Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Anne Stenger
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Visionner les documents numériques Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
How does economic research contribute to the management of forest ecosystem services? / Serge Garcia in Annals of Forest Science [en ligne], vol 75 n° 2 (June 2018)
Titre : How does economic research contribute to the management of forest ecosystem services? Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Serge Garcia, Auteur ; Jens Abildtrup, Auteur ; Anne Stenger, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] aménagement forestier
[Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse économique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] changement climatique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] conservation des ressources naturelles
[Termes descripteurs IGN] écologie forestière
[Termes descripteurs IGN] forêt
[Termes descripteurs IGN] gestion forestière durable
[Termes descripteurs IGN] politique publique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] préservation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] service écosystémique
[Vedettes matières IGN] Economie forestière
Résumé : (Auteur) Key message: More and more environmental and resource economists are taking a particular interest in research on forest ecosystem services (FES), especially in a context of climate change. Spatial and temporal issues are crucial to economic analyses and for the design of conservation policies. Interdisciplinary research involving ecological and economic disciplines is a prerequisite for the more effective management of forest ecosystems.
Context: Economists define non-market ecosystem services (ES) as public or common goods due to their characteristics of non-rivalry in terms of consumption and/or non-excludability. Just because they do not have a price does not mean that ES have no economic value because their social benefits are undoubtedly considerable. These features, associated with the market demand for timber and a poor climate risk assessment, may lead to the under-provision of non-market forest ES and the over-harvesting of timber.
Aims: In this article, we review research questions that are central to the enhancement of FES provision. Beyond the economic modelling of the joint provision of FES, we focus on issues related to the design of public policies to guide forest management. The objective is to provide crucial insights concerning the importance of a spatial and sustainable provision of FES.
Results: First, we provide an economic interpretation of the FES concept and a review of economic models of forest management. Second, we explain how spatial and temporal dimensions of FES can have major implications on their supply and demand. Both dimensions explain why FESs have to be taken into account in production decisions and public policies (including the design of payment for environmental services (PESs)).
Conclusion: A better understanding of FES provision and public policies to be enhanced is not possible without accounting for spatial and temporal dimensions. This helps to analyse the impact of intervention on FES and the cost-effectiveness of economic instruments, implying a coordinated effort to bring together ecological and economic data and models.
Numéro de notice : A2018-324 Thématique : FORET Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7 date de publication en ligne : 02/05/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink :
in Annals of Forest Science [en ligne] > vol 75 n° 2 (June 2018)[article]Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy: A bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forest / Emeline Hily in Ecological economics, vol 119 (November 2015)
Titre : Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy: A bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forest Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Emeline Hily, Auteur ; Serge Garcia, Auteur ; Anne Stenger, Auteur ; Gengyang Tu, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp 197 - 208 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Végétation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] industrie forestière
[Termes descripteurs IGN] protection de la biodiversité
[Termes descripteurs IGN] service écosystémique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] site Natura 2000
Résumé : (auteur) In France, the implementation of the EU biodiversity conservation policy within the Natura 2000 network combines regulatory tools and voluntary contracting. In this article, we empirically assess the cost-effectiveness of Natura 2000 contracts in forest areas. We simultaneously estimate a cost function for biodiversity conservation and the production set of biodiversity output and timber, while controlling for conservation measures. We show strong substitutability between biodiversity conservation and timber production. Estimate results on the cost-elasticity of biodiversity conservation also suggest the possibility of more ecologically ambitious contracts with lower average costs. Results also show that public owners are able to bear higher opportunity costs than private owners. Our findings may help to formulate policy recommendations in terms of contracts' targeting, likely to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the incentive scheme. Numéro de notice : A2015-690 Thématique : FORET Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern En ligne : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915003444 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink :
in Ecological economics > vol 119 (November 2015) . - pp 197 - 208[article]Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services ? / Nicolas Robert in Forest policy and economics, vol 35 (October 2013)
Titre : Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services ? Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Nicolas Robert, Auteur ; Anne Stenger, Auteur Congrès : International Conference on the New Frontiers of Forest Economics (26 - 30 juin 2012; ETH, Zurich, Suisse), Commanditaire Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : pp 83 - 91 Note générale : Bibliographie
This work was partially funded by the project Forgeco cofunded by the French National Research Agency, project No. ANR-09-STRA-02-01, which aims to propose new tools for the sustainable management of forest ecosystems at the landscape scale. This work was partially done during the European Collaborative Project NEWFOREX (New Ways to Value and Market Forest Externalities, Project no. 243950), a Small or medium scale focused research project of the European Framework Programme 7 (FP7-KBBE 2009-3).
Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] service écosystémique
[Vedettes matières IGN] Economie forestière
Résumé : (Auteur) Profits from forest management generally originate from harvested wood products or hunting leases. Other joint services such as biodiversity protection or landscape beauty are rarely paid for and are insufficiently provided. Payment schemes are designed to reduce this undersupply. In this paper, we analyze how paying for the additional provision of some services might affect the production of joint services. Payments should at least compensate for the loss of revenue resulting from providing more services. These opportunity costs can be estimated using a production possibility frontier in which the maximum profit from currently marketed outputs is a function of the externalities. We show that payment for a single service can threaten other services if there are diseconomies of scope. If at least two services are considered, then payments can either be made independently for each of them (stacking) or simultaneously in a bundle. In the case of bundling, the minimum payment amount corresponds the total opportunity cost whatever the interactions between services. In the case of stacking, if there are diseconomies of scope and if the amount paid for increasing each service equals the individual opportunity cost, then the total payment would not compensate for the total cost. Some services might remain undersupplied. On the contrary, if there are economies of scope then the total stacked amount will be greater than the total opportunity cost. Hence, it is critical to analyze interactions between ecosystem services because they are likely to change the profitability or the opportunity costs related to increasing the production of the ecosystem services and so the schemes of payments. Numéro de notice : A2013-836 Thématique : FORET Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.012 date de publication en ligne : 19/07/2013 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.012 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink :
in Forest policy and economics > vol 35 (October 2013) . - pp 83 - 91[article]