Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Franck Kamtchang |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Assessing the quality of GEOID12B model through field surveys / Ahmed F. Elaksher in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 12 n° 1 (January 2018)
[article]
Titre : Assessing the quality of GEOID12B model through field surveys Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Ahmed F. Elaksher, Auteur ; Franck Kamtchang, Auteur ; Christian Wegmann, Auteur ; Adalberto Guerrero, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : pp 1 - 14 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes IGN] altitude orthométrique
[Termes IGN] anomalie de pesanteur
[Termes IGN] Etats-Unis
[Termes IGN] géoïde local
[Termes IGN] hauteur ellipsoïdale
[Termes IGN] quasi-géoïdeRésumé : (auteur) Elevation differences have been determined through conventional ground surveying techniques for over a century. Since the mid-80s GPS, GLONASS and other satellite systems have modernized the means by which elevation differences are observed. In this article, we assessed the quality of GEIOD12B through long-occupation GNSS static surveys. A set of NGS benchmarks was occupied for at least one hour using dual-frequency GNSS receivers. Collected measurements were processed using a single CORS station at most 24 kilometers from the benchmarks. Geoid undulation values were driven by subtracting measured ellipsoidal heights from the orthometric heights posted on the NGS website. To assess the quality of GEOID12B, we compared our computed vertical shifts at the benchmarks with those estimated from GEOID12B published by NGS. In addition, Kriging model was used to interpolate local maps for the geoid undulations from the benchmark heights. The maps were compared with corresponding parts of GEOID12B. No biases were detected in the results and only shifts due to random errors were found. Discrepancies in the range of ten centimetres were noticed between our geoid undulation and the values available from NGS. Numéro de notice : A2018-013 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1515/jag-2017-0013 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0013 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=89092
in Journal of applied geodesy > vol 12 n° 1 (January 2018) . - pp 1 - 14[article]