Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Thomas Křemen |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
UAV DTM acquisition in a forested area – comparison of low-cost photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) and LiDAR solutions (DJI Zenmuse L1) / Martin Štroner in European journal of remote sensing, vol 56 n° 1 (2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : UAV DTM acquisition in a forested area – comparison of low-cost photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) and LiDAR solutions (DJI Zenmuse L1) Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Martin Štroner, Auteur ; Rudolf Urban, Auteur ; Thomas Křemen, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2023 Article en page(s) : n° 2179942 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications photogrammétriques
[Termes IGN] densité de la végétation
[Termes IGN] données lidar
[Termes IGN] image captée par drone
[Termes IGN] modèle numérique de terrain
[Termes IGN] rugosité du sol
[Termes IGN] semis de points
[Termes IGN] structure-from-motionRésumé : (auteur) In this paper, we evaluated the results in terms of accuracy and coverage of the LiDAR-UAV system DJI Zenmuse L1 and Digital Aerial Photogrammetric system (DAP – UAV) DJI Zenmuse P1 in a forested area under leaf-off conditions on three sites with varying terrain ruggedness/tree type combinations. Detailed reference clouds were obtained using terrestrial scanning by Leica P40. Our results show that branches pose no problem to the accuracy of LiDAR-UAV and DAP-UAV derived terrain clouds. Elevation accuracies for photogrammetric data were even better than for LiDAR data – as low as 0.015 m on all sites. However, the LiDAR system provided better coverage, with almost full coverage at all sites, while the DAP-UAV coverage declined with the increasing density of branches (being worst in the young forest). In the very dense young forest (Site 1), the coverage by photogrammetrically extracted terrain cloud using high calculation quality and no filtering achieved 80.7% coverage, while LiDAR-UAV reached almost 100% coverage. The importance of the use of multiple (or last) returns when using LiDAR-UAV systems was demonstrated by the fact that on the site with the densest vegetation, only 11% of the ground points were represented by first returns. Numéro de notice : A2023-219 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942 Date de publication en ligne : 01/03/2023 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=103161
in European journal of remote sensing > vol 56 n° 1 (2023) . - n° 2179942[article]