Descripteur


Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
High-resolution geoid modeling using least squares modification of Stokes and Hotine formulas in Colorado / Mustafa Serkan Işık in Journal of geodesy, vol 95 n° 5 (May 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : High-resolution geoid modeling using least squares modification of Stokes and Hotine formulas in Colorado Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Mustafa Serkan Işık, Auteur ; Bihter Erol, Auteur ; Serdar Erol, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : n° 49 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Colorado (Etats-Unis)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] correction
[Termes descripteurs IGN] géoïde local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] intégrale de Stokes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] levé gravimétrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] matrice de covariance
[Termes descripteurs IGN] méthode des moindres carrés
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle mathématique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] montagne
[Termes descripteurs IGN] nivellement
[Termes descripteurs IGN] système de référence altimétriqueRésumé : (auteur) The Colorado geoid experiment was initiated and organized as a joint study by the Joint Working Group (JWG) 2.2.2 (1-cm geoid experiment) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) in 2017, and different institutions and research groups contributed to this study. The aim of this experiment was to clarify the repeatability of gravity potential values as International Height Reference System (IHRS) coordinates from different geoid determination approaches carried out with the same input dataset. The dataset included the terrestrial and airborne gravity observations, a digital terrain model, the XGM2016 global geopotential model and GPS/leveling data for model validations belonging to a mountainous area of approximately 550 km × 730 km in Colorado, US. The dataset was provided by National Geodetic Survey (NGS) department. In this frame, this article aims providing a discussion on Colorado geoid modeling through individual experimental results obtained by Istanbul Technical University-Gravity Research Group (ITU-GRG). This contribution mainly focused on modeling the Colorado geoid using the least squares modifications of Stokes and Hotine integral formulas with additive corrections. The computations using each formula were carried out using ITU-GRG software, including the solution variants based on terrestrial-only, airborne-only and combined gravity datasets. Then, the calculated experimental geoid models were validated using historical and recently measured profile-based GPS/leveling datasets, and they were also compared with the official solutions submitted by different institutions for the “1-cm geoid experiment” of IAG JWG 2.2.2. For all validation results, the Hotine and Stokes integral formulas yielded similar performances in terms of geoid accuracy; however, the models computed using the combined data had better accuracy than those using the terrestrial-only and airborne-only solutions. The geoid model solutions using the combined data had an accuracy of 2.69 cm for the Hotine method and 2.87 cm for the Stokes method in the test results using GPS/leveling data of the GSVS17 (Geoid Slope Validation Survey 2017) profile. Airborne data from the Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) project contributed significantly towards improving the geoid model, especially in the mountainous parts of the area. Numéro de notice : A2021-311 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : MATHEMATIQUE/POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-021-01501-z date de publication en ligne : 07/04/2021 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01501-z Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97503
in Journal of geodesy > vol 95 n° 5 (May 2021) . - n° 49[article]Strategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) / Laura Sánchez in Journal of geodesy, vol 95 n° 4 (April 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Strategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Laura Sánchez, Auteur ; Jonas Ågren, Auteur ; Jianliang Huang, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : n° 33 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Association internationale de géodésie
[Termes descripteurs IGN] champ de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] cohérence
[Termes descripteurs IGN] coordonnées géodésiques
[Termes descripteurs IGN] hauteur ellipsoïdale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] norme
[Termes descripteurs IGN] potentiel de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] système de référence altimétrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] système international de référence altimétriqueRésumé : (auteur) In 2015, the International Association of Geodesy defined the International Height Reference System (IHRS) as the conventional gravity field-related global height system. The IHRS is a geopotential reference system co-rotating with the Earth. Coordinates of points or objects close to or on the Earth’s surface are given by geopotential numbers C(P) referring to an equipotential surface defined by the conventional value W0 = 62,636,853.4 m2 s−2, and geocentric Cartesian coordinates X referring to the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS). Current efforts concentrate on an accurate, consistent, and well-defined realisation of the IHRS to provide an international standard for the precise determination of physical coordinates worldwide. Accordingly, this study focuses on the strategy for the realisation of the IHRS; i.e. the establishment of the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF). Four main aspects are considered: (1) methods for the determination of IHRF physical coordinates; (2) standards and conventions needed to ensure consistency between the definition and the realisation of the reference system; (3) criteria for the IHRF reference network design and station selection; and (4) operational infrastructure to guarantee a reliable and long-term sustainability of the IHRF. A highlight of this work is the evaluation of different approaches for the determination and accuracy assessment of IHRF coordinates based on the existing resources, namely (1) global gravity models of high resolution, (2) precise regional gravity field modelling, and (3) vertical datum unification of the local height systems into the IHRF. After a detailed discussion of the advantages, current limitations, and possibilities of improvement in the coordinate determination using these options, we define a strategy for the establishment of the IHRF including data requirements, a set of minimum standards/conventions for the determination of potential coordinates, a first IHRF reference network configuration, and a proposal to create a component of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS) dedicated to the maintenance and servicing of the IHRS/IHRF. Numéro de notice : A2021-260 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 date de publication en ligne : 22/02/2021 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97300
in Journal of geodesy > vol 95 n° 4 (April 2021) . - n° 33[article]A hybrid approach for recovering high-resolution temporal gravity fields from satellite laser ranging / Anno Löcher in Journal of geodesy, vol 95 n° 1 (January 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A hybrid approach for recovering high-resolution temporal gravity fields from satellite laser ranging Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Anno Löcher, Auteur ; Jürgen Kusche, Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : n° 6 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] champ de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] changement temporel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GRACE
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données TLS (télémétrie)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] facteur d'échelle
[Termes descripteurs IGN] fonction orthogonale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] harmonique sphérique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modélisation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] série temporelleRésumé : (auteur) A new approach to recover time-variable gravity fields from satellite laser ranging (SLR) is presented. It takes up the concept of lumped coefficients by representing the temporal changes of the Earth’s gravity field by spatial patterns via combinations of spherical harmonics. These patterns are derived from the GRACE mission by decomposing the series of monthly gravity field solutions into empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs). The basic idea of the approach is then to use the leading EOFs as base functions in the gravity field modelling and to adjust the respective scaling factors straightforward within the dynamic orbit computation; only for the lowest degrees, the spherical harmonic coefficients are estimated separately. As a result, the estimated gravity fields have formally the same spatial resolution as GRACE. It is shown that, within the GRACE time frame, both the secular and the seasonal signals in the GRACE time series are reproduced with high accuracy. In the period prior to GRACE, the SLR solutions are in good agreement with other techniques and models and confirm, for instance, that the Greenland ice sheet was stable until the late 1990s. Further validation is done with the first monthly fields from GRACE Follow-On, showing a similar agreement as with GRACE itself. Significant differences to the reference data only emerge occasionally when zooming into smaller river basins with strong interannual mass variations. In such cases, the approach reaches its limits which are set by the low spectral sensitivity of the SLR satellites and the strong constraints exerted by the EOFs. The benefit achieved by the enhanced spatial resolution has to be seen, therefore, primarily in the proper capturing of the mass signal in medium or large areas rather than in the opportunity to focus on isolated spatial details. Numéro de notice : A2021-026 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : MATHEMATIQUE/POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01460-x date de publication en ligne : 23/12/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01460-x Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96710
in Journal of geodesy > vol 95 n° 1 (January 2021) . - n° 6[article]The influence of sea-level changes on geodetic datums along the east coast of China / Yang Liu in Marine geodesy, vol 44 n° 1 (January 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The influence of sea-level changes on geodetic datums along the east coast of China Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Yang Liu, Auteur ; Chuanyin Zhang, Auteur ; Baogui Ke, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : pp 26 - 41 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse harmonique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] champ de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] changement du niveau de la mer
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Chine
[Termes descripteurs IGN] déformation de la croute terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données géodésiques
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données spatiotemporelles
[Termes descripteurs IGN] fonction de Green
[Termes descripteurs IGN] littoral
[Termes descripteurs IGN] surveillance du littoral
[Termes descripteurs IGN] système de référence localRésumé : (Auteur) Non-tidal variation on sea level generates immediate changes in gravity field and deformation of the Earth’s crust, thus influencing the stability of geodetic datums. To achieve higher accuracy of geodetic datums in coastal and island areas, sea-level changes should be adequately considered when conducting the maintenance of datums. Based on the data of sea-level anomalies from 2014 to 2017 and the theory of load-deformation of elastic spherical earth, this paper demonstrates that impacts of non-tidal ocean load can be quantitatively calculated on geodetic datums along the east coast of China, by using removerestore technique and combining spherical harmonic analysis of gravity field and Green’s functions to calculate loads. Temporal and spatial analyses on the impacts are conducted with Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) sites along the coast and on the islands. This paper has drawn some conclusions as follows: (1) The impact of non-tidal ocean loads on the east coastal geoid ranges from ?4.16 to 4.17mm, that on ground gravity ranges from ?15.44 to 17.02 some conclusions as follows: (1) The impact oranges from ?7.55 to 6.69mm. (2) The impacts are dominated by annual and semi-annual cycles. (3) The impacts appear to be more prominent in coastal areas and on islands than in inland areas. Numéro de notice : A2021-058 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/01490419.2020.1835757 date de publication en ligne : 06/11/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2020.1835757 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96847
in Marine geodesy > vol 44 n° 1 (January 2021) . - pp 26 - 41[article]Possibility to determine highly precise geoid for Egypt territory / Moamen Awad Habib Gad in Geodetski vestnik, vol 64 n° 4 (December 2020 - February 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Possibility to determine highly precise geoid for Egypt territory Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Moamen Awad Habib Gad, Auteur ; Oleg Odalovic, Auteur ; Sofija Naod, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 578-593 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] champ de pesanteur terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] collocation par moindres carrés
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Egypte
[Termes descripteurs IGN] géoïde local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] point d'appui
[Termes descripteurs IGN] précision centimétriqueRésumé : (Auteur) This paper presents an attempt to consider whether it is possible to determine a geoid at the centimetre level in the territory of Egypt based on recently available global and local gravity field data. The paper has two main objectives. Firstly, the paper overviews previously published geoid solutions, while the second objective investigates the performance of the recent global geopotential models (GGM) in Egypt. The existing geoid solutions have illustrated that there is an insufficient distribution of data which is sampled inconsistently. At this time, data deficiency still exists, and to overcome it, we have selected a "data window" and applied the Least Square Collocation (LSC) technique. The outcome from LSC was interesting and acceptable, and we obtained a "sample" geoid that has a standard deviation of 11 cm for the external control points. Numéro de notice : A2020-779 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2020.04.578-593 En ligne : http://www.geodetski-vestnik.com/en/2020-4 Format de la ressource électronique : URL bulletin Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96715
in Geodetski vestnik > vol 64 n° 4 (December 2020 - February 2021) . - pp 578-593[article]Réservation
Réserver ce documentExemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 139-2020041 SL Revue Centre de documentation Revues en salle Disponible Optimizing local geoid undulation model using GPS/levelling measurements and heuristic regression approaches / Mosbeh R. Kaloop in Survey review, vol 52 n° 375 (November 2020)
PermalinkFrom space to lithosphere: inversion of the GOCE gravity gradients. Supply to the Earth’s interior study / Matthieu Plasman in Geophysical journal international, vol 223 n° 1 (October 2020)
PermalinkSpheroidal spline interpolation and its application in geodesy / Mostafa Kiani in Geodesy and cartography, vol 46 n° 3 (October 2020)
PermalinkGRACE-FO precise orbit determination and gravity recovery / Z. Kang in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 9 (September 2020)
PermalinkUsing quantum optical sensors for determining the Earth’s gravity field from space / Jurgen Müller in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 8 (August 2020)
PermalinkA line integral approach for the computation of the potential harmonic coefficients of a constant density polyhedron / Olivier Jamet in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkUsing real polar ground gravimetry data to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery / Biao Lu in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
PermalinkValidation of marine geoid models by utilizing hydrodynamic model and shipborne GNSS profiles / Sander Varbla in Marine geodesy, Vol 43 n° 2 (March 2020)
PermalinkApplying iterative method to solving high-order terms of seafloor topography / Diao Fan in Marine geodesy, Vol 43 n° 1 (January 2020)
PermalinkAssessment of ArcGIS based extraction of geoidal undulation compared to National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) model – A case study / Sher Muhammad in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 14 n° 1 (January 2020)
PermalinkEtablissement d’une mesure gravimétrique absolue et d’un gradient vertical d’accélération de pesanteur dans les locaux du Laboratoire national d’essais (LNE) à Paris 15ème / Renaud Degoy (2020)
PermalinkPrecise local quasigeoid modelling using GNSS/levelling height anomalies and gravity data / Marek Trojanowicz in Survey review, Vol 52 n°370 (January 2020)
PermalinkA global vertical datum defined by the conventional geoid potential and the Earth ellipsoid parameters / Hadi Amin in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n°10 (October 2019)
PermalinkCombination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level / Ulrich Meyer in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 9 (September 2019)
PermalinkEvaluation of global geopotential models: a case study for India / Ropesh Goyal in Survey review, vol 51 n° 368 (September 2019)
PermalinkThe Iranian height datum offset from the GBVP solution and spirit-leveling/gravimetry data / Amir Ebadi in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 8 (August 2019)
PermalinkError propagation for the Molodensky G1 term / Jack C. McCubbine in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n°6 (June 2019)
PermalinkDeflections of the vertical from full-tensor and single-instrument gravity gradiometry / Christopher Jekeli in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 3 (March 2019)
PermalinkFFT swept filtering: a bias-free method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters / Petr Křen in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 2 (February 2019)
PermalinkA new global grid model for the determination of atmospheric weighted mean temperature in GPS precipitable water vapor / Liangke Huang in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 2 (February 2019)
PermalinkEvaluation of terrestrial and airborne gravity data over Antarctica : a generic approach / Philipp Zingerle in Journal of geodetic science, vol 9 n° 1 (January 2019)
PermalinkMass variation observing system by high low inter-satellite links (MOBILE) : a new concept for sustained observation of mass transport from space / Roland Pail in Journal of geodetic science, vol 9 n° 1 (January 2019)
PermalinkPermalinkReconciling upper mantle seismic velocity and density structure below ocean basins / Isabelle Panet (2019)
PermalinkPermalinkAn analysis of gravitational gradients in rotated frames and their relation to oriented mass sources / Isabelle Panet in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth, vol 123 n° 12 (December 2018)
PermalinkAUSGeoid2020 combined gravimetric–geometric model : location-specific uncertainties and baseline-length-dependent error decorrelation / Nicholas J. Brown in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 12 (December 2018)
PermalinkA Terrestrial Reference Frame realised on the observation level using a GPS-LEO satellite constellation / Daniel Koenig in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 11 (November 2018)
PermalinkLeast-squares cross-wavelet analysis and its applications in geophysical time series / Ebrahim Ghaderpour in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 10 (October 2018)
PermalinkA quelles altitudes se trouvent les horloges atomiques de l'observatoire de Paris ? / Xavier Collilieux in XYZ, n° 156 (septembre - novembre 2018)
PermalinkThe New Zealand gravimetric quasigeoid model 2017 that incorporates nationwide airborne gravimetry / Jack C. McCubbine in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 8 (August 2018)
PermalinkMigrating pattern of deformation prior to the Tohoku-Oki earthquake revealed by GRACE data / Isabelle Panet in Nature geoscience, vol 11 n° 5 (May 2018)
PermalinkUsing radial basis functions in airborne gravimetry for local geoid improvement / Xiaopeng Li in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 5 (May 2018)
PermalinkA methodology for least-squares local quasi-geoid modelling using a noisy satellite-only gravity field model / R. Klees in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 4 (April 2018)
PermalinkToward a global horizontal and vertical elastic load deformation model derived from GRACE and GNSS station position time series / Kristel Chanard in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth, vol 123 n° 4 (April 2018)
PermalinkKriging and moving window kriging on a sphere in geometric (GNSS/levelling) geoid modelling / M. Ligas in Survey review, vol 50 n° 359 (March 2018)
PermalinkRegional geoid computation by least squares modified Hotine’s formula with additive corrections / Silja Märdla in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 3 (March 2018)
PermalinkHigh performance clocks and gravity field determination / Jurgen Müller in Space Science Reviews, vol 214 n° 1 (February 2018)
PermalinkApplying the GOCE-based GGMs for the quasi-geoid modelling of Finland / Timo Saari in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 12 n° 1 (January 2018)
PermalinkAssessing the quality of GEOID12B model through field surveys / Ahmed F. Elaksher in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 12 n° 1 (January 2018)
PermalinkPermalinkDétermination d’un modèle géopotentiel à haute résolution en zone littorale aidé par des mesures d’horloges atomiques / Hugo Lecomte (2018)
PermalinkPermalinkHeight biases of SRTM DEM related to EGM96: from a global perspective to regional practice / A. Üstün in Survey review, vol 50 n° 358 (January 2018)
PermalinkNumerical solution to the oblique derivative boundary value problem on non-uniform grids above the Earth topography / Matej Medl’a in Journal of geodesy, vol 92 n° 1 (January 2018)
PermalinkA numerical test of the topographic bias / Lars E. Sjöberg in Journal of geodetic science, vol 8 n° 1 (January 2018)
PermalinkMICROSCOPE mission: First results of a space test of the equivalence principle / Pierre Touboul in Physical Review Letters, vol 119 n° 3 (December 2017)
PermalinkOn the estimation of physical height changes using GRACE satellite mission data – A case study of Central Europe / Walyeldeen Godah in Geodesy and cartography, vol 66 n° 2 (December 2017)
PermalinkExperiences with the QDaedalus system for astrogeodetic determination of deflections of the vertical / Markus Hauk in Survey review, vol 49 n° 355 (October 2017)
PermalinkThe relation between degree-2160 spectral models of Earth’s gravitational and topographic potential : a guide on global correlation measures and their dependency on approximation effects / Christian Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 10 (October 2017)
PermalinkTotalStation/GNSS/EGM integrated geocentric positioning method / Edward Osada in Survey review, vol 49 n° 354 (September 2017)
PermalinkDetermination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons / Guillaume Lion in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 6 (June 2017)
![]()
PermalinkInverting Glacial Isostatic Adjustment signal using Bayesian framework and two linearly relaxing rheologies / Lambert Caron in Geophysical journal international, vol 209 n° 2 (May 2017)
PermalinkMulti-scale modeling of Earth's gravity field in space and time / Shuo Wang in Journal of geodynamics, vol 106 (May 2017)
PermalinkSpace-wise approach for airborne gravity data modelling / Daniele Sampietro in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 5 (May 2017)
PermalinkLe chemin vers un système de référence altimétrique global et unifié / Laura Sánchez in XYZ, n° 150 (mars - mai 2017)
PermalinkGRACE era variability in the Earth's oblateness: a comparison of estimates from six different sources / Thierry Meyrath in Geophysical journal international, vol 208 n° 2 (February 2017)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkIs the Jason-2 DORIS oscillator also affected by the South Atlantic Anomaly? / Pascal Willis in Advances in space research, vol 58 n° 12 (15 December 2016)
PermalinkEffects of space weather on GOCE electrostatic gravity gradiometer measurements / Elmas Sinem Ince in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 12 (December 2016)
PermalinkOn the spectral combination of satellite gravity model, terrestrial and airborne gravity data for local gravimetric geoid computation / Tao Jian in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 12 (December 2016)
PermalinkOn the usefulness of relativistic space-times for the description of the Earth’s gravitational field / Michael Soffel in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 12 (December 2016)
PermalinkProblems and methods of calculating the Legendre functions of arbitrary degree and order / Elena Novikova in Geodesy and cartography, vol 65 n° 2 (December 2016)
PermalinkEvidence for postglacial signatures in gravity gradients: A clue in lower mantle viscosity / Laurent Métivier in Earth and planetary science letters, vol 452 (October 2016)
PermalinkA conventional value for the geoid reference potential W0 / L. Sánchez in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 9 (September 2016)
PermalinkTopographic gravitational potential up to second-order derivatives: an examination of approximation errors caused by rock-equivalent topography (RET) / Michael Kuhns in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 9 (September 2016)
PermalinkFast computation of general forward gravitation problems / Fabien Casenave in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 7 (July 2016)
PermalinkUtilization of high-resolution EGM2008 gravity data for geological exploration over the Singhbhum-Orissa Craton, India / S.K. Pal in Geocarto international, vol 31 n° 7 - 8 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkOn the impact of airborne gravity data to fused gravity field models / Dimitrios Bolkas in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 6 (June 2016)
PermalinkJoint analysis of GOCE gravity gradients data of gravitational potential and of gravity with seismological and geodynamic observations to infer mantle properties / Marianne Greff-Lefftz in Geophysical journal international, vol 205 n° 1 (April 2016)
PermalinkComparison of Satellite-Only Gravity Field Models Constructed with All and Parts of the GOCE Gravity Gradient Dataset / Sean L. Bruinsma in Marine geodesy, vol 39 n° 3-4 (March - June 2016)
PermalinkContribution of mass density heterogeneities to the quasigeoid-to-geoid separation / Robert Tenzer in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 1 (January 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkExploring mass variations in the Earth system / Mike Sips in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 43 n° 1 (January 2016)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkObserved changes in the Earth’s dynamic oblateness from GRACE data and geophysical models / Y. Sun in Journal of geodesy, vol 90 n° 1 (January 2016)
PermalinkError analysis of a new planar electrostatic gravity gradiometer for airborne surveys / Karim Douch in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 12 (december 2015)
PermalinkGravity field modelling and gravimetry / Jan Krynski in Geodesy and cartography, vol 64 n° 2 (December 2015)
PermalinkA surface spherical harmonic expansion of gravity anomalies on the ellipsoid / S.J. Claessens in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 10 (october 2015)
PermalinkTime variable Earth’s gravity field from SLR satellites / Krzysztof Sosnica in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 10 (october 2015)
PermalinkGravimetric and magnetic anomalies produced by dissolution-crystallization at the core-mantle boundary / Mioara Mandea in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth, vol 120 n° 9 (September 2015)
![]()
PermalinkReducing leakage error in GRACE-observed long-term ice mass change: a case study in West Antarctica / J. L. Chen in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 9 (september 2015)
PermalinkSketchUp as a construction tool for large-scale subsurface structures: three-dimensional visualization of the Parry Sound Domain, Grenville Province, Ontario / Jacob W.D. Strong in Cartographica, vol 50 n° 3 (Fall 2015)
PermalinkAlternative validation method of satellite gradiometric data by integral transform of satellite altimetry data / Michal Šprlák in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 8 (August 2015)
PermalinkAccuracy of unmodified Stokes’ integration in the R-C-R procedure for geoid computation / Zahra Ismaïl in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 9 n° 2 (June 2015)
PermalinkAnalysis of star camera errors in GRACE data and their impact on monthly gravity field models / Pedro Inácio in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 6 (June 2015)
PermalinkSeparation of atmospheric, oceanic and hydrological polar motion excitation mechanisms based on a combination of geometric and gravimetric space observations / F. Göttl in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 4 (April 2015)
PermalinkGeological mapping of Jharia Coalfield, India using GRACE EGM2008 gravity data : a vertical derivative approach / Jitendra Vaish in Geocarto international, vol 30 n° 3 - 4 (March - April 2015)
PermalinkAssimilation of GRACE-derived oceanic mass distributions with a global ocean circulation model / J. Saynisch in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 2 (February 2015)
PermalinkConsistent estimates of the dynamic figure parameters of the Earth / Wei Chen in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 2 (February 2015)
PermalinkGravity field processing with enhanced numerical precision for LL-SST missions / Ilias Daras in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 2 (February 2015)
PermalinkDetermination of precise gravity field for the CLIC feasibility studies / Sébastien Guillaume (2015)
PermalinkEmpirical model of the gravitational field generated by the oceanic lithosphere / Robert Tenzer in Advances in space research, vol 55 n° 1 ([01/01/2015])
PermalinkGOCE: assessment of GPS-only gravity field determination / Adrian Jäggi in Journal of geodesy, vol 89 n° 1 (January 2015)
PermalinkGravité de la Terre : des mesures aux modèles, une image de la dynamique interne / Isabelle Panet (2015)
PermalinkGravité de la Terre : des mesures aux modèles, une image de la dynamique interne / Isabelle Panet (2015)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkAnnual crop type classification of the US great plains for 2000 to 20011 / Daniel M. Howard in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS, vol 80 n° 6 (June 2014)
PermalinkPermalinkModélisation numérique du champ de gravité produit par une structure géologique arbitraire / Clément Roussel in XYZ, n° 139 (juin - août 2014)
PermalinkComparison among three harmonic analysis techniques on the sphere and the ellipsoid / Hussein Abd-Elmotaal in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 8 n° 1 (April 2014)
PermalinkGOCE: Probing Earth's interior / Isabelle Panet in Horizon 2020 Projects : Portal, n° 2 (March 2014)
PermalinkGDQM-PL13 – the new gravimetric quasigeoid model for Poland / Malgorzata Szelachowska in Geoinformation issues, vol 6 n° 1 (2014)
PermalinkMapping the mass distribution of Earth's mantle using satellite-derived gravity gradients / Isabelle Panet in Nature geoscience, vol 7 n° 2 (February 2014)
PermalinkComparing seven candidate mission configurations for temporal gravity field retrieval through full-scale numerical simulation / Basem Elsaka in Journal of geodesy, vol 88 n° 1 (January 2014)
PermalinkPermalinkGlobal Earth structure recovery from state-of-the-art models of the Earth’s gravity field and additional geophysical Information / K. Hamayun (2014)
PermalinkUpdating ESA’s Earth System Model for Gravity Mission Simulation Studies, 2. Comparison with the Original Model / I. Bergmann–Wolf (2014)
PermalinkTowards a 1 mGal accuracy and 1 min resolution altimetry gravity field / Lifeng Bao in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 10-12 (October - December 2013)
PermalinkAssessing the precision in loading estimates by geodetic techniques in Southern Europe / Pierre Valty in Geophysical journal international, vol 194 n° 3 (September 2013)
![]()
PermalinkThe static gravity field model DGM-1S from GRACE and GOCE data: computation, validation and an analysis of GOCE mission’s added value / Hassan Hashemi Farahani in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 9 (September 2013)
PermalinkWhat's next for practical ubiquitous navigation ? world models and magnetic field maps / John Raquet in Inside GNSS, vol 8 n° 5 (September - October 2013)
PermalinkCanadian gravimetric geoid model 2010 / Jianliang Huang in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 8 (August 2013)
PermalinkNumerical modelling of post-seismic rupture propagation after the Sumatra 26.12.2004 earthquake constrained by GRACE gravity data / V.O. Mikhailov in Geophysical journal international, vol 194 n° 2 (August 2013)
PermalinkOptimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid / Thomas Grombein in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 7 (July 2013)
PermalinkAnalytical error analysis for satellite gravity field determination based on two-dimensional Fourier method / Lin Cai in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 5 (May 2013)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkEstimation of mass change trends in the Earth’s system on the basis of GRACE satellite data, with application to Greenland / C. Siemes in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 1 (January 2013)
PermalinkPermalinkGlobal height system unification with GOCE: a simulation study on the indirect bias term in the GBVP approach / C. Gerlach in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 1 (January 2013)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkThe height datum problem and the role of satellite gravity models / A. Gatti in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 1 (January 2013)
PermalinkPermalinkNew constraints on the origin of the Hawaiian swell from wavelet analysis of the geoid-to-topography ratio / Cécilia Cadio in Earth and planetary science letters, vol 359–360 (15 December 2012)
PermalinkHigh-frequency signal and noise estimates of CSR GRACE RL04 / J.A. Bonin in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 12 (December 2012)
PermalinkRecent changes of the Earth’s core derived from satellite observations of magnetic and gravity fields / Mioara Mandea in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America PNAS, vol 109 n° 47 (November 2012)
PermalinkOn computing ellipsoidal harmonics using Jekeli’s renormalization / J. Sebera in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 9 (September 2012)
PermalinkReducing errors in the GRACE gravity solutions using regularization / H. Save in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 9 (September 2012)
PermalinkMonitoring GOCE gradiometer calibration parameters using accelerometer and star sensor data: methodology and first results / C. Siemes in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 8 (August 2012)
PermalinkOptimal regularization for geopotential model GOCO02S by Monte Carlo methods and multi-scale representation of density anomalies / Karl Rudolf Koch in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 8 (August 2012)
PermalinkBasic equations for constructing geopotential models from the gravitational potential derivatives of the first and second orders in the terrestrial reference frame / M. Petrovskaya in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 7 (July 2012)
PermalinkSeparation of global time-variable gravity signals into maximally independent components / E. Forootan in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 7 (July 2012)
PermalinkAssessment of the GOCE-based global gravity models in Canada / Elmas Sinem Ince in Geomatica, vol 66 n° 2 (June 2012)
PermalinkChoix d'un modèle géopotentiel global pour la détermination du géoïde en Algérie / N. Rabehi in Bulletin des sciences géographiques, n° 27 (juin 2012)
PermalinkEstimation of the zero-height geopotential level WoLVD in a local vertical datum from inversion of co-located GPS, leveling and geoid heights: a case study in the Hellenic islands / C. Kotsakis in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 6 (June 2012)
PermalinkPermalinkWavelet‐based directional analysis of the gravity field : evidence for large‐scale undulations / M. Hayn in Geophysical journal international, vol 189 n° 3 (June 2012)
PermalinkEstimating geoid height change in North America: past, present and future / T. Jacob in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 5 (May 2012)
PermalinkSimulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE / B. Loomis in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 5 (May 2012)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkDétermination du champ de pesanteur par gradiométrie spatiale [diaporama] / Gwendoline Pajot-Métivier (2012)
PermalinkEntwicklung eines Kalman-Filters zur Bestimmung kurzzeitiger Variationen des Erdschwerefeldes aus daten der Satellitenmission GRACE / E. Kurtenbach (2012)
PermalinkFlexible dataset combination and modelling by domain decomposition approaches / Isabelle Panet (2012)
PermalinkPermalinkGOCE gravitational gradients along the orbit / Johannes Bouman in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 11 (November /2011)
PermalinkMission design, operation and exploitation of the gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer mission / R. Floberghagen in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 11 (November /2011)
PermalinkValidation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons / Thomas Gruber in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 11 (November /2011)
Permalinkvol 85 n° 11 - November /2011 - GOCE - The gravity and steady state-ocean circulation explorer (Bulletin de Journal of geodesy) / International association of geodesy
PermalinkSensitivity of superconducting gravimeters in central Europe on variations in regional river and drainage basins / C. Kroner in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 10 (October 2011)
PermalinkAlternative method for angular rate determination within the GOCE gradiometer processing / C. Stummer in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 9 (September 2011)
PermalinkStrapdown INS/DGPS airborne gravimetry tests in the Gulf of Mexico / X. Li in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 9 (September 2011)
PermalinkGRACE-derived surface water mass anomalies by energy integral approach: application to continental hydrology / Guillaume Ramillien in Journal of geodesy, vol 85 n° 6 (June 2011)
PermalinkPacific geoid anomalies revisited in light of thermochemical oscillating domes in the lower mantle / Cécilia Cadio in Earth and planetary science letters, vol 306 n° 1-2 (June 2011)
PermalinkPermalinkAssessment of systematic errors in the computation of gravity gradients from satellite altimeter data / Johannes Bouman in Marine geodesy, vol 34 n° 2 (April - June 2011)
PermalinkEstimation de la pesanteur terrestre par gravimétrie mobile / B. Li in Bulletin d'information scientifique et technique de l'IGN, n° 77 (avril 2011)
PermalinkEtude géodésique du changement climatique en Méditerranée : première approche / Pierre Valty in Bulletin d'information scientifique et technique de l'IGN, n° 77 (avril 2011)
PermalinkReprésentations en ondelettes du champ de pesanteur / Isabelle Panet in Bulletin d'information scientifique et technique de l'IGN, n° 77 (avril 2011)
PermalinkSignature des séismes dans le champ de pesanteur / Isabelle Panet in Bulletin d'information scientifique et technique de l'IGN, n° 77 (avril 2011)
Permalinkvol 99 n° 2 - 01/04/2011 - Austrian contribution to the XXV [25] general assembly of the International union of geodesy and geophysics (IUGG), [actes], June 27 - July 8, 2011, Melbourne, Australia (Bulletin de VGI, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessung & GeoInformation) / Österreichische Gesellschaft für Vermessung und Geoinformation (Autriche)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkWavelet modelling of the gravity field by domain decomposition methods: an example over Japan / Isabelle Panet in Geophysical journal international, vol 184 n° 1 (January 2011)
![]()
PermalinkIDS contribution to ITRF2008 / Jean-Jacques Valette in Advances in space research, vol 46 n° 12 (15/12/2010)
PermalinkTowards development of a consistent orbit series for TOPEX, Jason-1, and Jason-2 / Franck G. Lemoine in Advances in space research, vol 46 n° 12 (15/12/2010)
PermalinkThe combination of GNSS-levelling data and gravimetric (quasi-) geoid heights in the presence of noise / R. Klees in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 12 (December 2010)
PermalinkA comparison of recent Earth gravitational models with emphasis on their contribution in refining the gravity and geoid at continental or regional scale / D. Arabelos in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 11 (November 2010)
PermalinkThe celestial mechanics approach : theoretical foundations / Gerhard Beutler in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 10 (October 2010)
PermalinkCombining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data / C. Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 9 (September 2010)
PermalinkThe effect of EGM2008-based normal, normal-orthometric and Helmert orthometric height systems on the Australian levelling network / M. Filmer in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 8 (August 2010)
PermalinkEvaluating terrestrial water storage variations from regionally constrained GRACE mascon data and hydrological models over Southern Africa: preliminary results / P. Krogh in International Journal of Remote Sensing IJRS, vol 31 n° 14 (July 2010)
PermalinkCharacterizing long‐time scale hydrological effects on gravity for improved distinction of tectonic signals / Michel Van Camp in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth, Vol 115 n° B7 (July 2010)
![]()
PermalinkGeneration and study of satellite gravity over Gujarat, India and their possible correlation with earthquake occurences / T. Majumba in Geocarto international, vol 25 n° 4 (July 2010)
PermalinkCan mean values of Helmert's gravity anomalies be continued downward directly? / P. Vanicek in Geomatica, vol 64 n° 2 (June 2010)
PermalinkOcean loading effects on the prediction of Antarctic glacial isostatic uplift and gravity rates / K. Simon in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 5 (May 2010)
PermalinkPermalinkConstruction of spherical harmonic series for the potential derivatives of arbitrary orders in the geocentric Earth-fixed reference frame / M. Petrovskaya in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 3 (March 2010)
PermalinkPrediction of vertical deflections from high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis and residual terrain model data / C. Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 3 (March 2010)
PermalinkL'altitude : une question de point de vue / Paul Rebischung in Géomatique expert, n° 73 (01/02/2010)
PermalinkFinite element method for solving geodetic boundary value problems / Z. Faskova in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 2 (February 2010)
PermalinkAssessment of a numerical method for computing the spherical harmonic coefficients of the gravitational potential of a constant density polyhedron / Olivier Jamet (2010)
PermalinkGlobal gravity field determination using the GPS measurements made onboard the low Earth orbiting satellite CHAMP / Lars Prange (2010)
PermalinkIdentification and modelling of sea level change contributors on GRACE satellite gravity data and their applications to climate monitoring / Bert Wouters (2010)
PermalinkNuevo ajuste de la Red Geodésica de Espana (ROI) en altitudes ortométricas / José Antonio Sanchez Sobrino in Topografia y cartografia, vol 27 n° 156 (01/01/2010)
PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkSea surface topography and marine geoid by airborne laser altimetry and shipborne ultrasound altimetry / Philippe Limpach (2010)
PermalinkClassical globally reflected gravity field determination in modern locally oriented multiscale framework / W. Freeden in Journal of geodesy, vol 83 n° 12 (December 2009)
Permalink