Centre de documentation
scientifique

Editorial / Pascal Willis in Advances in space research, vol 67 n° 1 (January 2021)  

Public [article]  inAdvances in space research > vol 67 n° 1 (January 2021) . - pp 1 - 1 Titre : Editorial Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Pascal Willis , Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Projets : 1-Pas de projet / Article en page(s) : pp 1 - 1 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] évaluation par les pairs Numéro de notice : A2021-068 Affiliation des auteurs : UMR IPGP-Géod (2020- ) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtSansCL DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.009 Date de publication en ligne : 16/12/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.009 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97004 [article]

The reviewing process for ISPRS events / Clément Mallet in ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol IV-5 (November 2018)  

Public [article]  inISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences > vol IV-5 (November 2018) . - pp 53 - 58 Titre : The reviewing process for ISPRS events Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Clément Mallet , Auteur ; Ian J. Dowman, Auteur ; M. George Vosselman, Auteur ; Uwe Stilla, Auteur ; Lena Halounova, Auteur ; Nicolas Paparoditis , Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Projets : 1-Pas de projet / Conférence : ISPRS 2018, TC IV Mid-term Symposium 3D Spatial Information Science, The Engine of Change 01/10/2018 05/10/2018 Delft Pays-Bas OA ISPRS Annals Article en page(s) : pp 53 - 58 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Documentation [Termes IGN] évaluation par les pairs [Termes IGN] publication Résumé : (auteur) Following the first initiatives taken by the International Programme Committee of the XXIIIrd ISPRS Congress in Prague (Czech Republic) in 2016, modifications of the reviewing process of ISPRS events were further considered during the years 2017 and 2018. This evolution first targets to better fit such a process to the currents requirements and expectations of the ISPRS community. Secondly, it aims to provide unified guidelines for the different steps of the process. Under the aegis of the 2020 Congress Director and ISAC (International Science Advisory Committee) chair, several discussions were held in-between September 2017 and June 2018 with ISAC members, Technical Commission Presidents (TCP), council members, 2016 and 2020 Congress Programme Chairs. This document serves as a unique transparent basis that applies for all kinds of ISPRS events (from Congress and Geospatial Week to smaller workshops), and all categories of people that are bound to be involved in the evaluation process of scientific contributions (authors, reviewers, TCPs, … ). It also specifies the evaluation criteria for the works submitted to ISPRS events, both for full papers and abstracts. Subsequently, it helps authors to improve the content and shape of their contributions. Eventually, this paper is targeted to help new chairs to smoothly prepare their future event. The following guidelines were first adopted for the 2018 Technical Commission Symposia. Numéro de notice : A2018-535 Affiliation des auteurs : LASTIG MATIS+Ext (2012-2019) Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-53-2018 Date de publication en ligne : 15/11/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-53-2018 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=91265 [article]

What's next for peer review? / Anonyme in Research information, n° 82 (February - March 2016) 

Public [article]  inResearch information > n° 82 (February - March 2016) . - pp 12 - 14 Titre : What's next for peer review? Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Anonyme, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 12 - 14 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Société de l'information [Termes IGN] évaluation par les pairs [Termes IGN] recherche scientifique Résumé : (éditeur) Six industry figures give their take on recent developments in the world of peer review, and some predictions for the years ahead Numéro de notice : A2016-083 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : SOCIETE NUMERIQUE Nature : Article DOI : sans Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=79836 [article]

Documents numériques

peut être téléchargé What's next for peer review? Adobe Acrobat PDF

Evaluating maps in a massive open online course [mooc] / Anthony C. Robinson in Cartographic perspectives, n° 80 (2015)  

Public [article]  inCartographic perspectives > n° 80 (2015) . - pp 6 - 17 Titre : Evaluating maps in a massive open online course [mooc] Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Anthony C. Robinson, Auteur ; Jonathan K. Nelson, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp 6 - 17 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Formation [Termes IGN] apprentissage en ligne [Termes IGN] cartographie [Termes IGN] cours en ligne ouverts à tous [Termes IGN] évaluation par les pairs Résumé : (auteur) New forms of cartographic education are becoming possible with the synthesis of easy to use web GIS tools and learning platforms that support online education at a massive scale. The internet classroom can now support tens of thousands of learners at a time, and while some common types of assessments scale very easily, others face significant hurdles. A particular concern for the cartographic educator is the extent to which original map designs can be evaluated in a massive open online course (MOOC). Based on our experiences in teaching one of the first MOOCs on cartography, we explore the ways in which very large collections of original map designs can be assessed. Our methods include analysis of peer grades and qualitative feedback, visual techniques to explore design methods, and quantitative comparison between expert ratings and peer grades. The results of our work suggest key challenges for teaching cartography at scale where instructors cannot provide individual feedback for every student. Numéro de notice : A2015--076 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article DOI : 10.14714/CP80.1299 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.14714/CP80.1299 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=83984 [article]