Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Gilles Chaix
Commentaire :
CIRAD, BIOS Department - TA A-39, Genetic diversity and breeding of forest species unit research BP 5035, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesA novel method to correct for wood MOE ultrasonics and NIRS measurements on increment cores in Liquidambar styraciflua L / Herizo Rakotovololonalimanana in Annals of Forest Science [en ligne], vol 72 n° 6 (September 2015)
Titre : A novel method to correct for wood MOE ultrasonics and NIRS measurements on increment cores in Liquidambar styraciflua L Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Herizo Rakotovololonalimanana, Auteur ; Gilles Chaix, Auteur ; Loïc Brancheriau, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp 753 - 761 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications de télédétection
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] élasticité
[Termes IGN] image proche infrarouge
[Termes IGN] Liquidambar styraciflua
[Termes IGN] spectrométrie
[Termes IGN] télédétection acoustique
[Termes IGN] ultrasonRésumé : (auteur) Key message : Ultrasounds overestimate the MOE value. This paper analyses the causes of this difference and opens the perspective for a novel method allowing the calculation of the correct MOE from ultrasounds or NIRS measurements on cores.
Context : Standardized methods for determining wood modulus of elasticity (MOE) are destructive and require many replicates. Other methods such as NIRS and ultrasound have been developed to characterize wood properties and overcome these constraints.
Aim : The aim of this study was to compare the two MOE measurement methods (NIRS and ultrasound) applied to cores of wood taken from standing trees (Liquidambar styraciflua).
Methods : MOE, measured by an acoustic method in standard samples (360 × 20 × 20 mm), was used as a reference. Then MOE was predicted by an NIRS model and determined using ultrasound in standard samples (360 × 20 × 20 mm), small samples (10 × 20 × 20 mm), and cores (15 mm in diameter).
Result : MOE values determined by acoustic method on standard samples and by ultrasonic method on small samples were correlated (R 2 = 0.72) and were not statistically different. The NIRS PLS regression yielded a model with R 2 cv = 0.80. The link between NIRS and ultrasound on cores was statistically significant (R 2 = 0.68).
Conclusion : The ultrasonic technique determines an apparent modulus enables comparative data analysis. This apparent modulus can be used for quantitative analysis if a corrective model is used. A correction formula to ultrasonic MOE was proposed in the case of a prismatic geometry.Numéro de notice : A2015-409 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1007/s13595-015-0469-6 Date de publication en ligne : 12/03/2015 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-015-0469-6 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=76896
in Annals of Forest Science [en ligne] > vol 72 n° 6 (September 2015) . - pp 753 - 761[article]
