Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Nico Bakker |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software / Jantien E. Stoter in Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol 33 n° 5 (September 2009)
[article]
Titre : Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Jantien E. Stoter, Auteur ; Dirk Burghardt, Auteur ; Cécile Duchêne , Auteur ; Blanca Baella, Auteur ; Nico Bakker, Auteur ; Connie Blok, Auteur ; Maria Pla, Auteur ; Nicolas Regnauld , Auteur ; Guillaume Touya , Auteur ; Stefan Schmid, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : pp 311 - 324 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] état de l'art
[Termes IGN] évaluation
[Termes IGN] généralisation cartographique automatisée
[Termes IGN] logiciel de cartographie
[Vedettes matières IGN] GénéralisationMots-clés libres : NMA requirements for automated map generalization Evaluation of generalized data Constraint-based generalization State-of-the-art of generalization Résumé : (Auteur) This paper presents a methodology developed for a study to evaluate the state of the art of automated map generalization in commercial software without applying any customization. The objectives of this study are to learn more about generic and specific requirements for automated map generalization, to show possibilities and limitations of commercial generalization software, and to identify areas for further research. The methodology had to consider all types of heterogeneity to guarantee independent testing and evaluation of available generalization solutions. The paper presents the two main steps of the methodology. The first step is the analysis of map requirements for automated generalization, which consisted of sourcing representative test cases, defining map specifications in generalization constraints, harmonizing constraints across the test cases, and analyzing the types of constraints that were defined. The second step of the methodology is the evaluation of generalized outputs. In this step, three evaluation methods were integrated to balance between human and machine evaluation and to expose possible inconsistencies. In the discussion the applied methodology is evaluated and areas for further research are identified. Numéro de notice : A2009-672 Affiliation des auteurs : IGN+Ext (1940-2011) Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.06.002 Date de publication en ligne : 11/08/2009 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.06.002 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33578
in Computers, Environment and Urban Systems > vol 33 n° 5 (September 2009) . - pp 311 - 324[article]