Geomatica / Canadian institute of geomatics = Association canadienne des sciences géomatiques (Canada) . vol 70 n° 1Paru le : 01/03/2016 |
[n° ou bulletin]
est un bulletin de Geomatica / Canadian institute of geomatics = Association canadienne des sciences géomatiques (Canada) (1993 -)
[n° ou bulletin]
|
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panierThe Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013) / Marc Véronneau in Geomatica, vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016)
[article]
Titre : The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013) Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Marc Véronneau, Auteur ; Jianliang Huang, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 9 - 19 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] Canada
[Termes IGN] géoïde altimétrique
[Termes IGN] géoïde gravimétrique
[Termes IGN] géoïde local
[Termes IGN] mise à jour
[Termes IGN] nivellement
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] repère de nivellement
[Termes IGN] système de référence géodésique
[Termes IGN] système de référence localRésumé : (auteur) The Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013) is the first major update to the vertical datum in Canada in almost 100 years. Canada is not only moving to a new vertical datum, but it is also using a modernized approach to realize it. The modernization of the height reference system is necessary to make it compatible with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), which is commonly used for positioning by a growing number of users across Canada and the world. The geodetic levelling technique, which established a nation-wide network of benchmarks with known elevations, is replaced by a geoid model that describes the vertical datum with respect to an ellipsoid, which is the reference surface for GNSS positioning. Technically, height modernization replaces the need for the maintenance of benchmarks, as users can now install their own
markers at more convenient locations using GNSS. The current geoid model for CGVD2013 is the Canadian
Gravimetric Geoid 2013 (CGG2013.Numéro de notice : A2016-432 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.5623/cig2016-101 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.5623/cig2016-101 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81329
in Geomatica > vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016) . - pp 9 - 19[article]Spatial accuracy of UAV- derived orthoimagery and topography: Comparing photogrammetric models processed with direct geo-referencing and ground control points / Chris H. Hugenholtz in Geomatica, vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016)
[article]
Titre : Spatial accuracy of UAV- derived orthoimagery and topography: Comparing photogrammetric models processed with direct geo-referencing and ground control points Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Chris H. Hugenholtz, Auteur ; Owen Brown, Auteur ; Jordan Walker, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 21 - 30 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications photogrammétriques
[Termes IGN] acquisition de données
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] capteur aérien
[Termes IGN] drone
[Termes IGN] géoréférencement direct
[Termes IGN] point d'appui
[Termes IGN] positionnement cinématique en temps réel
[Termes IGN] positionnement inertiel
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes IGN] qualité des données
[Termes IGN] réalité de terrain
[Termes IGN] topographieRésumé : (auteur) Mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) typically involves the deployment of ground control points (GCPs) to georeference the images and topographic model. An alternative approach is direct georeferencing, whereby the onboard Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and inertial measurement unit are used without GCPs to locate and orient the data. This study compares the spatial accuracy of these approaches using two nearly identical UAVs. The onboard GNSS is the one difference between them, as one vehicle uses a survey-grade GNSS/RTK receiver (RTK UAV), while the other uses a lower-grade GPS receiver (non-RTK UAV). Field testing was performed at a gravel pit, with all ground measurements and aerial surveying completed on the same day. Three sets of orthoimages and DSMs were produced for comparing spatial accuracies: two sets were created by direct georeferencing images from the RTK UAV and non-RTK UAV and one set was created by using GCPs during the external orientation of the non-RTK UAV images. Spatial accuracy was determined from the horizontal (X,Y) and vertical (Z) residuals and root-mean-square-errors (RMSE) relative to 17 horizontal and 180 vertical check points measured with a GNSS/RTK base station and rover. For the two direct georeferencing datasets, the horizontal and vertical accuracy improved substantially with the survey-grade GNSS/RTK receiver onboard the RTK UAV, effectively reducing the RMSE values in X, Y and Z by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude compared to the lower grade GPS receiver onboard the non-RTK UAV. Importantly, the horizontal accuracy of the RTK UAV data processed via direct georeferencing was equivalent to the horizontal accuracy of the non-RTK UAV data processed with GCPs, but the vertical error of the DSM from the RTK UAV data was 2 to 3 times greater than the DSM from the non-RTK data with GCPs. Overall, results suggest that direct georeferencing with the RTK UAV can achieve horizontal accuracy comparable to that obtained with a network of GCPs, but for topographic measurements requiring the highest achievable accuracy, researchers and practitioners should use GCPs. Numéro de notice : A2016-433 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE/POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.5623/cig2016-102 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.5623/cig2016-102 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81330
in Geomatica > vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016) . - pp 21 - 30[article]GEOWAPP : a geospatial web application for lab exercises in surveying / Jaime Garbanzo-León in Geomatica, vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016)
[article]
Titre : GEOWAPP : a geospatial web application for lab exercises in surveying Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Jaime Garbanzo-León, Auteur ; Robert Kingdon, Auteur ; Emmanuel Stefanakis, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 31 - 42 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Topographie moderne
[Termes IGN] application informatique
[Termes IGN] application métier
[Termes IGN] exercice
[Termes IGN] formation à distanceRésumé : (auteur) E-learning applications that allow students to review their survey data are not widely used in surveying Engineering. To design and develop such an application, the requirements to be studied include user interactions, technology interactions, existing exercises, data representation, etc. This study comprises the process of designing, developing, and testing a geospatial web application (GEOWAPP), which is intended to be under the adjunct mode of e-learning. Four exercises were supported by GEOWAPP: two levelling exercises, a traversing and a topographic survey exercise. The GEOWAPP contains five tools: Traversing Comparator, Differential Levelling Comparator, Least Squares Levelling Tool, Vertical Comparator, and Proximity Comparator. After testing using surveying real data and book exercise data, the GEOWAPP functionality was found operational. Finally, user reviews were favourable towards the GEOWAPP. This application provides a new way to support surveying exercise lab practices by delivering immediate feedback. Numéro de notice : A2016-434 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT/SOCIETE NUMERIQUE Nature : Article DOI : 10.5623/cig2016-103 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.5623/cig2016-103 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81331
in Geomatica > vol 70 n° 1 (March 2016) . - pp 31 - 42[article]