Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Oskar Sterle |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Single-frequency precise point positioning: an analytical approach / Oskar Sterle in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 8 (August 2015)
[article]
Titre : Single-frequency precise point positioning: an analytical approach Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Oskar Sterle, Auteur ; Bojan Stopar, Auteur ; Polona Pavlovčič Prešeren, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp 793-810 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] analyse de données
[Termes IGN] coordonnées géographiques
[Termes IGN] horloge
[Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes IGN] propagation troposphérique
[Termes IGN] récepteur monofréquence
[Termes IGN] station permanente
[Termes IGN] transformation de Helmert
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (auteur) An analytical approach to single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) is discussed in this paper. To obtain highest precision results, all biases must be eliminated or modelled to centimetre level. The use of the GRAPHIC ionosphere-free linear combination that is based on single-frequency phase and code observations eliminates the ionosphere bias; however, the rank deficient Gauss–Markov model is obtained. We explicitly determine rank deficiency of a Gauss–Markov model as a number of all ambiguity clusters, each of them defined as a set of all ambiguities overlapping in time. On the basis of S-transformation we prove that the single-frequency PPP represents an unbiased estimator for station coordinates and troposphere parameters, while it presents a biased estimator for ambiguities and receiver-clock error parameters. Additionally we describe the estimable parameters in each ambiguity cluster as the differences between ambiguity parameters and the sum of receiver-clock parameters with one of the ambiguities. We also show that any other particular solution on the basis of S-transformation is obtained only when the common least-squares estimation in single step is applied. The recursive least-squares estimation with parameter pre-elimination only determines the vector of unknowns as possible to transform through S-transformation, whereas the same does not hold for the cofactor matrix of unknowns. For a case study, we present our method on GPS data from 19 permanent stations (14 IGS and 5 EPN) in Europe, for 89 consecutive days in the beginning of 2013. The static case study revealed the precision of daily coordinates as 7.6, 11.7 and 19.6 mm for N, E and U, respectively. The accuracies of the N, E and U components were determined as 6.9, 13.5 and 31.4 mm, respectively, and were calculated using the Helmert transformation of weighted-mean daily single-frequency PPP and IGb08 coordinates. The estimated convergence times were relatively diverse, expanding from 1.75 h (CAGL) to 5.25 h (GRAZ) for the horizontal position with the 10-cm precision threshold, and from 1.00 h (GRAS) to 3.25 h (BZRG) for the height component with a 20-cm precision threshold. The convergence times were shown to be strongly correlated to the remaining unmodelled biases in the GRAPHIC linear combination, primarily with multipath, where the correlation coefficient for the horizontal position was determined as ρP = 0.68 and for height as ρU = 0.85. The comparison to the model where raw observations are used (C, L) and where the ionosphere bias is mitigated with global ionosphere models (GIM) revealed the supremacy of the proposed single-frequency PPP method based on the GRAPHIC linear combination in both the static and the semi-kinematic case study. In the static case study, the proposed single-frequency PPP model was superior both in terms of precision and accuracy. In the semi-kinematic case study, the usage of raw observations with GIM would improve results only when multipath and noise of code observations would prevail over the remaining ionosphere bias, i.e. after applying GIM. Numéro de notice : A2015-377 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-015-0816-2 Date de publication en ligne : 29/04/2015 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0816-2 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=76855
in Journal of geodesy > vol 89 n° 8 (August 2015) . - pp 793-810[article]