Descripteur
Termes IGN > aménagement > infrastructure > réseau technique > réseau de télécommunication > réseau télématique > réseau informatique > interopérabilité
interopérabilité
Commentaire :
interopérabilité de réseaux (télécommunications). réseau d'ordinateurs. >> OSI (architecture de réseaux), Protocole de réseaux d'ordinateurs. >>Terme(s) spécifique(s) : architecture médiateur-wrapper, CISCO IOS, passerelle (réseau d'ordinateurs), pont (réseau d'ordinateurs), routeur (réseau d'ordinateurs). Equiv. LCSH : Internetworking (Telecommunication). Domaine(s) : 621, 620. Synonyme(s)échange de donnéesVoir aussi |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (270)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
"Apport d'un réseau GPS temps réel centimétrique en vue de garantir l'interopérabilité des SIG entre les pays frontaliers et la France et d'assurer l'homogénéité du géoréférencement des SIG" / Madara Caunite (2006)
Titre : "Apport d'un réseau GPS temps réel centimétrique en vue de garantir l'interopérabilité des SIG entre les pays frontaliers et la France et d'assurer l'homogénéité du géoréférencement des SIG" Type de document : Mémoire Auteurs : Madara Caunite, Auteur Editeur : Champs-sur-Marne : Ecole nationale des sciences géographiques ENSG Année de publication : 2006 Importance : 36 p. Format : 21 x 30 cm Note générale : bibliographie
Master professionnel en GéomatiqueLangues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Navigation et positionnement
[Termes IGN] Europe (géographie politique)
[Termes IGN] géoréférencement
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité
[Termes IGN] positionnement cinématique en temps réel
[Termes IGN] réseau permanent EUREF
[Termes IGN] station virtuelle de référence
[Termes IGN] système d'information géographique
[Termes IGN] TeriaIndex. décimale : DSIG Mémoires du master 2 IG, du master 2 SIG, de l'ex DEA SIG Résumé : (auteur) Le sujet "Apport d'un réseau GPS temps réel centimétrique en vue de garantir l'interopérabilité des SIG entre les pays frontaliers et la France et d'assurer l'homogénéité du géoréférencement des SIG" est d'actualité. De nombreux pays ont créé des réseaux permanents GNSS temps. Il s'agit de réseaux à caractère public ou privé, proposant des positionnements de précision variable et qui ont une vocation commerciale. En France un tel réseau sous l'impulsion des Géomètres-Experts, baptisé TERIA, vient d'être implémenté et devrait être opérationnel pour la fin de l'année 2006. Il a pour vocation de s'ouvrir à l'Europe et une de ses finalités est d'être interopérable avec les pays frontaliers respectifs, dont une analyse des réseaux est indispensable. Note de contenu : 1- Introduction
2- Les réseaux GPS temps réel
3- Démarche de l'étude
4- Expérience personnelle
5- France
6- Interopérabilité des réseaux GPS temps réel centimétriques avec les pays frontaliers
7- Constat sur l'interopérabilité des systèmes d'information géographique
8- Propositions et actions
9- ConclusionNuméro de notice : 25733 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE/POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Mémoire Master 2 IG Organisme de stage : Exagone Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94922 Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 25733-01 DSIG Livre Centre de documentation En réserve Mezzanine Disponible GPS et Galileo : systèmes de navigation par satellites / Jean-Marc Piéplu (2006)
Titre : GPS et Galileo : systèmes de navigation par satellites Type de document : Guide/Manuel Auteurs : Jean-Marc Piéplu, Auteur ; Olivier Salvatori, Auteur Editeur : Paris : Eyrolles Année de publication : 2006 Importance : 154 p. Format : 17 x 23 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-2-212-11947-3 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] constellation Galileo
[Termes IGN] constellation GPS
[Termes IGN] Galileo
[Termes IGN] Global Orbitography Navigation Satellite System
[Termes IGN] Global Positioning System
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] récepteur Galileo
[Termes IGN] récepteur GPS
[Termes IGN] service fondé sur la position
[Termes IGN] signal Galileo
[Termes IGN] signal GLONASS
[Termes IGN] signal GPS
[Termes IGN] synchronisation
[Termes IGN] système de positionnement par satellites
[Termes IGN] système de référence mondialIndex. décimale : 30.61 Systèmes de Positionnement par Satellites du GNSS Résumé : (Editeur) Conçu initialement pour des applications militaires, le GPS (Global Positioning System) est maintenant couramment utilisé dans les transports maritimes, aériens et terrestres, les opérations de secours et de sauvetage, les travaux publics, la prospection pétrolière, l'agriculture, ou tout simplement associé à la voiture ou au téléphone mobile dans la vie de tous les jours. L'Europe tente de rattraper son retard avec le programme Galileo. qui assurera l'indépendance du Vieux Continent dans ce domaine stratégique et étendra les capacités actuellement offertes par le GPS. Écrit par l'un des premiers concepteurs de Galileo, cet ouvrage explique comment fonctionnent les systèmes de navigation par satellite, des notions physiques de base aux principes de fonctionnement des récepteurs disponibles en grandes surfaces. Il présente ensuite en détail les systèmes GPS et Galileo, en décrivant leurs infrastructures techniques, les services offerts et les différents domaines d'application. Note de contenu : Introduction : organisation de l'ouvrage
Chapitre 1 - La navigation par satellite
Chapitre 2 - Les récepteurs
Chapitre 3 - Les applications
Chapitre 4 - Le système GPS
Chapitre 5 - Galileo
Chapitre 6 - Autres systèmes de navigation par satellite
Chapitre 7 - Interopérabilité entre le GPS, Galileo et Glonass
Conclusion
GlossaireNuméro de notice : 16727 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Manuel de cours Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=55234 ISPRS workshop Multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data, Hanover, Germany, 22. - 24. February 2006 / M. Hampe (2006)
Titre : ISPRS workshop Multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data, Hanover, Germany, 22. - 24. February 2006 Type de document : Actes de congrès Auteurs : M. Hampe, Éditeur scientifique ; Monika Sester, Éditeur scientifique ; Lars Harrie, Éditeur scientifique Editeur : International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing ISPRS Année de publication : 2006 Collection : International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, ISSN 1682-1750 num. 36-2/W40 Conférence : ISPRS 2006, Multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data workshop 22/02/2006 24/02/2006 Hanovre Allemagne ISPRS OA Archives Importance : 111 p. Format : 21 x 30 cm Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées
[Termes IGN] données localisées
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité
[Termes IGN] représentation multipleNote de contenu : session 1 - Generalisation and web services
session 2 - Semantic integration
session 3 - Cartographic production
session 4 - Generalisation
session 5 - Hierarchiues in images and in text
session 6 - MatchingNuméro de notice : 17426 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Actes DOI : sans En ligne : http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/2-W40/ Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=88785 ContientExemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 17426-01 CG2006 Livre Centre de documentation Congrès Disponible A model-driven approach to management of integrated metadata-spatial data in the context of spatial infrastructures / Chouaieb Najar (2006)
Titre : A model-driven approach to management of integrated metadata-spatial data in the context of spatial infrastructures Type de document : Thèse/HDR Auteurs : Chouaieb Najar, Auteur Editeur : Zurich : Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammetrie IGP - ETH Année de publication : 2006 Collection : IGP Mitteilungen, ISSN 0252-9335 num. 090 Importance : 164 p. Format : 21 x 30 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-3-906467-60-3 Note générale : Bibliographie
Doctoral thesisLangues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées
[Termes IGN] architecture orientée modèle
[Termes IGN] données localisées
[Termes IGN] implémentation (informatique)
[Termes IGN] infrastructure nationale des données localisées
[Termes IGN] intégration de données
[Termes IGN] INTERLIS
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité sémantique
[Termes IGN] métadonnées
[Termes IGN] métadonnées géographiques
[Termes IGN] modèle conceptuel de données localisées
[Termes IGN] prototype
[Termes IGN] relation sémantique
[Termes IGN] segmentation sémantique
[Termes IGN] serveur web
[Termes IGN] service web géographique
[Termes IGN] UMLRésumé : (Auteur) The demand for spatial metadata to describe spatial data is growing in the networked environment. Yet, currently metadata acquisition and management often play a subordinate role in many organizations and are considered overhead. If at all, metadata are acquired much after the spatial data and are stored in separate repositories. Consequently, there are two independent data sets to manage and update: spatial data and metadata. These are often redundant and inconsistent, as it is not always clear which information is metadata and which is spatial data.
Looking at the interoperability in Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) from a technical point of view, the specialized spatial search engine needs spatial data which are labeled and indexed by metadata. The more reliable and consistent such metadata are, the better they support an SDI as an enabling platform to search, exchange and process spatial data. This leaves a gap between the status-quo of metadata and the demand for metadata which needs to be accounted for with new metadata management concepts.
Consequently, the main focus of this thesis concerns the optimization of metadata management by integrating metadata and spatial data in a common file or database. This common metadata-spatial data set can be considered to be 'comprehensive spatial data'.
The concept of metadata-spatial data integration enables the spatial data to carry their own metadata description with them. The approach distinguishes between already existing spatial data models, which have to be extended and newly planned data models and sets, which can managed commonly from the beginning. The different groups of metadata which can be integrated are discussed (implicitly derivable, explicitly derivable and new metadata attributes) and the principles how these might be placed in a model (top-down and bottom-up). The three steps of integration include firstly a semantic analysis and translation, secondly a structural analysis and thirdly hierarchical integration as well as a semantic transformation.
Provided that common metadata-spatial data sets exist, the concept of views offers the possibility to extract metadata and spatial data according to various standards and other excepts from the comprehensive data set. This gains flexibility and interoperability for using common metadata-spatial data sets in an SDI environment in which different services and users need different extracts and structures of a certain data or metadata set.
In order to review the feasibility of the concept of metadata-spatial data integration three test data models and their data sets are integrated with their corresponding metadata. The Swiss federal cadastral model, a water supply model of the City of Zurich and an environmental data model vary in complexity, size modeling structure, modeling language as well as in the question whether they are standardized. The results of this case study show that the integration of metadata in existing models and data sets is feasible. For each of the chosen models certain top-down and bottom-up metadata attributes are defined. Furthermore, the implicitly and explicitly derivable attributes are ascertained. In a workshop the common models were verified with experts who know the original models well.
In order to be able to use the concept of integration on any data set in a similar way, rules for the integration are necessary. Therefore, general principles are derived for object-oriented and relational modeling languages by comparing the results from the case study and abstracting them to a general case of any spatial data set. A group of general, automatic principles to insert certain metadata at a specific place in the model has been defined. These automatic principles consist of general top-down metadata that are valid for the whole model and bottom-up metadata that mirror the changes and heterogeneity of data within the model. Notwithstanding, it is also necessary for the modeling expert who knows the spatial data well to choose which metadata can be derived implicitly and explicitly.
In order to support the common management of metadata and spatial data with tools and to support new metadata-spatial data sets in their common handling, two prototype implementations are realized. The first prototype is an existing open source modeling software called INTERLIS/UML Editor, which is extended by implementing the principles for metadata-spatial data integration. For example, a new functionality is that certain metadata are added automatically when a new model is generated. Consequently common modeling for spatial data and metadata is supported in a harmonized way. The second prototype implementation explores the possibilities of creating views and functionalities of views in the relational database management system Oracle 9i. Views according to different profiles of ISO 19115 are extracted from integrated data sets.Note de contenu : Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Motivation.
1.3 Problem Statement
1.4 Hypothesis and Objectives
1.5 Approach
1.6 Structure of the Thesis
1.7 Summary
Chapter 2 Basic Concepts and Related Literature
2.1 Basic Definitions
2.2 Spatial Data Infrastructures and GIS
2.3 Components of Spatial Data Infrastructures
2.4 Current SDI Initiatives
2.5 Spatial Data Modeling
2.6 Semantic Processing of Spatial Data Sets
2.7 Summary
Chapter 3 State of the Art in Metadata
3.2 Current Situation in Research of Metadata Management
3.2 Relevance of Concept of Integration in Research
3.3 Summary
Chapter 4 Concept of Integration and Views
4.1 Introduction to Semantic Mapping
4.2 Concept of Metadata-Spatial Data Integration
4.3 Concept of Views
4.4 Discussion in Context of SDI
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Creating Principles for Metadata- Spatial Data Integration
5.1 Case Study with Existing Spatial Data Sets
5.2 Discussion of Integration
5.3 The Design of Principles
5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Prototype Implementation
6.1 Introduction of General Tools
6.2 Implementation of the Modeling Prototype.
6.3 Implementation of the View Process
6.4 Demonstrator for Web Services using Integrated Metadata Spatial Data Sets
6.5 Summary
Chapter 7 Discussion of Results
7.1 Summary of Results
7.2 Discussion of Results and Conclusion
7.3 OutlookNuméro de notice : 15200 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE/INFORMATIQUE Nature : Thèse étrangère DOI : 10.3929/ethz-a-005201125 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005201125 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=55092 Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 15200-01 37.10 Livre Centre de documentation Géomatique Disponible
Titre : Semantic interoperability of distributed geo-services Type de document : Thèse/HDR Auteurs : Robert Lemmens, Auteur Editeur : Delft : Netherlands Geodetic Commission NGC Année de publication : 2006 Collection : Netherlands Geodetic Commission Publications on Geodesy, ISSN 0165-1706 num. 63 Importance : 291 p. Format : 17 x 24 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-90-6132-298-6 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Infrastructure de données
[Termes IGN] architecture client-serveur
[Termes IGN] base de connaissances
[Termes IGN] diffusion de données
[Termes IGN] hétérogénéité sémantique
[Termes IGN] infrastructure mondiale des données localisées
[Termes IGN] intégration de données
[Termes IGN] interopérabilité sémantique
[Termes IGN] logiciel libre
[Termes IGN] modèle sémantique de données
[Termes IGN] ontologie
[Termes IGN] OWL
[Termes IGN] prototype
[Termes IGN] réseau sémantique
[Termes IGN] service de géoinformation
[Termes IGN] service fondé sur la position
[Termes IGN] service web géographique
[Termes IGN] système d'information géographiqueRésumé : (Auteur) The last two decades have shown a major shift from stand-alone software systems to networked ones. As with all information system domains, Geographic Information Systems (GISs) have been influenced to a large extent by recent internet developments, resulting in an increasing availability of client/server applications using distributed geo-(web-)services, such as interactive maps, route planners and gazetteers. There is an increasing need for organisations to perform on demand geo-processing tasks by integrating and reusing geo-information and geo-services from within and outside the organisation. These activities are typically performed in the context of so called Geo-Information Infrastructures (GIls).
The process of integrating services is commonly referred to as service chaining. This requires that services can be easily found, and that they are executable and interoperable. Interoperability means that the services 'understand' each other's messages. A major impediment is formed by the semantic heterogeneity (the differences in meaning) of geo-information and of the functionality of geo-services. Making services semantically interoperable is an important prerequisite for information sharing in today's networked society. This involves services that rely on different knowledge domains, one of which is the geo-information domain.
Within this context, the research presented in this thesis provides solutions for the computer-aided integration of distributed heterogeneous geo-information and geo-services, based on their semantics (the meaning of their content).
Geo-information distinguishes from other information by its spatial relevance. Geo-services often have to deal integrally with multiple-representations of features in a spatial, temporal and thematic dimension. Geo-services are also implicitly connected by the geographic location of the features they process. This has implications for the interoperability of geo-services. For example, the validity of a service (e.g., a routeplanner) may be bound to a specific geographic area, which could imply it cannot be used in combination with services involving another validity area. On the contrary, services that seem to be incompatible due to differences in feature representation (e.g., geometry, coordinate reference system), may turn out to be useful in combination, because they contain information on the same locations.
On demand geo-processing requires services and the meta-information that describes the services to be available at the time a task is being executed. Moreover, the service descriptions should be based on commonly agreed rules for service characterisation. Inter-service contracts that contain such rules may result in service interoperability and this can be achieved at three levels: syntax, structure and semantics. The influential specifications of the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and the ISO 19100 series of standards, implement formal contracts on the syntactical and structural level, but they prescribe only informal contracting at the semantic level. Despite their rigid conceptualisation, they lack a machine-accessible formalisation that supports the specification of semantics for geo-information and geo-services. This research has developed such a formalisation, which is specified in a so called semantic interoperability framework. In this framework a key role is played by machine ontologies, which are machine-accessible representations of knowledge that are used for inferring intra- and inter-resource relationships. Recent research efforts in the field of the Semantic Web have contributed considerably to the deployment of ontology-based applications by providing a theoretical foundation (Description Logics), ontology languages (e.g., the Web Ontology Language (OWL)), and tools for ontology creation, access and reasoning with web-based (machine) ontologies. The power of web-based ontologies lies in their interoperable (XML based) representation, the use of unique namespaces and the fact that they allow for automated reasoning.
The semantic interoperability framework developed in this research, contains (1) geo-information modelling ontologies which are based on the ISO General Feature Model, (2) domain specific ontologies (amongst others, one which is based on a data model used by the Dutch Topographic Service), and (3) a geo-operation modelling ontology. The latter is based on a geo-operation taxonomy, an input/output parameter characterisation and a workflow model. The taxonomy and parameter characterisation have been developed as part of this research, the workflow model is based on OWL-S, an OWL-based upper ontology for web services.
Ontology-based service descriptions have been created in the context of four use cases in the following areas: (1) information model integration for risk mapping, (2) ad hoc data integration in a disaster emergency situation, (3) reuse of geo-data and geo-services in scientific research, and (4) ad hoc integration of travel services. The ontology-based descriptions are used as representations of service requests and advertisements in a matchmaking process. The matchmaking is performed by an ontology reasoner which can infer implicit relationships that exist in a knowledge base containing service descriptions as sets of concepts. The reasoner is implemented together with the ontologies in a prototype environment. Except for the reasoner, this has been carried out with open source software. Within this environment, basic matchmaking has been successfully performed to support data set integration and service chaining. This has been demonstrated by tests implementing the aforementioned use cases.
The offered solution is flexible and extensible. With respect to flexibility, the research demonstrates the use of incomplete service descriptions. With respect to extensibility, the research shows how service descriptions can be extended with new concepts. It is also demonstrated how existing application domains can be linked through ontology mappings. In the process of service chaining, four steps have been identified, i.e., discovery, abstract composition, concrete composition and execution. The link between the abstract and concrete composition of services is realised by annotation, which connects ontology elements with parameters of executable code. For one of the use cases, this code has been deployed in a prototype software application (the latter being part of an external research effort).
There are also limitations to the approach followed, which are partly due to the limitations of OWL and reasoning with it, i.e., with respect to spatial reasoning and the use of metaclasses. In addition, the current prototype environment has several shortcomings: (1) constraints of the user-interfaces (entering service descriptions in Description Logics is still rather complex), (2) the inflexibility of the reasoning implementation and (3) the incompleteness of mappings between domain ontologies, all of which are thought to be surmountable.
A number of recommendations are made for the improvement of the current design and implementation of the interoperability framework, such as the incorporation of: meta-information propagation, concept similarity quantifiers and result ranking in the matchmaking process. The deployment of the approach requires key organisations such as OGC to develop and maintain domain independent parts of a semantic interoperability framework and organisations with a GIl mandate to manage its domain dependent parts.
Application fields that are thought to benefit from the presented approach in the short term are, amongst others: service discovery and chaining in GII, harmonisation of geo-information models, multiple-representation of geo-information, profile matching of geo-service users, documentation of geo-processing history (lineage), and quality assessment of meta-information. The target groups of this research are firstly geo-information engineers who are confronted with information integration issues and service interoperability issues, and secondly, information engineers in general confronted with distributed information and with end users that need to access distributed services as one virtual application.Note de contenu : 1 Why interoperability is important
1.1 Research context and motivation
1.2 Research objectives
1.3 Research approach
1.4 Related work
1.5 Thesis outline
2 Interoperable distributed services
2.1 Distributed processing paradigms
2.2 Interoperability and heterogeneity
2.3 Overcoming heterogeneity by contract
2.4 Interoperability models
2.5 Geo-services
2.6 Geo-service use cases
2.7 Summary and reflection
3 Service models for discovery, composition and execution
3.1 Information modelling
3.2 Process modelling
3.3 Service chaining
3.4 Summary and reflection
4 Semantic modelling
4.1 What is an ontology?
4.2 Foundations for machine ontology
4.3 Ontology design and creation
4.4 Ontology representations and notation
4.5 Reasoning with a knowledge base
4.6 Semantic interoperability frameworks
4.7 Semantic web services
4.8 Geo-semantic modelling and spatial relevance
4.9 Summary and reflection
5 Semantic interoperability framework for geo-services
5.1 Semantic framework overview
5.2 Feature symbol ontology
5.3 Feature concept ontologies
5.4 Geo-operation characterisations ? OPERA
5.5 OPERA-R ? Feature processing operations
5.6 Geo-service descriptions
5.7 Summary and reflection
6 Geo-information matching and service chaining
6.1 Example: Riskmap chain
6.2 Semantic modelling of geo-service chains
6.3 Derived operations and ontology mappings
6.4 Matchmaking
6.5 Summary and reflection
7 Use case implementations
7.1 Riskmap NL
7.2 Emergency 112
7.3 Research Net
7.4 Travel Google
7.5 Summary and reflection
8 Implementation of prototypes: OnToGeo and GeoMatchMaker
8.1 Practical design and implementation issues of OnToGeo
8.2 Workbench tools
8.3 GeoMatchMaker, an integrated prototype
8.4 Creating service descriptions
8.5 Summary and reflection
9 Conclusions and recommendations
9.1 Summary and reflection
9.2 Conclusions
9.3 Main contributions
9.4 Deployment
9.5 Recommendations for further workNuméro de notice : 15204 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Thèse étrangère En ligne : https://www.ncgeo.nl/downloads/63Lemmens.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=55094 Exemplaires(2)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 15204-01 37.00 Livre Centre de documentation Géomatique Disponible 15204-02 37.00 Livre Centre de documentation Géomatique Disponible An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS) / J.M. Corbett in Cartographica, vol 40 n° 4 (December 2005)PermalinkExtending the UK's digital national framework offshore: sea zone solutions creates marine geographic information / M. Osborne in Geoinformatics, vol 8 n° 8 (01/12/2005)PermalinkFormalisation des informations géographiques en mode maillé / Jean-Paul Donnay in Revue internationale de géomatique, vol 15 n° 4 (décembre 2005 – février 2006)Permalink"We should accept our role as a provider of information and services to citizens": interview with Zeljko Bacic, president of Eurogeographics / J. Triglav in Geoinformatics, vol 8 n° 8 (01/12/2005)PermalinkEurospec meant to deliver interoperability of base reference information: programme initiated by Eurogeographics / Claude Luzet in Geoinformatics, vol 8 n° 6 (01/09/2005)PermalinkReal-time generalization of XML-encoded spatial data for the Web and mobile devices / L. Tiina Sarjakoski in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 19 n° 8 - 9 (september 2005)PermalinkAny*GIS satisfies editing? Display and analysis requirements: stand alone GIS software reads and writes data / G. Baca in Geoinformatics, vol 8 n° 5 (01/08/2005)PermalinkIDENA, spatial data infrastructure of Navarre: architecture, metadata and interoperability / P. Echamendi in GIM international, vol 19 n° 8 (August 2005)PermalinkUsing uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories / O. Ahlqvist in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 19 n° 7 (august 2005)PermalinkDe la normalisation à l'interopérabilité / Françoise de Blomac in SIG la lettre, n° 68 (juin 2005)Permalink