Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Mathias I. Disney |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur



Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning / Louise Terryn in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol 168 (October 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Tree species classification using structural features derived from terrestrial laser scanning Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Louise Terryn, Auteur ; Kim Calders, Auteur ; Mathias I. Disney, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 170 - 181 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Lasergrammétrie
[Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes descripteurs IGN] arbre (flore)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] classification barycentrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] classification par régression logistique multinomiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] classification par séparateurs à vaste marge
[Termes descripteurs IGN] composition d'un peuplement forestier
[Termes descripteurs IGN] couvert forestier
[Termes descripteurs IGN] diamètre à hauteur de poitrine
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données lidar
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données localisées 3D
[Termes descripteurs IGN] espèce végétale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] extraction de traits caractéristiques
[Termes descripteurs IGN] inventaire forestier (techniques et méthodes)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] ombre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] semis de pointsRésumé : (auteur) Fast and automated collection of forest data, such as species composition information, is required to support climate mitigation actions. Recently, there have been significant advances in the use of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) instruments, which facilitate the capture of detailed forest structure. However, for tree species recognition the structural information from TLS has mainly been used to complement spectral information. TLS-only classification studies have been limited in size and diversity of plot forest types. In this paper, we investigate the potential of TLS for tree species classification. We used quantitative structure models to determine 17 structural tree features. These features were computed for 758 trees of five tree species, including two understory species, of a 1.4 hectare mixed deciduous forest plot. Three classification methods were compared: k-nearest neighbours, multinomial logistic regression and support vector machine. We assessed the potential underlying causes for structural differences with principal component analysis. We obtained classification success rates of approximately 80%, however, with producer accuracies for three of the five species ranging from 0 to 60%. Low producer accuracies were the result of a high intra- and low inter-species variability. These effects were, respectively, caused by a high size-dependency of the structural features and a convergence of structural traits across species as a result of the individual tree position in the forest canopy and shade tolerance. Nevertheless, the producer accuracies could be improved through sensitivity vs. specificity trade-offs, with over 50% for all species being obtainable. The high intra -and low inter-species variability complicate the classification. Furthermore, the classification performance and best classification method greatly depend on its targeted application. In conclusion, this study proves the added value of TLS for tree species classification but also shows that TLS opens up potential for testing and further development of ecological theory. Numéro de notice : A2020-636 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.009 date de publication en ligne : 21/08/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.009 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96059
in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing > vol 168 (October 2020) . - pp 170 - 181[article]Réservation
Réserver ce documentExemplaires (3)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 081-2020101 SL Revue Centre de documentation Revues en salle Disponible 081-2020103 DEP-RECP Revue MATIS Dépôt en unité Exclu du prêt 081-2020102 DEP-RECF Revue Nancy Dépôt en unité Exclu du prêt Evaluation of the range accuracy and the radiometric calibration of multiple terrestrial laser scanning instruments for data interoperability / Kim Calders in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 55 n° 5 (May 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Evaluation of the range accuracy and the radiometric calibration of multiple terrestrial laser scanning instruments for data interoperability Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Kim Calders, Auteur ; Mathias I. Disney, Auteur ; John Armston, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 2716 - 2724 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Lasergrammétrie
[Termes descripteurs IGN] acquisition de données
[Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage radiométrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] évaluation des données
[Termes descripteurs IGN] interopérabilité sémantique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] précision métrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] réflectance
[Termes descripteurs IGN] télémètre laser terrestreRésumé : (Auteur) Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data provide 3-D measurements of vegetation structure and have the potential to support the calibration and validation of satellite and airborne sensors. The increasing range of different commercial and scientific TLS instruments holds challenges for data and instrument interoperability. Using data from various TLS sources will be critical to upscale study areas or compare data. In this paper, we provide a general framework to compare the interoperability of TLS instruments. We compare three TLS instruments that are the same make and model, the RIEGL VZ-400. We compare the range accuracy and evaluate the manufacturer's radiometric calibration for the uncalibrated return intensities. Our results show that the range accuracy between instruments is comparable and within the manufacturer's specifications. This means that the spatial XYZ data of different instruments can be combined into a single data set. Our findings demonstrate that radiometric calibration is instrument specific and needs to be carried out for each instrument individually before including reflectance information in TLS analysis. We show that the residuals between the calibrated reflectance panels and the apparent reflectance measured by the instrument are greatest for highest reflectance panels (residuals ranging from 0.058 to 0.312). Numéro de notice : A2017-468 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2652721 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=86391
in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing > vol 55 n° 5 (May 2017) . - pp 2716 - 2724[article]Is waveform worth it? A comparison of LiDAR approaches for vegetation and landscape characterization / Karen Anderson in Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, vol 2 n° 1 (February 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Is waveform worth it? A comparison of LiDAR approaches for vegetation and landscape characterization Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Karen Anderson, Auteur ; Steven Hancock, Auteur ; Mathias I. Disney, Auteur ; Kevin J. Gaston, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp 5 - 15 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Lasergrammétrie
[Termes descripteurs IGN] canopée
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données lidar
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données localisées 3D
[Termes descripteurs IGN] forêt
[Termes descripteurs IGN] forme d'onde
[Termes descripteurs IGN] sous-bois
[Termes descripteurs IGN] sous-étageRésumé : (auteur) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) systems are frequently used in ecological studies to measure vegetation canopy structure. Waveform LiDAR systems offer new capabilities for vegetation modelling by measuring the time-varying signal of the laser pulse as it illuminates different elements of the canopy, providing an opportunity to describe the 3D structure of vegetation canopies more fully. This article provides a comparison between waveform airborne laser scanning (ALS) data and discrete return ALS data, using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data as an independent validation. With reference to two urban landscape typologies, we demonstrate that discrete return ALS data provided more biased and less consistent measurements of woodland canopy height (in a 100% tree covered plot, height underestimation bias = 0.82 m; SD = 1.78 m) than waveform ALS data (height overestimation bias = 0.65 m; SD = 1.45 m). The same biases were found in suburban data (in a plot consisting of 100% hard targets e.g. roads and pavements), but discrete return ALS were more consistent here than waveform data (SD=0.57 m compared to waveform SD=0.76 m). Discrete return ALS data performed poorly in describing the canopy understorey, compared to waveform data. Our results also highlighted errors in discrete return ALS intensity, which were not present with waveform data. Waveform ALS data therefore offer an improved method for measuring the three-dimensional structure of vegetation systems, but carry a higher data processing cost. New toolkits for analysing waveform data will expedite future analysis and allow ecologists to exploit the information content of waveform LiDAR. Numéro de notice : A2016--166 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article DOI : 10.1002/rse2.8 En ligne : http://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.8 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=87172
in Remote sensing in ecology and conservation > vol 2 n° 1 (February 2016) . - pp 5 - 15[article]