Centre de documentation
scientifique

Comparison of spatial modelling approaches to simulate urban growth: a case study on Udaipur city, India / Biswajit Mondal in Geocarto international, vol 35 n° 4 ([15/03/2020])  

Public [article]  inGeocarto international > vol 35 n° 4 [15/03/2020] . - pp 411 - 433 Titre : Comparison of spatial modelling approaches to simulate urban growth: a case study on Udaipur city, India Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Biswajit Mondal, Auteur ; Suman Chakraborti, Auteur ; Dipendra Nath Das, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 411 - 433 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Analyse spatiale [Termes IGN] analyse diachronique [Termes IGN] analyse multicritère [Termes IGN] automate cellulaire [Termes IGN] chaîne de Markov [Termes IGN] croissance urbaine [Termes IGN] étalement urbain [Termes IGN] Inde [Termes IGN] modèle de simulation [Termes IGN] modélisation spatiale [Termes IGN] pente [Termes IGN] Perceptron multicouche [Termes IGN] utilisation du sol Résumé : (auteur) Assessment of past and future urban growth processes helps the decision makers to evaluate and formulate the policy documents. In an attempt to make such assessments, this study compares three commonly used urban growth models: Multicriteria Cellular Automata-Markov Chain (MCCA-MC), Multi-Layer Perception Markov Chain (MLP-MC), and the Slope, Land use, Exclusion, Urban Extent, Transportation and Hillshade (SLEUTH). This study has taken into account the land use and land cover data for the years, 1977, 1992, 2000, 2008, 2016 and prepared driving variables for urban growth. The KAPPA index of agreement indicates that the MCCA-MC, MLP-MC and SLEUTH models avoid errors by 94%, 93%, and 92% respectively. Models forecast that about 156.96 km2, 157.43 km2 and 142.43 km2 built-up areas will emerge through the process of urbanization by 2031 in the city of Udaipur. However, this assessment identified that all the models are embodied with their own advantages and disadvantages while serving specific purposes. While the MCCA-MC and MLP-MC provides a good account of the urban spread, the SLEUTH identifies the new isolated growth centres more accurately. Numéro de notice : A2020-100 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/10106049.2018.1520922 Date de publication en ligne : 03/01/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1520922 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94691 [article]