Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Lifen Sui |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Performance of BDS triple-frequency positioning based on the modified TCAR method / Yijun Tian in Survey review, vol 52 n° 374 (August 2020)
[article]
Titre : Performance of BDS triple-frequency positioning based on the modified TCAR method Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Yijun Tian, Auteur ; Lifen Sui, Auteur ; Dongqing Zhao, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 415 - 422 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] compensation Lambda
[Termes IGN] filtre de Kalman
[Termes IGN] positionnement par BeiDou
[Termes IGN] précision du positionnement
[Termes IGN] résolution d'ambiguïté
[Termes IGN] retard ionosphèrique
[Termes IGN] triple différenceRésumé : (auteur) A modified TCAR method to improve the NL ambiguity resolution over medium-long baseline is presented. The estimated DD ionospheric delay derived from the Kalman-filter floating solution is adopted to modify the floating NL ambiguities. Modified by the smooth DD ionospheric delay, the NL ambiguity residuals are mostly within 0.5 cycles over medium-long baselines, showing a significant improvement in contrast to the classical TCAR method. The positioning performances of the modified method are even better than the LAMBDA method over 72 and 634 km baselines. As the ambiguity can be correctly fixed just after several epochs, high-precision positioning can be achieved in a very short time. Numéro de notice : A2020-517 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2019.1627507 Date de publication en ligne : 12/06/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1627507 Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95677
in Survey review > vol 52 n° 374 (August 2020) . - pp 415 - 422[article]Estimating and assessing Galileo satellite fractional cycle bias for PPP ambiguity resolution / Guorui Xiao in GPS solutions, vol 23 n° 1 (January 2019)
[article]
Titre : Estimating and assessing Galileo satellite fractional cycle bias for PPP ambiguity resolution Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Guorui Xiao, Auteur ; Pan Li, Auteur ; Lifen Sui, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] ambiguïté entière
[Termes IGN] données Galileo
[Termes IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes IGN] positionnement par Galileo
[Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes IGN] résolution d'ambiguïtéRésumé : (Auteur) Due to the rapid deployment of the Galileo constellation, Galileo is now able to contribute to GNSS precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR) with 17 operational satellites as of December 2017. We estimate the satellite fractional cycle bias (FCB) based on globally distributed MGEX stations and assess the Galileo FCB quality by a comparison with that of GPS and BDS. Results of 60 days indicate that the quality of Galileo wide-lane (WL) FCB is better than GPS and BDS in terms of data usage rate, residual distribution, as well as standard deviation of daily estimates. The RMS of Galileo WL FCB residuals is 0.071 cycles, while that of GPS and BDS are 0.089 and 0.117 cycles, respectively. The standard deviation of Galileo daily WL FCB is 0.010 cycles, while that of GPS and BDS is 0.018 and 0.043 cycles. We attribute the better quality of Galileo WL FCB to its signal modulation, AltBOC, which significantly compresses the multipath effect for pseudorange measurement. Within the Galileo constellation, the performance of In-Orbit Validation (IOV) satellites WL FCB is worse than that of Full Operational Capability (FOC) satellites as a result of a reduction in the power of the transmitted signal. The performance of the two highly eccentric satellites is comparable to other FOC satellites. The overall quality of Galileo narrow-lane (NL) FCB is slightly worse than that of GPS but better than that of BDS. The RMS of Galileo NL FCB residuals is 0.062 cycles, while that for GPS and BDS is 0.050 and 0.086 cycles respectively. In addition, the NL FCB quality of FOC, IOV (except E19), as well as the two eccentric satellites, shows no significant difference in terms of data usage rates and residuals. Galileo PPP AR solutions are conducted at 20 MGEX stations with 3-h sessions for 10 days. The positional biases of AR solutions are 0.7, 0.6, and 2.1 cm for east, north and up components respectively, while those for float solutions are 2.1, 1.1, and 2.7 cm, corresponding to the improvements of 67, 45, and 22%, respectively. These results demonstrate that, currently, Galileo FCB can be estimated with accuracy comparable with GPS and BDS, and the Galileo observations can bring an obvious benefit to ambiguity-fixed PPP. Numéro de notice : A2019-057 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-018-0793-z Date de publication en ligne : 19/10/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0793-z Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92086
in GPS solutions > vol 23 n° 1 (January 2019)[article]