Centre de documentation
scientifique

Performance tests of geodetic receivers with tilt sensors in obstructed environments using the NRTK GNSS technique / Puttipol Dumrongchai in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 17 n° 1 (January 2023)  

Public [article]  inJournal of applied geodesy > vol 17 n° 1 (January 2023) . - pp 39 - 51 Titre : Performance tests of geodetic receivers with tilt sensors in obstructed environments using the NRTK GNSS technique Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Puttipol Dumrongchai, Auteur ; Jittranud Patsadutarn, Auteur ; Chalermchon Satirapod, Auteur Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : pp 39 - 51 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications de géodésie spatiale [Termes IGN] centrale inertielle [Termes IGN] Continuously Operating Reference Station network [Termes IGN] délimitation [Termes IGN] lever cadastral [Termes IGN] microsystème électromécanique [Termes IGN] positionnement cinématique en temps réel [Termes IGN] récepteur GNSS [Termes IGN] signal GNSS [Termes IGN] station virtuelle de référence [Termes IGN] Thaïlande Résumé : (auteur) The Department of Lands (DOL), Thailand, has adopted the Network-based Real-Time Kinematic (NRTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) surveying technique using a Virtual Reference Station (VRS) to support cadastral surveys since 2011. Determining accurate coordinates of parcel boundary markers at building corners or near fences and walls is difficult because a GNSS range pole cannot be leveled with a circular bubble. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the receivers equipped with tilt sensors for horizontal and vertical positioning. Two types of tilt sensors used for evaluation were a magnetometer and micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Conducting the NRTK GNSS surveying tests was based on the pole tilt angles of 0°, 15°, 25°, 35°, and 45° from a plumb line in controlled and obstructed environments. The IMU-based tilt sensor had more advantage of accurately positioning over the MEMS sensor. The results showed that using the IMU, better than 4 cm horizontal positioning accuracy was achievable when the pole was tilted by 15° or less under non-multipath and open-sky conditions. The vertical accuracy was of a few centimeter levels and least sensitive to tilt angles using either type of sensor. However, none of the sensors precisely compensated for pole tilt in strong-multipath and complex environments, causing increased horizontal errors in decimeter levels. Numéro de notice : A2023-111 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1515/jag-2022-0047 Date de publication en ligne : 07/11/2022 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0047 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=102470 [article]