[article] | Titre : |
Comparison of precise orbit determination methods of zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic of GRACE-A satellite using SHORDE software |
| Type de document : |
Article/Communication |
| Auteurs : |
Kai Li, Auteur ; Xuhua Zhou, Auteur ; Nannan Guo, Auteur ; et al., Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2017 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp 157 - 166 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliographie |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Descripteur : |
[Vedettes matières IGN] Technologies spatiales
[Termes IGN] coordonnées GPS
[Termes IGN] GRACE
[Termes IGN] mesurage de phase
[Termes IGN] orbite basse
[Termes IGN] orbitographie
|
| Résumé : |
(Auteur) Zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) are three methods to obtain the precise orbits of Low Earth Orbit satellites (LEOs) by using the on-board GPS observations. Comparing the differences between those methods have great significance to establish the mathematical model and is usefull for us to select a suitable method to determine the orbit of the satellite. Based on the zero-difference GPS carrier-phase measurements, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHAO) has improved the early version of SHORDE and then developed it as an integrated software system, which can perform the POD of LEOs by using the above three methods. In order to introduce the function of the software, we take the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) on-board GPS observations in January 2008 as example, then we compute the corresponding orbits of GRACE by using the SHORDE software. In order to evaluate the accuracy, we compare the orbits with the precise orbits provided by Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The results show that: (1) If we use the dynamic POD method, and the force models are used to represent the non-conservative forces, the average accuracy of the GRACE orbit is 2.40cm, 3.91cm, 2.34cm and 5.17cm in radial (R), along-track (T), cross-track (N) and 3D directions respectively; If we use the accelerometer observation instead of non-conservative perturbation model, the average accuracy of the orbit is 1.82cm, 2.51cm, 3.48cm and 4.68cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. The result shows that if we use accelerometer observation instead of the non-conservative perturbation model, the accuracy of orbit is better. (2) When we use the reduced-dynamic POD method to get the orbits, the average accuracy of the orbit is 0.80cm, 1.36cm, 2.38cm and 2.87cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. This method is carried out by setting up the pseudo-stochastic pulses to absorb the errors of atmospheric drag and other perturbations. (3) If we use the kinematic POD method, the accuracy of the GRACE orbit is 2.92cm, 2.48cm, 2.76cm and 4.75cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. In conclusion, it can be seen that the POD of GRACE satellite is practicable by using different strategies and methods. The orbit solution is well and stable, they all can obtain the GRACE orbits with centimeter-level precision. |
| Numéro de notice : |
A2017-570 |
| Affiliation des auteurs : |
non IGN |
| Thématique : |
POSITIONNEMENT |
| Nature : |
Article |
| DOI : |
10.1515/jag-2017-0004 |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0004 |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
URL article |
| Permalink : |
https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=86690 |
in Journal of applied geodesy > vol 11 n° 3 (September 2017) . - pp 157 - 166
[article]
|
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesPléiades Neo, 4 satellites réactifs in Géomètre, n° 2191 (mai 2021)
L'espace des possibles (2015)
L'Europe spatiale (2014)
