Centre dedocumentation
scientifique

Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest / Luka Jurjević in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol 169 (November 2020)  

Public [article]  inISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing > vol 169 (November 2020) . - pp 227 - 241 Titre : Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Luka Jurjević, Auteur ; Xinlian Liang, Auteur ; Mateo Gašparović, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 227 - 241 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Applications photogrammétriques [Termes IGN] analyse comparative [Termes IGN] balayage laser [Termes IGN] corrélation [Termes IGN] données de terrain [Termes IGN] données lidar [Termes IGN] échantillonnage [Termes IGN] forêt de feuillus [Termes IGN] hauteur des arbres [Termes IGN] image captée par drone [Termes IGN] modèle numérique de terrain [Termes IGN] parcelle forestière [Termes IGN] photogrammétrie métrologique [Termes IGN] Quercus pedunculata [Termes IGN] semis de points Résumé : (auteur) Tree height is one of the most important tree attributes in forest inventory. However, using conventional field methods to measure tree height is a laborious and time-consuming process. Despite the great interest in the past to facilitate tree height measurements, new, upcoming solutions are not yet thoroughly investigated. In this study, we investigated the applicability of different close-range remote sensing options for tree height measurement in a complex lowland deciduous forest. Six sample plots in a pedunculate oak forest were measured in detail using conventional methods. Close-range remote sensing datasets used in this study represent solutions from low-cost sensors used for hand-held personal laser scanning (PLShh), unmanned–borne laser scanning (ULS) and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry (UAVimage). Each tree in the sample plots was interactively measured directly from the point cloud, and correspondence of the field- and remote sensing measured trees was verified using tree positions collected during fieldwork. Cross-comparisons of different datasets were performed to evaluate the performances of different data sources in the tree height estimation with respect to crown class, tree height and species. All remote sensing data sources correlated well, e.g. biases between remote sensing sources were around ± 1%. The field-measured tree height in general correlated well with remote sensing data sources. The uncertainties and bias of the field measurements were dependent on the tree height and crown class. Field measurements tended to underestimate codominant and intermediate trees at the approximately 1 m magnitude, whilst remote sensing data sources were robust to crown classes. Low-cost ULS used in this study, and very likely in general, may not have enough penetration capability when measuring low and mostly occluded trees, causing missed treetops. PLShh gave tree height estimates closer to the real tree height than those derived from conventional field measurements for trees above 21 m height. Numéro de notice : A2020-641 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : FORET/IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.09.014 Date de publication en ligne : 03/10/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.09.014 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96064 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (3)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
081-2020111	RAB	Revue	Centre de documentation	En réserve 3L	Disponible
081-2020113	DEP-RECP	Revue	LaSTIG	Dépôt en unité	Exclu du prêt
081-2020112	DEP-RECF	Revue	Nancy	Dépôt en unité	Exclu du prêt