Centre de documentation
scientifique

A comparison of linear-mode and single-photon airborne LiDAR in species-specific forest inventories / Janne Raty in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 60 n° 1 (January 2022)  

Public [article]  inIEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 60 n° 1 (January 2022) . - n° 4401514 Titre : A comparison of linear-mode and single-photon airborne LiDAR in species-specific forest inventories Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Janne Raty, Auteur ; Petri Varvia, Auteur ; Lauri Korhonen, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : n° 4401514 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Lasergrammétrie [Termes IGN] altitude [Termes IGN] analyse comparative [Termes IGN] capteur linéaire [Termes IGN] carte de la végétation [Termes IGN] données lidar [Termes IGN] données localisées 3D [Termes IGN] Finlande [Termes IGN] forêt boréale [Termes IGN] instrumentation Leica [Termes IGN] instrumentation Riegl [Termes IGN] inventaire forestier étranger (données) [Termes IGN] photon [Termes IGN] Pinophyta [Termes IGN] semis de points [Termes IGN] signal laser Résumé : (auteur) Single-photon airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems provide high-density data from high flight altitudes. We compared single-photon and linear-mode airborne LiDAR for the prediction of species-specific volumes in boreal coniferous-dominated forests. The LiDAR data sets were acquired at different flight altitudes using Leica SPL100 (single-photon, 17 points ⋅ m−2 ), Riegl VQ-1560i (linear-mode, 11 points ⋅ m−2 ), and Leica ALS60 (linear-mode, 0.6 points ⋅ m−2 ) LiDAR systems. Volumes were predicted at the plot-level using Gaussian process regression with predictor variables extracted from the LiDAR data sets and aerial images. Our findings showed that the Leica SPL100 produced a greater mean root-mean-squared error (RMSE) value (41.7 m3 ⋅ ha −1 ) than the Leica ALS60 (39.3 m3 ⋅ ha −1 ) in the prediction of species-specific volumes. Correspondingly, the Riegl VQ-1560i (mean RMSE = 33.0 m3 ⋅ ha −1 ) outperformed both the Leica ALS60 and the Leica SPL100. We found that the cumulative distributions of the first echo heights >1.3 m were rather similar among the data sets, whereas the last echo distributions showed larger differences. We conclude that the Leica SPL100 data set is suitable for area-based LiDAR inventory by tree species although the prediction errors are greater than with data obtained using the modern linear-mode LiDAR, such as Riegl VQ-1560i. Numéro de notice : A2022-026 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3060670 Date de publication en ligne : 04/03/2021 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3060670 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=99257 [article]

Sensor modelling and validation for linear array aerial and satellite imagery / Sultan Aksakal Kocaman (2009)  

Public Titre : Sensor modelling and validation for linear array aerial and satellite imagery Type de document : Thèse/HDR Auteurs : Sultan Aksakal Kocaman, Auteur ; Armin W. Gruen, Directeur de thèse ; Christian Heipke, Directeur de thèse Editeur : Zurich : Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammetrie IGP - ETH Année de publication : 2009 Collection : IGP Mitteilungen, ISSN 0252-9335 num. 106 Importance : 166 p. Format : 21 x 30 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-3-906467-88-7 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Acquisition d'image(s) et de donnée(s) [Termes IGN] ADS40 [Termes IGN] capteur aérien [Termes IGN] capteur en peigne [Termes IGN] capteur linéaire [Termes IGN] capteur optique [Termes IGN] capteur spatial [Termes IGN] compensation par faisceaux [Termes IGN] détecteur à transfert de charge [Termes IGN] étalonnage de capteur (imagerie) [Termes IGN] image ALOS-PRISM [Termes IGN] modèle géométrique de prise de vue [Termes IGN] modélisation géométrique de prise de vue [Termes IGN] orientation du capteur [Termes IGN] Panchromatic Remote Sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping [Termes IGN] pouvoir de résolution géométrique Index. décimale : 35.13 Prises de vues par capteurs spatiaux Résumé : (Auteur) The Linear Array CCD technology is widely used in the new generation aerial photogrammetric sensors and also in the high-resolution satellite optical sensors. In comparison to the Matrix (frame/area) Array sensors, the Linear Array CCD sensors have smaller number of detectors to cover the same swath width. In addition, the flexibility is higher in the physical sensor design. The conventional film cameras used in aerial photogrammetry are manufactured in frame format. The first remote sensing sensors for Earth observation employed film cameras as well. The recent sensor technologies of the optical remote sensing satellites are replaced with the Linear Array CCDs. In case of the aerial photogrammetric sensors, medium and small format aerial cameras are produced only in the frame format. The development in large format cameras is twofold. The Linear Array CCD and Matrix Array CCD sensors have been present in the industry since the year 2000. Due to the geometric differences between the Linear Array cameras and the frame cameras, the conventional photogrammetric procedures for the geometric processing of the Linear Array CCD images should be redefined or newly developed. The trajectory modeling is one of the main concepts, which entered into the field of photogrammetry with the aerial and satellite pushbroom sensors. The modified collinearity equations are extended with mathematical functions to model the image trajectory in the bundle adjustment. This study encompasses the triangulation of Linear Array CCD images with the use of different trajectory models. The self-calibration models are partially adapted from the frame sensors in accordance with the physical structures of the Linear Array CCD sensors. In general, the triangulation and self-calibration of the aerial and the satellite Linear Array CCD images show similarities in terms of trajectory modeling and the physical definitions of the additional parameters. The main difference is in the number unknown parameters defined in the bundle adjustment, which is calculated as a function of the number of lenses, the trajectory model configuration, and the number of Linear Array CCDs used in the sensor. Therefore, similar sensor modeling and calibration approaches are applied in this study, with necessary adjustments for each system. In order to obtain high accuracy point positioning, high quality image trajectory measurement is crucial. The given trajectory can be modeled in the adjustment by using constant and linear correction parameters, as well as higher order polynomials. This study investigates the three different trajectory models with three different mathematical approaches. Two of the models are investigated at different levels of sophistication by altering the model parameters. Two different aerial Linear Array CCD sensors, the STARIMAGER of former Starlabo Corporation, Japan, and the ADS40 sensor of the Leica Geosystems, Heerbrugg, are used for the practical investigations. The PRISM (Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping) onboard of Japanese ALOS satellite launched by JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) in 2006 is the satellite Linear Array CCD sensor used for the application parts of this study. The two aerial Linear Array CCD sensors work with the TLS (Three-Line-Scanner) principle. Three or more Linear Array CCDs are located in the focal plane of a single lens with different viewing angles providing stereo capability. The PRISM sensor differs in the optical design with three camera heads, each associated with a different viewing angle. Due to the design differences between the sensors, two sets of additional 'parameters for self-calibration are applied in this study. The aerial TLS sensors share the same set of additional parameters due to similar interior geometries of the sensors. The self-calibration of the PRISM sensor uses a different set due to multiple lenses and also multiple CCD chips used to form each image line. The sensor orientation and calibration methods presented in this study are validated using a number of application datasets. The image datasets of the three sensors are acquired over specially established testfields. Triangulation results prove the importance of high quality trajectory measurements for accurate sensor orientation. When the given image trajectory has a low quality, a sophisticated trajectory model should be used together with a high number of ground control points. This study also shows that, despite their weaker sensor geometry, the Linear Array CCD sensors have reached the accuracy potential of the conventional frame imagery for point determination. In addition, similar to the conventional film sensors, self-calibration has proven as a powerful tool for modeling the systematic errors of the Linear Array CCD imagery, albeit the method should be applied with a great care. Note de contenu : 1 Introduction 1.1 Research Objectives 1.2 Review of Digital Optical Sensors 1.2.1 Point-based Sensors 1.2.2 Linear Array CCD Sensors 1.2.3 Frame Array CCD Sensors 1.3 Review of Sensor Calibration Approaches for Linear Array CCD Sensors 1.4 Review of Sensor Orientation Methods for Linear Array CCD Sensors 1.4.1 Direct vs. Indirect Georeferencing 1.4.2 Rigorous vs. Generic Models for Georeferencing 1.5 Quality Analysis and Validation for the Geometric Processing Methods 1.6 Outline 2 Characterizations of the Linear Array CCD Sensor Geometries 2.1 Optical System Specification 2.2 Line Geometry 2.3 Resolution Specification 2.3.1 Spatial Resolution 2.3.2 Radiometric Resolution 2.3.3 Spectral Resolution 2.3.4 Temporal Resolutions of Satellite Sensors 2.4 Operation Principles 2.4.1 Sensor and Platform Synchronization 2.4.2 Stereo Acquisition 2.4.3 Platform Stabilization 3 Calibration Parameters for the Linear Array CCD Sensors . 3.1 Optical System Related Parameters 3.1.1 Principal Point Displacement 3.1.2 Camera Constant 3.1.3 Lens Distortions 3.2 CCD Line Related Parameters 3.2.1 Scale effect 3.2.2 Rotation 3.2.3 Displacement from the Principal Point 3.2.4 Bending 4 Methodology for Sensor Orientation and Calibration 4.1 Preparation for Rigorous Sensor Orientation 4.1.1 Image Trajectory Extraction 4.1.2 Interior Orientation Extraction 4.1.3 Coordinate System Transformations 4.2 Rigorous Sensor Orientation 4.2.1 Modified Bundle Adjustment with Trajectory Modeling 4.2.2 Self-calibration Method 4.2.3 Weighting Scheme of the Bundle Adjustment 4.2.4 Accuracy Assessment of the Bundle Adjustment 4.2.5 Processing time 5 Applications 5.1 Starlmager Sensor 5.1.1 Applications over the Yoriichio Testfield, Japan 5.1.2 Findings and Discussion 5.2 ADS40 Sensor 5.2.1 Applications to Testfields 5.2.2 Findings and Discussion 5.3 The ALOS/PRISM Sensor 5.3.1 Introduction 5.3.2 Applications to Testfields 5.3.3 Findings and Discussion 6 Conclusions and Outlook 6.1 Summary 6.2 Conclusions 6.3 Recommendations for Future Work Numéro de notice : 15509 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Thèse étrangère En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005780510 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=62742

Exemplaires(1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
15509-01	35.13	Livre	Centre de documentation	En réserve M-103	Disponible

Les cameras numériques aéroportées / Gordon Petrie in Géomatique expert, n° 41- 42 (01/03/2005) 

Public [article]  inGéomatique expert > n° 41- 42 (01/03/2005) . - pp 50 - 61 Titre : Les cameras numériques aéroportées Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gordon Petrie, Auteur Année de publication : 2005 Article en page(s) : pp 50 - 61 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Acquisition d'image(s) et de donnée(s) [Termes IGN] caméra matricielle [Termes IGN] caméra numérique [Termes IGN] capteur à balayage [Termes IGN] capteur aérien [Termes IGN] capteur linéaire [Termes IGN] chambre CMOS [Termes IGN] chambre DTC [Termes IGN] détecteur CMOS [Termes IGN] géoréférencement [Termes IGN] image multibande [Termes IGN] photographie aérienne Résumé : (Editeur) Le professeur Gordon PETRIE, du département de géographie et géomatique de l'Université de Glasgow, nous dresse un état des lieux des différents types de caméras numériques actuellement en cours d'utilisation et de développement pour la photographie aérienne. Numéro de notice : A2005-111 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : sans Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27249 [article]

Exemplaires(1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
265-05021	RAB	Revue	Centre de documentation	Revues en salle	Disponible

Documents numériques

en open access a2005-111_cameras_numeriques_petrie.pdf Adobe Acrobat PDF