Centre dedocumentation
scientifique

The effect of acquisition error and level of detail on the accuracy of spatial analyses / Filip Biljecki in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 45 n° 2 (March 2018)  

Public [article]  inCartography and Geographic Information Science > Vol 45 n° 2 (March 2018) . - pp 156 - 176 Titre : The effect of acquisition error and level of detail on the accuracy of spatial analyses Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Filip Biljecki, Auteur ; Gerard B.M. Heuvelink, Auteur ; Hugo Ledoux, Auteur ; Jantien E. Stoter, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : pp 156 - 176 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Analyse spatiale [Termes descripteurs IGN] CityGML [Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur de positionnement [Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle 3D de l'espace urbain [Termes descripteurs IGN] niveau de détail [Termes descripteurs IGN] précision des données [Termes descripteurs IGN] propagation d'erreur Résumé : (Auteur) There has been a great deal of research about errors in geographic information and how they affect spatial analyses. A typical GIS process introduces various types of errors at different stages, and such errors usually propagate into errors in the result of a spatial analysis. However, most studies consider only a single error type thus preventing the understanding of the interaction and relative contributions of different types of errors. We focus on the level of detail (LOD) and positional error, and perform a multiple error propagation analysis combining both types of error. We experiment with three spatial analyses (computing gross volume, envelope area, and solar irradiation of buildings) performed with procedurally generated 3D city models to decouple and demonstrate the magnitude of the two types of error, and to show how they individually and jointly propagate to the output of the employed spatial analysis. The most notable result is that in the considered spatial analyses the positional error has a much higher impact than the LOD. As a consequence, we suggest that it is pointless to acquire geoinformation of a fine LOD if the acquisition method is not accurate, and instead we advise focusing on the accuracy of the data. Numéro de notice : A2018-008 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1080/15230406.2017.1279986 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1279986 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=88977 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
032-2018021	SL	Revue	Centre de documentation	Revues en salle	Disponible

Level of detail in 3D city models / Filip Biljecki (2017)  

Public Titre : Level of detail in 3D city models Type de document : Thèse/HDR Auteurs : Filip Biljecki, Auteur ; Jantien E. Stoter, Auteur ; Hugo Ledoux, Auteur Editeur : Delft [Pays-Bas] : Delft University of Technology Année de publication : 2017 Note générale : bibliographie Doctoral dissertation, Delft university of technology Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées [Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse de sensibilité [Termes descripteurs IGN] bâtiment [Termes descripteurs IGN] CityGML [Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur en position [Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle 3D de l'espace urbain [Termes descripteurs IGN] niveau de détail [Termes descripteurs IGN] propagation d'erreur [Termes descripteurs IGN] SIG 3D [Termes descripteurs IGN] spécification Résumé : (auteur) The concept of level of detail (LOD) describes the content of 3D city models and it plays an essential role during their life cycle. On one hand it comes akin to the concepts of scale in cartography and LOD in computer graphics, on the other hand it is a standalone concept that requires attention. LOD has an influence on tendering and acquisition, and it has a hand in storage, maintenance, and application aspects. However, it has not been significantly researched, and this PhD thesis fills this void. This thesis reviews dozens of current LOD standards, revealing that most practitioners consider the LOD to be comprised solely of the geometric detail of data and there are disparate views on the concept as a whole. However, the research suggests that the LOD encompasses additional metrics, such as semantics and texture. The thesis formalises the concept, enabling integration and comparison of current LOD standards. The established framework may be applied to cartography and to different forms of 3D geoinformation such as point clouds. Following the formalised concept, a new LOD specification is presented improving the LOD concept in the current OGC CityGML 2.0 standard, a prominent norm in the 3D GIS industry. The specification introduces 16 LODs for buildings that are shaped after analysing the capabilities of acquisition techniques and a large number of real-world datasets. The improved LOD specification may be integrated in product portfolios and tenders, preventing misunderstandings between stakeholders, and as a better language for communicating the specifics of a dataset to be acquired. The specification also considers different approaches to realise the data. Such geometric references result in dozens of different variants of the same LOD.3D data according to the LOD specification was generated using a procedural modelling engine that was developed over the course of the research. The engine is capable of producing 3D city models in a large number of different variants and according to the CityGML standard. The thesis also catalogues the many different ways to create 3D city models. A prominent technique for producing data in a different LOD is generalisation, i.e. simplifying a 3D city model. The inverse---augmenting the LOD of a dataset---has not been researched to a great extent, and this thesis gives an overview of the topic. This research demonstrates that it is possible to generate 3D city models without elevation measurements, inherently augmenting the LOD of coarser data (2D footprints). The method relies on machine learning: several attributes found in 2D datasets may hint at the height of a building, thus enabling extrusion and creating 3D city models suited for several applications.Some acquisition techniques may result in multi-LOD datasets, and nowadays there are some regions represented in different, independent datasets. However, it was found that possibilities to link such data are deficient. The lack of linking mechanisms inhibits acquisition, storage, and maintenance of multi-LOD data. Two methods for linking features across two or more LODs have been developed resulting in an increased consistency of multi-LOD datasets. The first method links matching geometries across multiple LODs, while the second method establishes a 4D data structure in which the LOD is modelled as the fourth (spatial) dimension.It is often believed that the more detailed 3D data the better. However, similarly as in computer graphics, dealing with data at fine LODs comes at a cost: such datasets are harder to obtain, their storage footprint is large, and their usage within a spatial analysis may be slow. Scarce research has been dedicated to investigating whether an increase in the LOD of the data brings a comparably significant increase in benefits when the data is used in a spatial analysis.First, an analysis using real-world multi-LOD data was carried out. Different LODs of spatial data covering the Netherlands was used in a spatial analysis to refine population maps, obtaining different results for each LOD. However, several problems are exposed, revealing that using real data for such investigations is not optimal.The remainder of the research focuses on using procedurally generated data for such experiments. Synthetic data in several different LODs has been generated and employed for four spatial analyses (estimation of the building shadow, envelope area, volume, and solar irradiation). The experiments result in different conclusions. Finer LODs usually bring some improvement to the quality of the spatial analysis, but not always and such may be negligible. The results of the experiments ultimately depend on the spatial analysis that is considered. The varying results between different spatial analyses make each of them unique. Furthermore, the benefit a finer LOD brings to a spatial analysis is not always clear and easily measurable. In short, striving to produce data at finer LODs may please the eye, but this is not always counter-balanced in the benefit it brings to a spatial analysis.A further addition to the equation above is that when realised, 3D city models are unavoidably burdened with acquisition errors. An error propagation analysis was performed by disturbing the procedurally generated datasets with a range of simulated positional errors. Comparisons have been made between the intentionally degraded datasets and their error-free counterparts, thus obtaining the magnitude of uncertainty the positional errors cause in a spatial analysis. Based on these experiments, several findings are discovered, most importantly:1. How the LODs are realised (which geometric references are used) has a larger influence than the LOD. A coarse LOD produced with a favourable geometric reference may yield better results than a finer LOD realised with an unfavourable reference.2. Positional errors considerably affect spatial analyses. The effect is comparable across similar LODs. Simpler LODs are sligthly less affected by positional errors, but they may contain a large systematic error.3. Errors induced in the acquisition process generally cancel out the improvement provided by finer LODs. The main conclusion is that in the considered spatial analyses the positional error has a significantly higher impact than the LOD. As a consequence, it is suggested that it is pointless to acquire geoinformation at a fine LOD if the acquisition method is not accurate, and instead it is advised to focus on the improvement of accuracy of the data. The thesis proposes additional research for future work. For example, since this research focuses specifically on 3D building models, it would be worth extending the research to other urban features such as roads and vegetation. Furthermore, quality control in 3D GIS does not encompass the evaluation of the LOD of data. Hence integration of the LOD in quality standards should be a priority for future work. Note de contenu : 1- Introduction 2- Background 3- Formalisation of LOD 4- Designing an LOD specification for buildings 5- Variants of LODs 6- Realisation of the specification 7- Generating 3D city models without elevation data 8- Managing multi-LOD data 9- Influence of LOD on spatial analyses (I) 10- Influence of LOD on spatial analyses (II) 11- Sensitivity of LOD to positional errors 12- Combining LOD and positional errors 13- Conclusions and future prospects Numéro de notice : 17541 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Thèse étrangère Note de thèse : Doctoral dissertation : : Delft university of technology : 2017 DOI : 10.4233/uuid:f12931b7-5113-47ef-bfd4-688aae3be248 En ligne : https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Af12931b7-5113-47ef-bfd4-68 [...] Format de la ressource électronique : URL Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=91250

An improved LOD specification for 3D building models / Filip Biljecki in Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol 59 (September 2016)  

Public [article]  inComputers, Environment and Urban Systems > vol 59 (September 2016) . - pp 25 - 37 Titre : An improved LOD specification for 3D building models Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Filip Biljecki, Auteur ; Hugo Ledoux, Auteur ; Jantien E. Stoter, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 25 - 37 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Bases de données localisées [Termes descripteurs IGN] CityGML [Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle 3D de l'espace urbain [Termes descripteurs IGN] modélisation 3D du bâti BIM [Termes descripteurs IGN] niveau de détail [Termes descripteurs IGN] représentation multiple [Termes descripteurs IGN] SIG 3D Résumé : (auteur) The level of detail (LOD) concept of the OGC standard CityGML 2.0 is intended to differentiate multi-scale representations of semantic 3D city models. The concept is in practice principally used to indicate the geometric detail of a model, primarily of buildings. Despite the popularity and the general acceptance of this categorisation, we argue in this paper that from a geometric point of view the five LODs are insufficient and that their specification is ambiguous. We solve these shortcomings with a better definition of LODs and their refinement. Hereby we present a refined set of 16 LODs focused on the grade of the exterior geometry of buildings, which provide a stricter specification and allow less modelling freedom. This series is a result of an exhaustive research into currently available 3D city models, production workflows, and capabilities of acquisition techniques. Our specification also includes two hybrid models that reflect common acquisition practices. The new LODs are in line with the LODs of CityGML 2.0, and are intended to supplement, rather than replace the geometric part of the current specification. While in our paper we focus on the geometric aspect of the models, our specification is compatible with different levels of semantic granularity. Furthermore, the improved LODs can be considered format-agnostic. Among other benefits, the refined specification could be useful for companies for a better definition of their product portfolios, and for researchers to specify data requirements when presenting use cases of 3D city models. We support our refined LODs with experiments, proving their uniqueness by showing that each yields a different result in a 3D spatial operation. Numéro de notice : A2016-406 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.005 date de publication en ligne : 12/05/2016 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.005 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81230 [article]

A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals / Filip Biljecki in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 30 n° 7- 8 (July - August 2016)  

Public [article]  inInternational journal of geographical information science IJGIS > vol 30 n° 7- 8 (July - August 2016) . - pp 1302 - 1335 Titre : A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Filip Biljecki, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 1302 - 1335 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Documentation [Termes descripteurs IGN] bibliométrie [Termes descripteurs IGN] information géographique [Termes descripteurs IGN] périodique Résumé : (auteur) A set of 12,436 papers published in 20 GIScience journals in the period 2000–2014 were analysed to extract publication patterns and trends. This comprehensive scientometric study focuses on multiple aspects: output volume, citations, national output and efficiency (output adjusted with econometric indicators), collaboration, altmetrics (Altmetric score, Twitter mentions, and Mendeley bookmarking), authorship, and length. Examples of notable observations are that 5% countries account for 76% of global GIScience output; a paper published 15 years ago received a median of 12 citations; and the share of international collaborations in GIScience has more than tripled since 2000 (31% papers had authors from multiple countries in 2014, an increase from 10% in 2000). Numéro de notice : A2016-332 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE/SOCIETE NUMERIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/13658816.2016.1155214 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1155214 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80961 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (2)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
079-2016042	RAB	Revue	Centre de documentation	En réserve 3L	Disponible
079-2016041	RAB	Revue	Centre de documentation	En réserve 3L	Disponible

The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses / Filip Biljecki in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol 116 (June 2016)  

Public [article]  inISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing > vol 116 (June 2016) . - pp 42 – 54 Titre : The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Filip Biljecki, Auteur ; Hugo Ledoux, Auteur ; Jantien E. Stoter, Auteur ; M. George Vosselman, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 42 – 54 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications photogrammétriques [Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse spatiale [Termes descripteurs IGN] CityGML [Termes descripteurs IGN] cohérence géométrique [Termes descripteurs IGN] méthode de Monte-Carlo [Termes descripteurs IGN] niveau de détail [Termes descripteurs IGN] reconstruction 3D du bâti [Termes descripteurs IGN] SIG 3D Résumé : (auteur) The level of detail (LOD) of a 3D city model indicates the model’s grade and usability. However, there exist multiple valid variants of each LOD. As a consequence, the LOD concept is inconclusive as an instruction for the acquisition of 3D city models. For instance, the top surface of an LOD1 block model may be modelled at the eaves of a building or at its ridge height. Such variants, which we term geometric references, are often overlooked and are usually not documented in the metadata. Furthermore, the influence of a particular geometric reference on the performance of a spatial analysis is not known. In response to this research gap, we investigate a variety of LOD1 and LOD2 geometric references that are commonly employed, and perform numerical experiments to investigate their relative difference when used as input for different spatial analyses. We consider three use cases (estimation of the area of the building envelope, building volume, and shadows cast by buildings), and compute the deviations in a Monte Carlo simulation. The experiments, carried out with procedurally generated models, indicate that two 3D models representing the same building at the same LOD, but modelled according to different geometric references, may yield substantially different results when used in a spatial analysis. The outcome of our experiments also suggests that the geometric reference may have a bigger influence than the LOD, since an LOD1 with a specific geometric reference may yield a more accurate result than when using LOD2 models. Numéro de notice : A2016-577 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : GEOMATIQUE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.003 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=81709 [article]

Automatically enhancing CityGML LOD2 models with a corresponding indoor geometry / Roeland Boeters in International journal of geographical information science IJGIS, vol 29 n° 12 (December 2015)  

Permalink