Centre de documentation
scientifique

Mapping areas of asynchronous‐temporal interaction in animal‐telemetry data / Brendan A. Hoover in Transactions in GIS, Vol 24 n° 3 (June 2020)  

Public [article]  inTransactions in GIS > Vol 24 n° 3 (June 2020) . - pp 573 - 586 Titre : Mapping areas of asynchronous‐temporal interaction in animal‐telemetry data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Brendan A. Hoover, Auteur ; Jennifer A. Miller, Auteur ; Jed A. Long, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 573 - 586 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Analyse spatiale [Termes IGN] analyse spatio-temporelle [Termes IGN] comportement [Termes IGN] écologie [Termes IGN] habitat animal [Termes IGN] interaction spatiale [Termes IGN] maladie animale [Termes IGN] migration animale [Termes IGN] population animale [Termes IGN] Time-geography Résumé : (Auteur) Animal interactions are a crucial aspect of behavioral ecology that affect mating, territorial behavior, resource use, and disease spread. Commonly, animals will interact because of shared resources. Recent methods have used time geography to map landscape areas where interactions were possible. However, such methods do not identify areas of less direct interaction, like through smell or sight. These indirect or asynchronous interactions are also a crucial aspect of animal behavioral ecology and affect group behaviors such as leading/following hierarchies and joint resource use. Asynchronous interactions are difficult to map because they can occur in a synchronous space at asynchronous times, as well as in asynchronous spaces at a synchronous time. Here, we present a method termed the temporally asynchronous‐joint potential path area (ta‐jPPA) that maps areas of potential temporally asynchronous–spatially synchronous interactions. We used simulated data to statistically test ta‐jPPA and empirical data to demonstrate how ta‐jPPA can find patterns in habitat use. Numéro de notice : A2020-246 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1111/tgis.12622 Date de publication en ligne : 05/05/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12622 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95308 [article]

Incorporating movement in species distribution models: how do simulations of dispersal affect the accuracy and uncertainty of projections? / Paul Holloway in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 30 n° 9-10 (September - October 2016)  

Public [article]  inInternational journal of geographical information science IJGIS > vol 30 n° 9-10 (September - October 2016) . - pp 2050 - 2074 Titre : Incorporating movement in species distribution models: how do simulations of dispersal affect the accuracy and uncertainty of projections? Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Paul Holloway, Auteur ; Jennifer A. Miller, Auteur ; Simon Gillings, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 2050 - 2074 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Analyse spatiale [Termes IGN] Aves [Termes IGN] changement climatique [Termes IGN] distribution spatiale [Termes IGN] Grande-Bretagne [Termes IGN] habitat d'espèce [Termes IGN] incertitude des données [Termes IGN] modèle de dispersion [Termes IGN] système d'information géographique Résumé : (Auteur) Species distribution models (SDMs) are one of the most important GIScience research areas in biogeography and are the primary means by which the potential effects of climate change on species’ distributions and ranges are investigated. Dispersal is an important ecological process for species responding to changing climates, however, SDMs and their subsequent spatial products rarely reflect accessibility to any future suitable environment. Dispersal-related movement can be confounded by factors that vary across landscapes and climates, as well as within and among species, and it has therefore remained difficult to parametrise in SDMs. Here we compared 20 models that have previously been used (or have the potential to be used) to represent dispersal processes in SDM to predict future range shifts in response to climate change. We assessed the different dispersal models in terms of their accuracy at predicting future distributions, as well as the uncertainty associated with their predictions. Atlas data for 50 bird species from 1988 to 1991 in Great Britain were treated as base distributions (t1), with the species–environment relationships extrapolated (using three commonly used statistical methods) to 2008–2011 (t2). Dispersal (in the form of the 20 different models) was simulated from the base distribution (t1) to 2008–2011 (t2). The results were then combined and used to identify locations that were both abiotically suitable (obtained from the statistical methods) and accessible (obtained from the dispersal models). The accuracy of these coupled projections was assessed with the 2008–2011 atlas data (the observed t2 distribution). There was substantial variation in the accuracy of the different dispersal models, and in general, the more restrictive dispersal models (e.g. fixed rate dispersal) resulted in lower accuracy for the metrics which reward correct prediction of presences. Ensemble models of the dispersal methods (generated by combining multiple projection outcomes) were created for each species, and a new Ensemble Agreement Index (EAI), which ranges from 0 (no agreement among models) to 1 (full agreement among models) was developed to quantify uncertainty among the projections. EAI values ranged from 0.634 (some areas of disagreement and therefore medium uncertainty among dispersal models) to 0.999 (large areas of agreement and low uncertainty among dispersal models). The results of this research highlight the importance of incorporating dispersal and also illustrate that the method with which dispersal is simulated greatly impacts the projected future distribution. This has important implications for studies aimed at predicting the effects of changing environmental conditions on species’ distributions. Numéro de notice : A2016-575 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/13658816.2016.1158823 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1158823 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81732 [article]

Exemplaires(1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
079-2016051	RAB	Revue	Centre de documentation	En réserve L003	Disponible