Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Donald F. Argus |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (5)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesMultivariate analysis of GPS position time series of JPL second reprocessing campaign / AliReza Amiri-Simkooei in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 6 (June 2017)
Titre : Multivariate analysis of GPS position time series of JPL second reprocessing campaign Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : AliReza Amiri-Simkooei, Auteur ; T.H. Mohammadloo, Auteur ; Donald F. Argus, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 685 - 704 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes IGN] analyse multivariée
[Termes IGN] bruit blanc
[Termes IGN] bruit rose
[Termes IGN] campagne GPS
[Termes IGN] centre de phase
[Termes IGN] coordonnées GPS
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] terme de Chandler
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (Auteur) The second reprocessing of all GPS data gathered by the Analysis Centers of IGS was conducted in late 2013 using the latest models and methodologies. Improved models of antenna phase center variations and solar radiation pressure in JPL’s reanalysis are expected to significantly reduce errors. In an earlier work, JPL estimates of position time series, termed first reprocessing campaign, were examined in terms of their spatial and temporal correlation, power spectra, and draconitic signal. Similar analyses are applied to GPS time series at 89 and 66 sites of the second reanalysis with the time span of 7 and 21 years, respectively, to study possible improvements. Our results indicate that the spatial correlations are reduced on average by a factor of 1.25. While the white and flicker noise amplitudes for all components are reduced by 29–56 %, the random walk amplitude is enlarged. The white, flicker, and random walk noise amount to rate errors of, respectively, 0.01, 0.12, and 0.09 mm/yr in the horizontal and 0.04, 0.41 and 0.3 mm/yr in the vertical. Signals reported previously, such as those with periods of 13.63, 14.76, 5.5, and 351.4 / n for n=1,2,…,8 days, are identified in multivariate spectra of both data sets. The oscillation of the draconitic signal is reduced by factors of 1.87, 1.87, and 1.68 in the east, north and up components, respectively. Two other signals with Chandlerian period and a period of 380 days can also be detected. Numéro de notice : A2017-297 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-016-0991-9 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0991-9 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85328
in Journal of geodesy > vol 91 n° 6 (June 2017) . - pp 685 - 704[article]
Titre : DPOD2008, A DORIS-oriented terrestrial reference frame for precise orbit determination Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Pascal Willis Editeur : Berlin, Heidelberg, Vienne, New York, ... : Springer Année de publication : 2016 Collection : International Association of Geodesy Symposia, ISSN 0939-9585 num. 143 Conférence : IAG 2013, Scientific assembly, IAG 150 Years Postdam Allemagne Proceedings Springer Importance : pp 175 - 181 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] Jason
[Termes IGN] orbitographie
[Termes IGN] repère de référence
[Termes IGN] station de poursuiteRésumé : (auteur) While accuracy of tracking station coordinates is of key importance for Precise Orbit Determination (POD) for altimeter satellites, reliability and operationality are also of great concern. In particular, while recent ITRF realizations should be the most accurate at the time of their computation, they cannot be directly used by the POD groups for operational consideration for several reasons such as new stations appearing in the network or new discontinuities affecting station coordinates. For POD purposes, we computed a new DORIS terrestrial frame called DPOD2008 derived from ITRF2008 (as previously done by DPOD2005 with regards to ITRF2005). In a first step, we will present the method used to validate the past ITRF2008 using more recent DORIS data and to derive new station positions and velocities, when needed. In particular, discontinuities in DORIS station positions and/or velocities are discussed. To derive new DORIS station coordinates, we used recent DORIS weekly time series of coordinates, recent GPS relevant time series at co-located sites and also dedicated GPS campaigns performed by IGN when installing new DORIS beacons. DPOD2008 also contains additional metadata that are useful when processing DORIS data, for example, periods during which DORIS data should not be used or at least for which data should be downweighted. In several cases, a physical explanation can be found for such temporary antenna instability. We then demonstrate improvements seen when using different reference frames, such as the original ITRF2008 solution, for precise orbit determination of altimeter satellites TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-2 over selected periods spanning 1993–2013. Numéro de notice : C2013-052 Affiliation des auteurs : LASTIG LAREG+Ext (2012-mi2018) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Communication nature-HAL : ComAvecCL&ActesPubliésIntl DOI : 10.1007/1345_2015_125 Date de publication en ligne : 07/07/2015 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_125 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=78500
Titre : External evaluation of the Terrestrial Reference Frame: report of the task force of the IAG sub-commission 1.2 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Xavier Collilieux Editeur : Berlin, Heidelberg, Vienne, New York, ... : Springer Année de publication : 2014 Collection : International Association of Geodesy Symposia, ISSN 0939-9585 num. 139 Conférence : IAG 2011, General Assembly 28/06/2011 02/07/2011 Melbourne Australie Proceedings Springer Importance : pp 197 - 202 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference FrameRésumé : (auteur) Ideally, the origin of the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF) is defined as the center of mass of the whole Earth system, the time evolution of its orientation is such that no global net rotation of the whole Earth’s surface is possible and the TRF scale is specified through the adoption of some physical constants and time-scale. These parameters need to be accurately determined since their choice has an influence on many Earth’s science applications. The aim of the task force “External evaluation of the Terrestrial Reference Frame” is to review all the applications for which the TRF accuracy is of fundamental importance. As the TRF choice has an influence on the interpretation of the results in these specific applications, we investigate if some evaluation procedures could be established. We classified the methods that allow evaluation of the TRF using ground, geodetic data or models that have not been used in the TRF construction, based on their expected contributions. Some of these methods have been applied to the latest International Terrestrial Reference System realizations and the results are presented here. Although further analysis will be necessary to deliver a more precise error budget, our findings demonstrate that the most recent realizations of the ITRS are more accurate than the previous in terms of origin and scale rate definition. The current level of ITRF2008 accuracy is likely to be at the level of 0.5 mm/year along each origin component and better than 0.3 mm/year in the scale rate according to the most recent studies. Numéro de notice : C2011-026 Affiliation des auteurs : LASTIG LAREG+Ext (2012-mi2018) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Communication nature-HAL : ComAvecCL&ActesPubliésIntl DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_25 Date de publication en ligne : 06/10/2013 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_25 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=78509
Titre : DORIS and GPS monitoring of the Gavdos calibration site in Crete Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Pascal Willis Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : pp 1438 - 1447 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] analyse diachronique
[Termes IGN] correction troposphérique
[Termes IGN] Crète (île)
[Termes IGN] étalonnage des données
[Termes IGN] GAMIT
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] modèle météorologique
[Termes IGN] positionnement par DORIS
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes IGN] retard troposphérique zénithal
[Termes IGN] série temporelleRésumé : (auteur) Due to its specific geographical location as well as its geodetic equipment (DORIS, GNSS, microwave transponder and tide gauges), the Gavdos station in Crete, Greece is one of the very few sites around the world used for satellite altimetry calibration. To investigate the quality of the Gavdos geodetic coordinates and velocities, we analyzed and compared here DORIS and GPS-derived results obtained during several years of observations. The DORIS solution is the latest ignwd11 solution at IGN, expressed in ITRF2008, while the GPS solution was obtained using the GAMIT software package. Current results show that 1–2 mm/yr agreement can be obtained for 3-D velocity, showing a good agreement with current geophysical models. In particular, the agreement obtained for the vertical velocity is around 0.3–0.4 mm/yr, depending on the terrestrial reference frame. As a by-product of these geodetic GPS and DORIS results, Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTDs) estimations were also compared in 2010 between these two techniques, and compared to ECMWF values, showing a 6.6 mm agreement in dispersion without any significant difference between GPS and DORIS (with a 97.6% correlation), but with a 13–14 mm agreement in dispersion when comparing to ECMWF model (with only about 90% correlation for both techniques). These tropospheric delay estimations could also provide an external calibration of the tropospheric correction used for the geophysical data of satellite altimetry missions. Numéro de notice : A2013-798 Affiliation des auteurs : LASTIG LAREG+Ext (2012-mi2018) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2012.08.006 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.08.006 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80125
in Advances in space research > vol 51 n° 8 (April 2013) . - pp 1438 - 1447[article]
Titre : The angular velocities of the plates and the velocity of Earth's centre from space geodesy Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Donald F. Argus, Auteur ; Richard G. Gordon, Auteur ; Michael B. Heflin, Auteur ; Chopo Ma, Auteur ; Richard J. Eanes, Auteur ; Pascal Willis Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : pp 913 - 960 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications de géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] géocentre
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] tectonique des plaques
[Termes IGN] vitesse angulaireRésumé : (auteur) Using space geodetic observations from four techniques (GPS, VLBI, SLR and DORIS), we simultaneously estimate the angular velocities of 11 major plates and the velocity of Earth's centre. We call this set of relative plate angular velocities GEODVEL (for GEODesy VELocity).
Plate angular velocities depend on the estimate of the velocity of Earth's centre and on the assignment of sites to plates. Most geodetic estimates of the angular velocities of the plates are determined assuming that Earth's centre is fixed in an International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), and are therefore subject to errors in the estimate of the velocity of Earth's centre. In ITRF2005 and ITRF2000, Earth's centre is the centre of mass of Earth, oceans and atmosphere (CM); the velocity of CM is estimated by SLR observation of LAGEOS's orbit. Herein we define Earth's centre to be the centre of mass of solid Earth (CE); we determine the velocity of CE by assuming that the portions of plate interiors not near the late Pleistocene ice sheets move laterally as if they were part of a rigid spherical cap. The GEODVEL estimate of the velocity of CE is likely nearer the true velocity of CM than are the ITRF2005 and ITRF2000 estimates because (1) no phenomena can sustain a significant velocity between CM and CE, (2) the plates are indeed nearly rigid (aside from vertical motion) and (3) the velocity of CM differs between ITRF2005 and ITRF2000 by an unacceptably large speed of 1.8 mm yr−1. The velocity of Earth's centre in GEODVEL lies between that of ITRF2000 and that of ITRF2005, with the distance from ITRF2005 being about twice that from ITRF2000. Because the GEODVEL estimates of uncertainties in plate angular velocities account for uncertainty in the velocity of Earth's centre, they are more realistic than prior estimates of uncertainties.
GEODVEL differs significantly from all prior global sets of relative plate angular velocities determined from space geodesy. For example, the 95 per cent confidence limits for the angular velocities of GEODVEL exclude those of REVEL (Sella et al.) for 34 of the 36 plate pairs that can be formed between any two of the nine plates with the best-constrained motion. The median angular velocity vector difference between GEODVEL and REVEL is 0.028° Myr−1, which is up to 3.1 mm yr−1 on Earth's surface. GEODVEL differs the least from the geodetic angular velocities that Altamimi et al. determine from ITRF2005. GEODVEL's 95 per cent confidence limits exclude 11 of 36 angular velocities of Altamimi et al., and the median difference is 0.015° Myr−1.
GEODVEL differs significantly from nearly all relative plate angular velocities averaged over the past few million years, including those of NUVEL-1A. The difference of GEODVEL from updated 3.2 Myr angular velocities is statistically significant for all but two of 36 angular velocities with a median difference of 0.063° Myr−1. Across spreading centres, eight have slowed down while only two have sped up. We conclude that plate angular velocities over the past few decades differ significantly from the corresponding angular velocity averaged over the past 3.2 Myr.Numéro de notice : A2010-656 Affiliation des auteurs : LAREG+Ext (1991-2011) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04463.x Date de publication en ligne : 01/03/2010 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04463.x Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=91734
in Geophysical journal international > vol 180 n° 3 (March 2010) . - pp 913 - 960[article]Documents numériques
en open access
The angular velocities of the plates ... - pdf éditeurAdobe Acrobat PDF
