Centre dedocumentation
scientifique

Une nouvelle détermination de l'altitude de l'Everest par le Népal et la Chine / Gavin Schrock in XYZ, n° 166 (mars 2021)

Public [article]  inXYZ > n° 166 (mars 2021) . - pp 57 - 67 Titre : Une nouvelle détermination de l'altitude de l'Everest par le Népal et la Chine Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Gavin Schrock, Auteur ; Bernard Flacelière, Auteur Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : pp 57 - 67 Note générale : Bibliographie Cet article est issu des publications “Surveying the head of the Earth touching heaven” de Gavin Schrock et de “Two hours on the summit” de Khim Lal Gautam, avec l'autorisation de Geospatial Media and Communications et des auteurs. Langues : Français (fre) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique [Termes IGN] altitude normale [Termes IGN] antenne GNSS [Termes IGN] Chine [Termes IGN] déformation horizontale de la croute terrestre [Termes IGN] données GNSS [Termes IGN] Everest [Termes IGN] gravimétrie [Termes IGN] Népal [Termes IGN] précision altimétrique [Termes IGN] séisme Résumé : (Auteur) After more than a decade of dispute and controversy, China and Nepal have finally agreed on the altitude of Mount Everest. The highest peak in the world, which lies on Nepal's border with Tibet in the Himalayas, stands at 8,848.86 meters, officials from the two countries announced on December 8, 2020. To relate this human and technique epic, open our columns to Gavin Schrock, consulting editor and land surveyor who interviewed several protagonists and to Khim Lal Gautam, leader of the Nepalese expedition in 2019. Bernard Flacelière, editor-in-chief of XYZ recalls here the forgotten mission of 1992. Numéro de notice : A2021-249 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtSansCL DOI : sans Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97330 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (2)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
112-2021011	SL	Revue	Centre de documentation	Revues en salle	Disponible
112-2021012	SL	Revue	Centre de documentation	Revues en salle	Disponible

Python software tools for GNSS interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR) / Angel Martín in GPS solutions, Vol 24 n° 4 (October 2020)  

Public [article]  inGPS solutions > Vol 24 n° 4 (October 2020) . - 7 p. Titre : Python software tools for GNSS interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR) Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Angel Martín, Auteur ; Raquel Luján, Auteur ; Ana Belén Anquela, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : 7 p. Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale [Termes IGN] antenne GNSS [Termes IGN] format RINEX [Termes IGN] humidité du sol [Termes IGN] Python (langage de programmation) [Termes IGN] rapport signal sur bruit [Termes IGN] réflectométrie par GNSS Résumé : (auteur) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) interferometric reflectometry, also known as the GNSS-IR, uses data from geodetic-quality GNSS antennas to extract information about the environment surrounding the antenna. Soil moisture monitoring is one of the most important applications of the GNSS-IR technique. This manuscript presents the main ideas and implementation decisions needed to write the Python code for software tools that transform RINEX format observation and navigation files into an appropriate format for GNSS-IR (which includes the SNR observations and the azimuth and elevation of the satellites) and to determine the reflection height and the adjusted phase and amplitude values of the interferometric wave for each individual satellite track. The main goal of the manuscript is to share the software with the scientific community to introduce new users to the GNSS-IR technique. Numéro de notice : A2020-523 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-020-01010-0 date de publication en ligne : 20/07/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01010-0 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95696 [article]

GNSS scale determination using calibrated receiver and Galileo satellite antenna patterns / Arturo Villiger in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 9 (September 2020)  

Public [article]  inJournal of geodesy > vol 94 n° 9 (September 2020) . - n° 93 Titre : GNSS scale determination using calibrated receiver and Galileo satellite antenna patterns Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Arturo Villiger, Auteur ; Rolf Dach, Auteur ; Stefan Schaer, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : n° 93 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux [Termes IGN] antenne Galileo [Termes IGN] centre de phase [Termes IGN] chambre anéchoïque [Termes IGN] étalonnage d'instrument [Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame [Termes IGN] métadonnées [Termes IGN] positionnement par ITGB [Termes IGN] positionnement par télémétrie laser sur satellite [Termes IGN] réseau géodésique terrestre [Termes IGN] robot Résumé : (auteur) The reference frame of a global terrestrial network is defined by the origin, the orientation and the scale. The origin of the ITRF2014 is defined by the ILRS long-term solution, the orientation by no-net rotation conditions w.r.t. the previous reference frame (ITRF2008), and the scale by the mean values from global VLBI and SLR solution series (Altamimi et al. in J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:6109–6131, 2016). With the release of the Galileo satellite antenna phase center offsets (PCO) w.r.t. the satellites center of mass (GSA in Galileo IOV and FOC satellite metadata, 2019) and the availability of new ground antenna calibrations for GNSS receivers, based on anechoic chamber measurements or on robot calibrations, GNSS global network solutions qualify to contribute to the scale determination of terrestrial networks, as well. Our analysis is based on global multi-GNSS solutions of the years 2017 and 2018 and may be seen as “proof of concept” for the contribution of GNSS data to the scale determination of the terrestrial reference frame. In a first step, the currently used Galileo PCO estimations (Steigenberger et al. in J Geod 90:773–785, 2016) are compared to the released PCO values, which show discrepancies on the decimeter-level. Eventually, the published Galileo PCOs are used in an experimental solution as known values. GNSS-specific PCOs are estimated, as well, for GPS and GLONASS, together with the “standard” parameters set up in global GNSS solutions. From the estimated network coordinates, a time series of daily scale parameters of the terrestrial network is extracted, which shows an offset of the order of 1 ppb (parts per billion, corresponding to a height difference of 6.4 mm on the Earth’s surface) w.r.t. to the ITRF2014 network and an annual variation with an amplitude of about 0.3 ppb. Numéro de notice : A2020-539 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01417-0 date de publication en ligne : 05/09/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01417-0 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95739 [article]

Antenna phase center correction differences from robot and chamber calibrations: the case study LEIAR25 / Grzegorz Krzan in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)  

Public [article]  inGPS solutions > vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020) Titre : Antenna phase center correction differences from robot and chamber calibrations: the case study LEIAR25 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Grzegorz Krzan, Auteur ; Karol Dawidowicz, Auteur ; Pawel Wielgosz, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale [Termes IGN] antenne GLONASS [Termes IGN] antenne GNSS [Termes IGN] antenne GPS [Termes IGN] centre de phase [Termes IGN] chambre anéchoïque [Termes IGN] correction du signal [Termes IGN] étalonnage d'instrument [Termes IGN] instrumentation Leica [Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS [Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis [Termes IGN] robot [Termes IGN] série temporelle [Termes IGN] signal GNSS Résumé : (auteur) In recent years, the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have been intensively modernized, resulting in the introduction of new carrier frequencies for GPS and GLONASS and the development of new satellite systems such as Galileo and BeiDou (BDS). For this reason, the absolute field antenna calibrations performed so far for the two legacy carrier frequencies, the GPS and GLONASS, seem to be insufficient. Hence, all antennas will require a re-calibration of their phase center variations for the new signals to ensure the highest measurement accuracy. Currently, two absolute calibration methods are used to calibrate GNSS antennas: field calibration using a robot and calibration in an anechoic chamber. Unfortunately, differences in these methodologies also result in a disparity in the obtained antenna phase center corrections (PCC). Therefore, we analyze the differences between individual PCC obtained with these two methods, specifically for the Leica AR-25 antenna model (LEIAR25). In addition, the influence of PCC differences on the GNSS-derived position time series for 19 EUREF Permanent GNSS Network (EPN) stations was also assessed. The results show that the calibration method has a noticeable impact on PCC models. PCC differences determined for the ionosphere-free combination may reach up over 20 mm and can be transferred to the position domain. Further tests concerning the positioning accuracy showed that for horizontal coordinates differences between solutions were mostly below 1 mm, exceeding 2 mm only at two stations for the GLONASS solution. However, the height component differences exceeded 5 mm for four, six and six stations out of 19 for the GPS, GLONASS and Galileo solutions, respectively. These differences are strongly dependent on large L2 calibration differences. Numéro de notice : A2020-081 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 date de publication en ligne : 11/02/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94650 [article]

Evaluation of the high-rate GNSS-PPP method for vertical structural motion / Mosbeh R. Kaloop in Survey review, vol 52 n° 371 (March 2020)  

Public [article]  inSurvey review > vol 52 n° 371 (March 2020) . - pp 159 - 171 Titre : Evaluation of the high-rate GNSS-PPP method for vertical structural motion Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Mosbeh R. Kaloop, Auteur ; Cemal Ozer Yigit, Auteur ; Ahmet Anil Dindar, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 159 - 171 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Navigation et positionnement [Termes IGN] antenne GNSS [Termes IGN] déformation verticale de la croute terrestre [Termes IGN] filtrage du bruit [Termes IGN] ondelette [Termes IGN] positionnement cinématique en temps réel [Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS [Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis [Termes IGN] série temporelle [Termes IGN] traitement de données GNSS Résumé : (auteur) This study aims at the investigation of GNSS-PP method to determine the dynamic characteristics of structures. Cantilever steel bars having lengths of 70, 100 and 120 cm were tested under dynamic excitation. The GNSS was used to measure the natural frequencies and damping values of all the tested cantilever structures. The GNSS data were processed using relative GNSS positioning and PPP methods. The results obtained using these two methods were also compared with the dynamic characteristics obtained by applying the theoretical and finite element (FE) methods. Furthermore, it is investigated the impact of the stable data length before oscillation events on kinematic PPP. The study showed that the maximum difference among the experimental results in terms of natural frequencies proceeded using PPP is 0.08 Hz when compared with the theoretical and FE results. Furthermore, there is no difference between the PPP and relative GNSS positioning in determining the dynamic behaviour of structures eventhough roving GNSS antenna remains motionless for short-time, such as a few-minutes, before an event occurred. Numéro de notice : A2020-080 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2018.1534362 date de publication en ligne : 19/10/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1534362 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94643 [article]

Absolute field calibration for multi-GNSS receiver antennas at ETH Zurich / Daniel Willi in GPS solutions, vol 24 n° 1 (January 2020)  

Permalink

Impact of GPS processing on the estimation of snow water equivalent using refracted GPS signals / Ladina Steiner in IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol 58 n° 1 (January 2020)  

Permalink

Processing of GNSS constellations and ground station networks using the raw observation approach / Sebastian Strasser in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n°7 (July 2019)  

Permalink

Impact of GPS antenna phase center models on zenith wet delay and tropospheric gradients / Yohannes Getachew Ejigu in GPS solutions, vol 23 n° 1 (January 2019)  

Permalink

Validating and comparing GNSS antenna calibrations / Ulla Kallio in Journal of geodesy, vol 93 n° 1 (January 2019)  

Permalink

Periodic signals in a pseudo-kinematic GPS coordinate time series depending on the antenna phase centre model – TRM55971.00 TZGD antenna case study / Karol Dawidowicz in Survey review, vol 49 n° 355 (October 2017)  

Permalink

Multipath detection based on single orthogonal dual linear polarized GNSS antenna / Ke Zhang in GPS solutions, vol 21 n° 3 (July 2017)  

Permalink

GNSS antenna caused near-field interference effect in Precise Point Positioning results / Karol Dawidowicz in Artificial satellites, vol 52 n° 2 (June 2017)  

Permalink

GPS code phase variations (CPV) for GNSS receiver antennas and their effect on geodetic parameters and ambiguity resolution / Tobias Kersten in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 6 (June 2017)  

Permalink

Fast ambiguity resolution for long-range reference station networks with ionospheric model constraint method / Ming Zhang in GPS solutions, vol 21 n° 2 (April 2017)  

Permalink