Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Peter A. Johnson |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Who owns the map? Data sovereignty and government spatial data collection, use, and dissemination / Peter A. Johnson in Transactions in GIS, vol 27 n° 1 (February 2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Who owns the map? Data sovereignty and government spatial data collection, use, and dissemination Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Peter A. Johnson, Auteur ; Teresa Scassa, Auteur Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : pp 275 - 289 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées
[Termes IGN] carte
[Termes IGN] collecte de données
[Termes IGN] diffusion de données
[Termes IGN] domaine public
[Termes IGN] données localisées des bénévoles
[Termes IGN] données spatiotemporelles
[Termes IGN] droit d'auteur
[Termes IGN] OpenStreetMap
[Termes IGN] planification
[Termes IGN] pouvoirs publics
[Termes IGN] source de données
[Termes IGN] statut juridiqueRésumé : (auteur) Maps, created through the collection, assembly, and analysis of spatial data are used to support government planning and decision-making. Traditionally, spatial data used to create maps are collected, controlled, and disseminated by government, although over time, this role has shifted. This shift has been driven by the availability of alternate sources of data collected by private sector companies, and data contributed by volunteers to open mapping platforms, such as OpenStreetMap. In theorizing this shift, we provide examples of how governments use data sovereignty as a tool to shape spatial data collection, use, and sharing. We frame four models of how governments may navigate shifting spatial data sovereignty regimes; first, with government retaining complete control over data collection; second, with government contracting a third party to provide specific data collection services, but with data ownership and dissemination responsibilities resting with government; third, with government purchasing data under terms of access set by third party data collectors, who disseminate data to several parties, and finally, with government retreating from or relinquishing data sovereignty altogether. Within this rapidly changing landscape of data providers, we propose that governments must consider how to address data sovereignty concerns to retain their ability to control data use in the public interest. Numéro de notice : A2023-134 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1111/tgis.13024 Date de publication en ligne : 22/01/2023 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13024 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=102680
in Transactions in GIS > vol 27 n° 1 (February 2023) . - pp 275 - 289[article]The cost(s) of geospatial open data / Peter A. Johnson in Transactions in GIS, vol 21 n° 3 (June 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The cost(s) of geospatial open data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Peter A. Johnson, Auteur ; Renee Sieber, Auteur ; Teresa Scassa, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 434 - 445 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géomatique web
[Termes IGN] coût
[Termes IGN] données localisées
[Termes IGN] données ouvertes
[Termes IGN] données publiques
[Termes IGN] infrastructure nationale des données localiséesRésumé : (Auteur) The provision of open data by governments at all levels has rapidly increased over recent years. Given that one of the dominant motivations for the provision of open data is to generate ‘value’, both economic and civic, there are valid concerns over the costs incurred in this pursuit. Typically, costs of open data are framed as internal to the data providing government. Building on the strong history of GIScience research on data provision via spatial data infrastructures, this article considers both the direct and indirect costs of open data provision, framing four main areas of indirect costs: citizen participation challenges, uneven provision across geography and user types, subsidy of private sector activities, and the creation of inroads for corporate influence on government. These areas of indirect cost lead to the development of critical questions, including constituency, purpose, enablement, protection, and priorities. These questions are posed as a guide to governments that provide open data in addressing the indirect costs of open data. Numéro de notice : A2017-622 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1111/tgis.12283 En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12283 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=86932
in Transactions in GIS > vol 21 n° 3 (June 2017) . - pp 434 - 445[article]Models of direct editing of government spatial data: challenges and constraints to the acceptance of contributed data / Peter A. Johnson in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 44 n° 2 (March 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Models of direct editing of government spatial data: challenges and constraints to the acceptance of contributed data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Peter A. Johnson, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 128 - 138 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées
[Termes IGN] données localisées
[Termes IGN] données localisées des bénévoles
[Termes IGN] données ouvertes
[Termes IGN] éditique web
[Termes IGN] organisation non gouvernementale
[Termes IGN] sauvegarde informatiqueRésumé : (auteur) The current popularity of government open data platforms as a way to share geospatial data has created an opportunity for government to receive direct feedback and edits on this very same data. This research proposes four models that can define how government accepts direct edits and feedback on geospatial data. The four models are a “status quo” of open data provision, data curation, data mirroring, and crowdsourcing. These models are placed on a continuum of government control ranging from high levels of control over data creation to a low level of control. Each model is discussed, with relevant challenges highlighted. These four models present an initial suite of options for governments looking to accept direct edits from data end users and can be framed as a partial realization of many of the principles of open government. Despite the varied potential of these approaches, they generate a shift in locus of control away from government, creating several areas of risk for government. Of these models, near-term interest may focus on data curation and data mirroring as evolutionary, rather than revolutionary steps that expand on the simple provision of open data. Numéro de notice : A2017-103 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE/SOCIETE NUMERIQUE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1080/15230406.2016.1176536 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1176536 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84483
in Cartography and Geographic Information Science > Vol 44 n° 2 (March 2017) . - pp 128 - 138[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 032-2017021 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible