carlo simulations / Maria Pokarowska in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Comparison of robust estimators for leveling networks in Monte Carlo simulations Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Maria Pokarowska, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 70 - 81 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Nivellement
[Termes IGN] méthode de Monte-Carlo
[Termes IGN] méthode des moindres carrés
[Termes IGN] méthode robuste
[Termes IGN] réseau de nivellement
[Termes IGN] valeur aberranteRésumé : (Auteur) We compared the method of least squares (LS), Pope’s iterative data snooping (IDS) and Huber’s M-estimator (HU) in realistic leveling networks, for which the heights or the vertical displacements of points are known. The study was conducted using the Monte Carlo simulation, in which one repeatedly generates sets of observations related to the measurement data, then calculates values of the estimators and, finally, assesses it with respect to the real coordinates. To simulate outliers we used popular mixture models with two or more normal distributions. It is shown that for small, strong networks robust methods IDS and HU are more accurate than LS, but for large, weak networks occurring in practice there is no significant difference between the considered methods in the accuracy of the solution. Numéro de notice : A2016-653 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1515/rgg-2016-0023 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rgg-2016-0023 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81872
in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics > vol 101 (June 2016) . - pp 70 - 81[article]A concept for the examination of reference points stability in horizontal control networks / Ryszard Malarski in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
PermalinkEmpirical methods of reducing the observations in geodetic networks / Roman Kadaj in Geodesy and cartography, vol 65 n° 1 (June 2016)
PermalinkGeometric accuracy of topographical objects at Polish topographic maps / Radzym Lawniczack in Geodesy and cartography, vol 65 n° 1 (June 2016)
PermalinkListening for RF noise : An analysis of pre-despreading GNSS interference detection techniques / Ali Jafarnia-Jahromi in Inside GNSS, vol 11 n° 3 (May - June 2016)
PermalinkMesure de robustesse d'un réseau géodésique 3D : cas du réseau GPS de la ville d'Oran (Algérie) / Bachir Gourine in XYZ, n° 147 (juin - août 2016)
PermalinkOn the impact of airborne gravity data to fused gravity field models / Dimitrios Bolkas in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 6 (June 2016)
PermalinkOptimization of observation plan based on the stochastic characteristics of the geodetic network / Wojciech Pachelski in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
PermalinkOver the borderline / Christophe Dekeyne in GEO: Geoconnexion international, vol 15 n° 6 (June 2016)
PermalinkRapid mapping method based on free blocks of surveys / Xianwen Yu in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 10 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkSingle-frequency precise point positioning using multi-constellation GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo and Beidou / Mahmoud Abd Rabbou in Geomatica, vol 70 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkSource model from ALOS-2 ScanSAR of the 2015 Nepal earthquakes / Youtian Liu in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 10 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkA spatial analysis of GEOID03 and GEOID09 in Connecticut / Kazi Arifuzzaman in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 10 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkA systematic impact assessment of GRACE error correlation on data assimilation in hydrological models / Maike Schumacher in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 6 (June 2016)
PermalinkTechnical considerations for modernizing Nova Scotia’s Coordinate Referencing System / Jason Bond in Geomatica, vol 70 n° 2 (June 2016)
PermalinkTesting impact of the strategy of VLBI data analysis on the estimation of Earth Orientation Parameters and station coordinates / Agata Wielgosz in Reports on geodesy and geoinformatics, vol 101 (June 2016)
PermalinkThe current state of the creation and modernization of national geodetic and cartographic resources in Poland / Adam Doskocz in Open geosciences, vol 8 n° 1 (January - July 2016)
PermalinkTransformation des coordonnées relevées sur la carte topographique ancienne en coordonnées géodésiques RGC11 au Cameroun / Joseph Kamguia in XYZ, n° 147 (juin - août 2016)
PermalinkEffect of sensor modelling methods on computation of 3-D coordinates from Cartosat-1 stereo data / Mritunjay Kumar Singh in Geocarto international, vol 31 n° 5 - 6 (May - June 2016)
PermalinkEvaluating the use of GPS heights in water conservation applications / Ahmed F. Elaksher in Survey review, vol 48 n° 348 (May 2016)
PermalinkGeneralization of the Lambert–Lagrange projection / Sebastian Orihuela in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 2 (May 2016)
PermalinkGNSS threat quantification in the United Kingdom in 2015 / Chaz Dixon in Navigation aérienne, maritime, spatiale, terrestre, vol 63 n° 250 (mai - août 2016)
PermalinkHigh-precision positioning of radar scatterers / Prabu Dheenathayalan in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 5 (May 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkProjection Wizard – An online map projection selection tool / Bojan Šavrič in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 2 (May 2016)
PermalinkVingt-cinq ans de recherche tous azimuts / Françoise de Blomac in DécryptaGéo le mag, n° 177 (mai 2016)
PermalinkAbsolute IGS antenna phase center model igs08.atx: status and potential improvements / Ralf Schmid in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 4 (April 2016)
PermalinkCODE’s new ultra-rapid orbit and ERP products for the IGS / Simon Lutz in GPS solutions, vol 20 n° 2 (April 2016)
PermalinkA correctly weighted least squares adjustment - Part 3 Estimating standard errors in angular observations / Charles D. Ghilani in xyHt, vol 2016 n° 4 (April 2016)
PermalinkGLONASS fractional-cycle bias estimation across inhomogeneous receivers for PPP ambiguity resolution / Jianghui Geng in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 4 (April 2016)
PermalinkGNSS navigation and positioning for the GEOHALO experiment in Italy / Kaifei He in GPS solutions, vol 20 n° 2 (April 2016)
PermalinkImpact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results / Simon Lutz in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 4 (April 2016)
PermalinkJoint analysis of GOCE gravity gradients data of gravitational potential and of gravity with seismological and geodynamic observations to infer mantle properties / Marianne Greff-Lefftz in Geophysical journal international, vol 205 n° 1 (April 2016)
PermalinkMonitoring recovery after earthquakes through the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and ground observations: the case of L’Aquila (Italy) / Diana Contreras in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 43 n° 2 (April - May 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkPerformance analysis of triple-frequency ambiguity resolution with BeiDou observations / Xiaohong Zhang in GPS solutions, vol 20 n° 2 (April 2016)
PermalinkA study on the dependency of GNSS pseudorange biases on correlator spacing / André Hauschild in GPS solutions, vol 20 n° 2 (April 2016)
Permalink14 years of GPS tropospheric delays in the French–Italian border region : comparisons and first application in a case study / Domenico Sguerso in Applied geomatics, vol 8 n° 1 (March 2016)
PermalinkAccuracy of ionospheric models used in GNSS and SBAS: methodology and analysis / Adria Rovira-Garcia in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 3 (March 2016)
PermalinkClarifying the ambiguities: Examining the interoperability of precise point positioning products / Garrett Seepersad in GPS world, vol 27 n° 3 (March 2016)
PermalinkCombined Architecture : Enhancing Multi-Dimensional Signal Quality in GNSS Receivers / Nunzia Giorgia Ferrara in Inside GNSS, vol 11 n° 2 (March - April 2016)
PermalinkComparison of Satellite-Only Gravity Field Models Constructed with All and Parts of the GOCE Gravity Gradient Dataset / Sean L. Bruinsma in Marine geodesy, vol 39 n° 3-4 (March - June 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkGNSS & the Law: GLONASS and PNT in Russia / Alexey Bolkunov in Inside GNSS, vol 11 n° 2 (March - April 2016)
PermalinkLe GPS dévoile les liens entre les grands séismes de subduction au Chili / Emilie Klein in XYZ, n° 146 (mars - mai 2016)
Permalink