|
[n° ou bulletin]
est un bulletin de Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS / American society for photogrammetry and remote sensing (1975 -) ![]()
[n° ou bulletin]
| ![]() |
Dépouillements
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
Comparative analysis of different CNN models for building segmentation from satellite and UAV images / Batuhan Sariturk in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS, vol 89 n° 2 (February 2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Comparative analysis of different CNN models for building segmentation from satellite and UAV images Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Batuhan Sariturk, Auteur ; Damla Kumbasar, Auteur ; Dursun Zafer Seker, Auteur Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : pp 97 - 105 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement d'image optique
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] bati
[Termes IGN] classification par réseau neuronal convolutif
[Termes IGN] données d'entrainement (apprentissage automatique)
[Termes IGN] image captée par drone
[Termes IGN] image satellite
[Termes IGN] segmentation sémantiqueRésumé : (auteur) Building segmentation has numerous application areas such as urban planning and disaster management. In this study, 12 CNN models (U-Net, FPN, and LinkNet using EfficientNet-B5 backbone, U-Net, SegNet, FCN, and six Residual U-Net models) were generated and used for building segmentation. Inria Aerial Image Labeling Data Set was used to train models, and three data sets (Inria Aerial Image Labeling Data Set, Massachusetts Buildings Data Set, and Syedra Archaeological Site Data Set) were used to evaluate trained models. On the Inria test set, Residual-2 U-Net has the highest F1 and Intersection over Union (IoU) scores with 0.824 and 0.722, respectively. On the Syedra test set, LinkNet-EfficientNet-B5 has F1 and IoU scores of 0.336 and 0.246. On the Massachusetts test set, Residual-4 U-Net has F1 and IoU scores of 0.394 and 0.259. It has been observed that, for all sets, at least two of the top three models used residual connections. Therefore, for this study, residual connections are more successful than conventional convolutional layers. Numéro de notice : A2023-143 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.14358/PERS.22-00084R2 Date de publication en ligne : 01/02/2023 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.22-00084R2 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=102718
in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS > vol 89 n° 2 (February 2023) . - pp 97 - 105[article]