Centre de documentation
scientifique

Dépouillements

Stand-level wind damage can be assessed using diachronic photogrammetric canopy height models / Jean-Pierre Renaud in Annals of Forest Science, vol 74 n° 4 (December 2017)  

Public [article]  inAnnals of Forest Science > vol 74 n° 4 (December 2017) Titre : Stand-level wind damage can be assessed using diachronic photogrammetric canopy height models Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Jean-Pierre Renaud , Auteur ; Cédric Vega , Auteur ; Sylvie Durrieu, Auteur ; Jonathan Lisein , Auteur ; Magnussen, Steen, Auteur ; Philippe Lejeune, Auteur ; Meriem Fournier, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Projets : FOR-WIND / Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] analyse diachronique [Termes IGN] appariement dense [Termes IGN] dommage matériel [Termes IGN] hauteur des arbres [Termes IGN] image aérienne [Termes IGN] modèle numérique de surface de la canopée [Termes IGN] photogrammétrie [Termes IGN] placette d'échantillonnage [Termes IGN] semis de points [Termes IGN] tempête [Termes IGN] volume en bois [Vedettes matières IGN] Inventaire forestier Résumé : (auteur) Key message : Diachronic photogrammetric canopy height models can be used to quantify at a fine scale changes in dominant height and wood volume following storms. The regular renewal of aerial surveys makes this approach appealing for monitoring forest changes. Context : The increasing availability of aerial photographs and the development of dense matching algorithms open up new possibilities to assess the effects of storm events on forest canopies. Aims : The objective of this research is to assess the potential of diachronic canopy height models derived from photogrammetric point clouds (PCHM) to quantify changes in dominant height and wood volume of a broadleaved forest following a major storm. Methods : PCHMs derived from aerial photographs acquired before and after a storm event were calibrated using 25 field plots to estimate dominant height and volume using various modeling approaches. The calibrated models were combined with a reference damage maps to estimate both the within-stand damage variability, and the amount of volume impacted. Results : Dominant height was predicted with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 4%, and volume with RMSEs ranging from 24 to 32% according to the type of model. The volume impacted by storm was in the range of 42–76%. Overall, the maps of dominant height changes provided more details about within-stand damage variability than conventional photointerpretation do. Conclusion : The study suggests a promising potential for exploiting PCHM in pursuit of a rapid localization and quantification of wind-throw damages, given an adapted sampling design to calibrate models. Numéro de notice : A2017-733 Affiliation des auteurs : LIF+Ext (2012-2019) Thématique : FORET Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s13595-017-0669-3 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0669-3 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=88546 [article]