Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Gyanesh Chander |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Assessment of spectral, misregistration, and spatial uncertainties inherent in the cross-calibration study / Gyanesh Chander in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 51 n° 3 Tome 1 (March 2013)
[article]
Titre : Assessment of spectral, misregistration, and spatial uncertainties inherent in the cross-calibration study Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gyanesh Chander, Auteur ; Dennis L. Helder, Auteur ; David Aaron, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : pp 1282 - 1296 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement d'image optique
[Termes IGN] bande spectrale
[Termes IGN] étalonnage relatif
[Termes IGN] image EO1-Hyperion
[Termes IGN] image hyperspectrale
[Termes IGN] image Landsat-ETM+
[Termes IGN] image Landsat-TM
[Termes IGN] image Terra-MODIS
[Termes IGN] incertitude de mesurage
[Termes IGN] incertitude géométrique
[Termes IGN] incertitude spectrale
[Termes IGN] Libye
[Termes IGN] pouvoir de résolution géométrique
[Termes IGN] réponse spectraleRésumé : (Auteur) Cross-calibration of satellite sensors permits the quantitative comparison of measurements obtained from different Earth Observing (EO) systems. Cross-calibration studies usually use simultaneous or near-simultaneous observations from several spaceborne sensors to develop band-by-band relationships through regression analysis. The investigation described in this paper focuses on evaluation of the uncertainties inherent in the cross-calibration process, including contributions due to different spectral responses, spectral resolution, spectral filter shift, geometric misregistrations, and spatial resolutions. The hyperspectral data from the Environmental Satellite SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CartograpHY and the EO-1 Hyperion, along with the relative spectral responses (RSRs) from the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (TM) Plus and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer sensors, were used for the spectral uncertainty study. The data from Landsat 5 TM over five representative land cover types (desert, rangeland, grassland, deciduous forest, and coniferous forest) were used for the geometric misregistrations and spatial-resolution study. The spectral resolution uncertainty was found to be within 0.25%, spectral filter shift within 2.5%, geometric misregistrations within 0.35%, and spatial-resolution effects within 0.1% for the Libya 4 site. The one-sigma uncertainties presented in this paper are uncorrelated, and therefore, the uncertainties can be summed orthogonally. Furthermore, an overall total uncertainty was developed. In general, the results suggested that the spectral uncertainty is more dominant compared to other uncertainties presented in this paper. Therefore, the effect of the sensor RSR differences needs to be quantified and compensated to avoid large uncertainties in cross-calibration results. Numéro de notice : A2013-124 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228008 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228008 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=32262
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 51 n° 3 Tome 1 (March 2013) . - pp 1282 - 1296[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 065-2013031A RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible Overview of Intercalibration / Gyanesh Chander in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 51 n° 3 Tome 1 (March 2013)
[article]
Titre : Overview of Intercalibration Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gyanesh Chander, Auteur ; Tim J. Hewison, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : pp 1056 - 1080 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Acquisition d'image(s) et de donnée(s)
[Termes IGN] capteur (télédétection)
[Termes IGN] cohérence des données
[Termes IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes IGN] étalonnage d'instrument
[Termes IGN] étalonnage en vol
[Termes IGN] étalonnage radiométrique
[Termes IGN] étalonnage relatif
[Termes IGN] état de l'artRésumé : (Auteur) Intercalibration of satellite instruments is critical for detection and quantification of changes in the Earth's environment, weather forecasting, understanding climate processes, and monitoring climate and land cover change. These applications use data from many satellites; for the data to be interoperable, the instruments must be cross-calibrated. To meet the stringent needs of such applications, instruments must provide reliable, accurate, and consistent measurements over time. Robust techniques are required to ensure that observations from different instruments can be normalized to a common scale that the community agrees on. The long-term reliability of this process needs to be sustained in accordance with established reference standards and best practices. Furthermore, establishing physical meaning to the information through robust Système International d'unités traceable calibration and validation (Cal/Val) is essential to fully understand the parameters under observation. The processes of calibration, correction, stability monitoring, and quality assurance need to be underpinned and evidenced by comparison with “peer instruments” and, ideally, highly calibrated in-orbit reference instruments. Intercalibration between instruments is a central pillar of the Cal/Val strategies of many national and international satellite remote sensing organizations. Intercalibration techniques as outlined in this paper not only provide a practical means of identifying and correcting relative biases in radiometric calibration between instruments but also enable potential data gaps between measurement records in a critical time series to be bridged. Use of a robust set of internationally agreed upon and coordinated intercalibration techniques will lead to significant improvement in the consistency between satellite instruments and facilitate accurate monitoring of the Earth's climate at uncertainty levels needed to detect and attribute the mechanisms of change. This paper summarizes the state-of-the-art of postlaunch radiometric calibration of remote sensing satellite instruments through intercalibration. Numéro de notice : A2013-121 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=32259
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 51 n° 3 Tome 1 (March 2013) . - pp 1056 - 1080[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 065-2013031A RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible A procedure for radiometric recalibration of Landsat 5 TM reflective-band data / Gyanesh Chander in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 48 n° 1 Tome 2 (January 2010)
[article]
Titre : A procedure for radiometric recalibration of Landsat 5 TM reflective-band data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gyanesh Chander, Auteur ; O. Haque, Auteur ; Esad Micijevic, Auteur ; A. Barsi, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : pp 556 - 574 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Acquisition d'image(s) et de donnée(s)
[Termes IGN] étalonnage des données
[Termes IGN] étalonnage radiométrique
[Termes IGN] image Landsat-TM
[Termes IGN] qualité des données
[Termes IGN] traitement différéRésumé : (Auteur) From the Landsat program's inception in 1972 to the present, the Earth science user community has been benefiting from a historical record of remotely sensed data. The multispectral data from the Landsat 5 (L5) Thematic Mapper (TM) sensor provide the backbone for this extensive archive. Historically, the radiometric calibration procedure for the L5 TM imagery used the detectors' response to the internal calibrator (IC) on a scene-by-scene basis to determine the gain and offset for each detector. The IC system degraded with time, causing radiometric calibration errors up to 20%. In May 2003, the L5 TM data processed and distributed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science Center through the National Landsat Archive Production System (NLAPS) were updated to use a lifetime lookup-table (LUT) gain model to radiometrically calibrate TM data instead of using scene-specific IC gains. Further modification of the gain model was performed in 2007. The L5 TM data processed using IC prior to the calibration update do not benefit from the recent calibration revisions. A procedure has been developed to give users the ability to recalibrate their existing level-1 products. The best recalibration results are obtained if the work-order report that was included in the original standard data product delivery is available. However, if users do not have the original work-order report, the IC trends can be used for recalibration. The IC trends were generated using the radiometric gain trends recorded in the NLAPS database. This paper provides the details of the recalibration procedure for the following: 1) data processed using IC where users have the work-order file; 2) data processed using IC where users do not have the work-order file; 3) data processed using prelaunch calibration parameters; and 4) data processed using the previous version of the LUT (e.g., LUT03) that was released before April 2, 2007. Copyright IEEE Numéro de notice : A2010-036 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2026166 Date de publication en ligne : 15/09/2009 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2026166 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=30232
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 48 n° 1 Tome 2 (January 2010) . - pp 556 - 574[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 065-2010011B RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible Landsat-5 TM reflective-band absolute radiometric calibration / Gyanesh Chander in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 42 n° 12 (December 2004)
[article]
Titre : Landsat-5 TM reflective-band absolute radiometric calibration Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gyanesh Chander, Auteur ; D.L. Helder, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2004 Article en page(s) : pp 2747 - 2760 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Acquisition d'image(s) et de donnée(s)
[Termes IGN] dégradation d'image
[Termes IGN] étalonnage radiométrique
[Termes IGN] réflectance spectrale
[Termes IGN] réponse spectrale
[Termes IGN] Thematic MapperRésumé : (Auteur) The Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) sensor provides the longest running continuous dataset of moderate spatial resolution remote sensing imagery, dating back to its launch in march 1984. Historically, the radiometric calibration procedure for this imagery used the instrument's response to the Internal Calibrator (IC) on a scene-by-scene basis to determine the gain and offset of each detector. Due to observed degradations in the IC, a new procedure was implemented for U.S.-processed data in May 2003. This new calibration procedure is based on a lifetime radiometric calibration model for the instrument's reflective bands (1-5 and 7) and is derived, in part, from the IC response without the related degradation effects and is tied to the cross calibration with the Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus. Reflective-band absolute radiometric accuracy of the instrument tends to be on the order of 7 % to 10 %, based on a variety of calibration methods. Numéro de notice : A2004-535 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2004.836388 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.836388 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27052
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 42 n° 12 (December 2004) . - pp 2747 - 2760[article]Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 065-04121 RAB Revue Centre de documentation En réserve L003 Disponible