Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Z. Adamec |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Comparison of linear mixed effects model and generalized model of the tree height-diameter relationship / Z. Adamec in Journal of forest science, vol 61 n° 10 (October 2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Comparison of linear mixed effects model and generalized model of the tree height-diameter relationship Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Z. Adamec, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp 439 – 447 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Végétation
[Termes IGN] étalonnage de modèle
[Termes IGN] hauteur des arbres
[Termes IGN] modèle linéaire
[Termes IGN] Picea abiesRésumé : (auteur) Models of height curves generated using a linear mixed effects model and generalized model were compared. Both tested models were also compared with local models of height curves, which were fitted using a nonlinear regression. In the mixed model two versions of calibration were tested. The first calibration approach was based on measurement of heights only in trees of the mean diameter interval, while the second calibration approach was based on measurement of tree heights in three diameter intervals. Generalized model is the mathematical formulation of a system of uniform height curves, which is commonly used in the Czech Republic. The study took place at Training Forest Enterprise called Masaryk Forest at Křtiny and was carried out for Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). It was found that the mixed model behaves correctly only in the case of calibration based on selection of trees in three diameter intervals. Selection of a total of nine trees was confirmed as the most suitable to calibrate the model. In most of the calculated quality criteria, the mixed model achieved better results than the generalized model, even with a smaller number of measured heights. The bias of both models from the local model was very similar (0.54 m for the mixed model and 0.44 m for the generalized model). The mixed model can therefore fully replace the commonly used generalized model even with a smaller number of measured heights. Numéro de notice : A2015-670 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET Nature : Article DOI : 10.17221/68/2015-JFS En ligne : https://doi.org/10.17221/68/2015-JFS Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=78284
in Journal of forest science > vol 61 n° 10 (October 2015) . - pp 439 – 447[article]