Centre de documentation
scientifique

Dépouillements

Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser scanning based inventory using calibrated predictions from external models / Ana de Lera Garrido in Silva fennica, vol 56 n° 2 (April 2022)  

Public [article]  inSilva fennica > vol 56 n° 2 (April 2022) . - n° 10695 Titre : Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser scanning based inventory using calibrated predictions from external models Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Ana de Lera Garrido, Auteur ; Terje Gobakken, Auteur ; Hans Ole Ørka, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : n° 10695 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Lasergrammétrie [Termes IGN] diamètre à hauteur de poitrine [Termes IGN] données lidar [Termes IGN] données localisées 3D [Termes IGN] étalonnage [Termes IGN] hauteur des arbres [Termes IGN] inventaire forestier étranger (données) [Termes IGN] modèle de simulation [Termes IGN] modélisation spatio-temporelle [Termes IGN] Norvège [Termes IGN] parcelle forestière [Termes IGN] placette d'échantillonnage [Termes IGN] semis de points [Termes IGN] volume en bois Résumé : (auteur) Forest management inventories assisted by airborne laser scanner data rely on predictive models traditionally constructed and applied based on data from the same area of interest. However, forest attributes can also be predicted using models constructed with data external to where the model is applied, both temporal and geographically. When external models are used, many factors influence the predictions’ accuracy and may cause systematic errors. In this study, volume, stem number, and dominant height were estimated using external model predictions calibrated using a reduced number of up-to-date local field plots or using predictions from reparametrized models. We assessed and compared the performance of three different calibration approaches for both temporally and spatially external models. Each of the three approaches was applied with different numbers of calibration plots in a simulation, and the accuracy was assessed using independent validation data. The primary findings were that local calibration reduced the relative mean difference in 89% of the cases, and the relative root mean squared error in 56% of the cases. Differences between application of temporally or spatially external models were minor, and when the number of local plots was small, calibration approaches based on the observed prediction errors on the up-to-date local field plots were better than using the reparametrized models. The results showed that the estimates resulting from calibrating external models with 20 plots were at the same level of accuracy as those resulting from a new inventory. Numéro de notice : A2022-367 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.14214/sf.10695 Date de publication en ligne : 25/04/2022 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10695 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=100589 [article]