Cartographic journal (the) / British cartographic society . Vol 53 n° 4Mention de date : November 2016 Paru le : 01/11/2016 |
[n° ou bulletin]
[n° ou bulletin]
|
Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres | Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
030-2016041 | RAB | Revue | Centre de documentation | En réserve L003 | Disponible |
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panierA shared perspective for PGIS and VGI / Jeroen Verplanke in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 4 (November 2016)
[article]
Titre : A shared perspective for PGIS and VGI Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Jeroen Verplanke, Auteur ; Claudia Uberhuaga, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 308 - 317 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes d'information géographique
[Termes IGN] données localisées des bénévoles
[Termes IGN] GeoWeb
[Termes IGN] participation du public
[Termes IGN] SIG participatifRésumé : (Auteur) This paper reviews persistent principles of participation processes. On the basis of a review of recent interrogations of the (Public) Participatory Geographic Information Systems (P)PGIS and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) approaches, a summary of five prevailing principles in participatory spatial information handling is presented. We investigate these five principles that are common to (P)PGIS and VGI on the basis of a framework of two dimensions that govern the participatory use of spatial information from the perspective of people and society. This framework is presented as a shared perspective of (P)PGIS and VGI and illustrates that, although both share many of these same principles, the ways in which these principles are approached are highly diverse. The paper ends with a future outlook in which we discuss the inter-connected memes of potential technological futures, the signification of localness in ‘local spatial knowledge’, and the ramifications of ethical tenets by which PGIS and VGI can strengthen each other as two sides of the same coin. Numéro de notice : A2016--005 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00087041.2016.1227552 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1227552 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=83830
in Cartographic journal (the) > Vol 53 n° 4 (November 2016) . - pp 308 - 317[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 030-2016041 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible Upside-down GIS : the future of citizen science and community participation / M.M. Thompson in Cartographic journal (the), Vol 53 n° 4 (November 2016)
[article]
Titre : Upside-down GIS : the future of citizen science and community participation Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : M.M. Thompson, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 326 - 334 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes d'information géographique
[Termes IGN] citoyen
[Termes IGN] norme de données localisées
[Termes IGN] participation du public
[Termes IGN] SIG participatifRésumé : (Auteur) This article will focus on the changes in time, technology and data that have affected traditional partner relationships using participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Project development roles of reliance held by the community, and managed by university agents, has shifted from cooperative to, in some cases, complete independence. The modern model of citizen participation includes a resident-planner toolkit with greater access to neighbourhood data and low- to high-tech analytical tools. Many community-led quality of life studies have a limited scope and focus on policy issues that do not serve a larger constituency. Many neighbourhood plans exclude self-reported neighbourhood knowledge and, due to the frequency of municipal reporting cycles, leaves gaps and data mismatch. Given this, the traditional public participation GIS (PPGIS) model may be less data driven due to a more mission-driven resident-led PGIS solution. Planners in practice and in academia have raised levels of concern about data standards, interoperability, reliability, error and metadata. How and why Citizen Science influenced the progression of PPGIS, participation GIS, crowdsourcing and now community-managed data in both theory and practice are provided. This paper will reflect on how top-down strategies to include neighbourhood knowledge are being reframed by the United States Federal Community of Practice. The future of data integration focuses on both the process and products of data development from both the bottom-up and top-down perspectives. Numéro de notice : A2016--006 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00087041.2016.1243863 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243863 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=83831
in Cartographic journal (the) > Vol 53 n° 4 (November 2016) . - pp 326 - 334[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 030-2016041 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible