Descripteur


Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Determination of the lunar body tide from global laser altimetry data / Robin N. Thor in Journal of geodesy, vol 95 n° 1 (January 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Determination of the lunar body tide from global laser altimetry data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Robin N. Thor, Auteur ; Reinald Kallenbach, Auteur ; Ulrich R. Christensen, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : n° 4 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] altimètre laser
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données altimétriques
[Termes descripteurs IGN] marée lunaire
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Mercure (planète)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] mesure géodésiqueRésumé : (auteur) We use global data from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) to retrieve the lunar tidal Love number ℎ2 and find ℎ2=0.0387±0.0025. This result is in agreement with previous estimates from laser altimetry using crossover points of LOLA profiles. The Love numbers k2 and h2 are key constraints on planetary interior models. We further develop and apply a retrieval method based on a simultaneous inversion for the topography and the tidal signal benefiting from the large volume of LOLA data. By the application to the lunar tides, we also demonstrate the potential of the method for future altimetry experiments at other planetary bodies. The results of this study are very promising with respect to the determination of Mercury’s and Ganymede’s h2 from future altimeter measurements. Numéro de notice : A2021-029 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01455-8 date de publication en ligne : 23/12/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01455-8 Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96712
in Journal of geodesy > vol 95 n° 1 (January 2021) . - n° 4[article]Elevation models for reproducible evaluation of terrain representation / Patrick Kennelly in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol 48 n° 1 (January 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Elevation models for reproducible evaluation of terrain representation Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Patrick Kennelly, Auteur ; Tom Patterson, Auteur ; Bernhard Jenny, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : pp 63 - 77 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Photogrammétrie numérique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] altitude
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données multiéchelles
[Termes descripteurs IGN] figuré du terrain
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle numérique de surface
[Termes descripteurs IGN] réalité de terrain
[Termes descripteurs IGN] relief
[Termes descripteurs IGN] représentation du relief
[Termes descripteurs IGN] reproductibilité
[Termes descripteurs IGN] visualisation de donnéesRésumé : (auteur) This paper proposes elevation models to promote, evaluate, and compare various terrain representation techniques. Our goal is to increase the reproducibility of terrain rendering algorithms and techniques across different scales and landscapes. We introduce elevation models of varying terrain types, available to the user at no cost, with minimal common data imperfections such as missing data values, resampling artifacts, and seams. Three multiscale elevation models are available, each consisting of a set of elevation grids, centered on the same geographic location, with increasing cell sizes and spatial extents. We also propose a collection of single-scale elevation models of archetypal landforms including folded ridges, a braided riverbed, active and stabilized sand dunes, and a volcanic caldera. An inventory of 78 publications with a total of 155 renderings illustrating terrain visualization techniques guided the selection of landform types in the elevation models. The benefits of using the proposed elevation models include straightforward comparison of terrain representation methods across different publications and better documentation of the source data, which increases the reproducibility of terrain representations. Numéro de notice : A2021-719 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : IMAGERIE Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/15230406.2020.1830856 date de publication en ligne : 04/11/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2020.1830856 Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96459
in Cartography and Geographic Information Science > vol 48 n° 1 (January 2021) . - pp 63 - 77[article]Error propagation in regional geoid computation using spherical splines, least-squares collocation, and Stokes’s formula / Vegard Ophaug in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 12 (December 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Error propagation in regional geoid computation using spherical splines, least-squares collocation, and Stokes’s formula Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Vegard Ophaug, Auteur ; Christian Gerlach, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : n° 120 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] altitude
[Termes descripteurs IGN] collocation par moindres carrés
[Termes descripteurs IGN] covariance
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur
[Termes descripteurs IGN] fonction spline
[Termes descripteurs IGN] formule de Stokes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] géoïde local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] propagation d'erreurRésumé : (auteur) Current International Association of Geodesy efforts within regional geoid determination include the comparison of different computation methods in the quest for the “1-cm geoid.” Internal (formal) and external (empirical) approaches to evaluate geoid errors exist, and ideally they should agree. Spherical radial base functions using the spline kernel (SK), least-squares collocation (LSC), and Stokes’s formula are three commonly used methods for regional geoid computation. The three methods have been shown to be theoretically equivalent, as well as to numerically agree on the millimeter level in a closed-loop environment using synthetic noise-free data (Ophaug and Gerlach in J Geod 91:1367–1382, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1030-1PANIST). This companion paper extends the closed-loop method comparison using synthetic data, in that we investigate and compare the formal error propagation using the three methods. We use synthetic uncorrelated and correlated noise regimes, both on the 1-mGal (=10−5 ms−2) level, applied to the input data. The estimated formal errors are validated by comparison with empirical errors, as determined from differences of the noisy geoid solutions to the noise-free solutions. We find that the error propagations of the methods are realistic in both uncorrelated and correlated noise regimes, albeit only when subjected to careful tuning, such as spectral band limitation and signal covariance adaptation. For the SKs, different implementations of the L-curve and generalized cross-validation methods did not provide an optimal regularization parameter. Although the obtained values led to a stabilized numerical system, this was not necessarily equivalent to obtaining the best solution. Using a regularization parameter governed by the agreement between formal and empirical error fields provided a solution of similar quality to the other methods. The errors in the uncorrelated regime are on the level of ∼5 mm and the method agreement within 1 mm, while the errors in the correlated regime are on the level of ∼10 mm, and the method agreement within 5 mm. Stokes’s formula generally gives the smallest error, closely followed by LSC and the SKs. To this effect, we note that error estimates from integration and estimation techniques must be interpreted differently, because the latter also take the signal characteristics into account. The high level of agreement gives us confidence in the applicability and comparability of formal errors resulting from the three methods. Finally, we present the error characteristics of geoid height differences derived from the three methods and discuss them qualitatively in relation to GNSS leveling. If applied to real data, this would permit identification of spatial scales for which height information is preferably derived by spirit leveling or GNSS leveling. Numéro de notice : A2020-784 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : MATHEMATIQUE/POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01443-y date de publication en ligne : 27/11/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01443-y Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96528
in Journal of geodesy > vol 94 n° 12 (December 2020) . - n° 120[article]Self-consistent determination of the Earth’s GM, geocenter motion and figure axis orientation / Alexandre Couhert in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 12 (December 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Self-consistent determination of the Earth’s GM, geocenter motion and figure axis orientation Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Alexandre Couhert, Auteur ; Christian Bizouard, Auteur ; F. Mercier, Auteur ; Kristel Chanard , Auteur ; Marianne Greff-Lefftz, Auteur ; Pierre Exertier, Auteur
Année de publication : 2020 Projets : 1-Pas de projet / Article en page(s) : n° 113 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Ajisai
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Jason
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Lageos
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Lares
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Starlette
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Stella
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données TLS (télémétrie)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur de modèle
[Termes descripteurs IGN] harmonique sphérique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] incertitude géométrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] mouvement du géocentre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] surface de la merRésumé : (auteur) The very low-degree Earth’s gravity coefficients, associated with the largest-scale mass redistribution in the Earth’s fluid envelope (atmosphere, oceans and continental hydrology), are the most poorly known. In particular, the first three degree geopotential terms are important, as they relate to intrinsic Earth’s mass references: gravitational coefficient (GM) of the Earth (degree 0), geocenter motion (degree 1), Earth’s figure axis orientation (degree 2). This paper presents a self-consistent determination of these three properties of the Earth. The main objective is to deal with the remaining sources of altimetry satellite orbit uncertainties affecting the fundamental record of sea surface height measurements. The analysis identifies the modeling errors, which should be mitigated when estimating the geocenter coordinates from Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations. The long-term behavior of the degree-0 and -2 spherical harmonics is also observed over the 34-year period 1984–2017 from the long-time history of satellite laser tracking to geodetic spherical satellites. From the analysis of the evolution of these two coefficients, constraints regarding the Earth’s rheology and uncertainties in the value of GM could be inferred. Overall, the influence of the orbit characteristics, SLR station ranging/position biases and satellite signature effects, measurement modeling errors (tropospheric corrections, non-tidal deformations) are also discussed. Numéro de notice : A2020-330 Affiliation des auteurs : UMR IPGP-Géod+Ext (2020- ) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01450-z date de publication en ligne : 18/11/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01450-z Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96858
in Journal of geodesy > vol 94 n° 12 (December 2020) . - n° 113[article]Optimizing local geoid undulation model using GPS/levelling measurements and heuristic regression approaches / Mosbeh R. Kaloop in Survey review, vol 52 n° 375 (November 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Optimizing local geoid undulation model using GPS/levelling measurements and heuristic regression approaches Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Mosbeh R. Kaloop, Auteur ; Ahmed Zaki, Auteur ; Hamad Al-Ajami, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 544 - 554 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] anomalie de pesanteur
[Termes descripteurs IGN] géoïde local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Koweit
[Termes descripteurs IGN] méthode fondée sur le noyau
[Termes descripteurs IGN] méthode heuristique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] nivellement avec assistance GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] processus gaussien
[Termes descripteurs IGN] régression
[Termes descripteurs IGN] régression multivariée par spline adaptativeRésumé : (auteur) This study investigates to use GPS/Levelling measurements of Kuwait and four heuristic regression methods including Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) for modelling local geoid undulation. The accuracy of the models was compared by geoid undulation of gravitational observations and Global Geopotential Models (GGMs). The results show that the KRR model is suitable for Kuwait geoid model, its error of percentage is 0.018 and 0.124% relative to gravity and GPS/Levelling geoid undulation models, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison of KRR model with GGMs models signifies its accuracy. Numéro de notice : A2020-688 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2019.1665615 date de publication en ligne : 16/09/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1665615 Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96221
in Survey review > vol 52 n° 375 (November 2020) . - pp 544 - 554[article]Local terrain modification method considering physical feature constraints for vector elements / Jiangfeng She in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol 47 n° 5 (September 2020)
PermalinkSize dependency of variables influencing fire occurrence in Mediterranean forests of Eastern Spain / Marina Peris-Llopis in European Journal of Forest Research, vol 139 n°4 (August 2020)
PermalinkBenefits of combining GPS and GLONASS for measuring ocean tide loading displacement / Majid Abbaszadeh in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 7 (July 2020)
PermalinkEvaluations of the significant wave height products of HY-2B satellite radar altimeters / Yongjun Jia in Marine geodesy, Vol 43 n° 4 (July 2020)
PermalinkLong time-series remote sensing analysis of the periodic cycle evolution of the inlets and ebb-tidal delta of Xincun Lagoon, Hainan Island, China / Huaguo Zhang in ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol 165 (July 2020)
PermalinkRethinking error estimations in geospatial data: the correct way to determine product accuracy / Qassim Abdullah in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, PERS, vol 86 n° 7 (July 2020)
PermalinkAltimétrie de précision autour du détroit d'Ormuz : détermination d'un géoïde gravimétrique, d'altitudes orthométriques précises et de la variation du niveau moyen de la mer / Jean-Louis Carme in XYZ, n° 163 (juin 2020)
PermalinkPermalinkValidation of Sentinel-3A SRAL coastal sea level data at high posting rate: 80 Hz / Ana Aldarias in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 58 n° 6 (June 2020)
PermalinkClassifying physiographic regimes on terrain and hydrologic factors for adaptive generalization of stream networks / Lauwrence V. Stanislawski in International journal of cartography, Vol 6 n° 1 (March 2020)
Permalink