[article] | Titre : |
Estimating and assessing Galileo satellite fractional cycle bias for PPP ambiguity resolution |
| Type de document : |
Article/Communication |
| Auteurs : |
Guorui Xiao, Auteur ; Pan Li, Auteur ; Lifen Sui, Auteur ; et al., Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2019 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliographie |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Descripteur : |
[Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] ambiguïté entière
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes descripteurs IGN] résolution d'ambiguïté
|
| Résumé : |
(Auteur) Due to the rapid deployment of the Galileo constellation, Galileo is now able to contribute to GNSS precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR) with 17 operational satellites as of December 2017. We estimate the satellite fractional cycle bias (FCB) based on globally distributed MGEX stations and assess the Galileo FCB quality by a comparison with that of GPS and BDS. Results of 60 days indicate that the quality of Galileo wide-lane (WL) FCB is better than GPS and BDS in terms of data usage rate, residual distribution, as well as standard deviation of daily estimates. The RMS of Galileo WL FCB residuals is 0.071 cycles, while that of GPS and BDS are 0.089 and 0.117 cycles, respectively. The standard deviation of Galileo daily WL FCB is 0.010 cycles, while that of GPS and BDS is 0.018 and 0.043 cycles. We attribute the better quality of Galileo WL FCB to its signal modulation, AltBOC, which significantly compresses the multipath effect for pseudorange measurement. Within the Galileo constellation, the performance of In-Orbit Validation (IOV) satellites WL FCB is worse than that of Full Operational Capability (FOC) satellites as a result of a reduction in the power of the transmitted signal. The performance of the two highly eccentric satellites is comparable to other FOC satellites. The overall quality of Galileo narrow-lane (NL) FCB is slightly worse than that of GPS but better than that of BDS. The RMS of Galileo NL FCB residuals is 0.062 cycles, while that for GPS and BDS is 0.050 and 0.086 cycles respectively. In addition, the NL FCB quality of FOC, IOV (except E19), as well as the two eccentric satellites, shows no significant difference in terms of data usage rates and residuals. Galileo PPP AR solutions are conducted at 20 MGEX stations with 3-h sessions for 10 days. The positional biases of AR solutions are 0.7, 0.6, and 2.1 cm for east, north and up components respectively, while those for float solutions are 2.1, 1.1, and 2.7 cm, corresponding to the improvements of 67, 45, and 22%, respectively. These results demonstrate that, currently, Galileo FCB can be estimated with accuracy comparable with GPS and BDS, and the Galileo observations can bring an obvious benefit to ambiguity-fixed PPP. |
| Numéro de notice : |
A2019-057 |
| Thématique : |
POSITIONNEMENT |
| Nature : |
Article |
| nature-HAL : |
ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern |
| DOI : |
10.1007/s10291-018-0793-z |
| date de publication en ligne : |
19/10/2018 |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0793-z |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
URL Article |
| Permalink : |
https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92086 |
in GPS solutions > vol 23 n° 1 (January 2019)
[article]
|
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesExperimental results of multipath behavior for GPS L1-L2 and Galileo E1-E5b in static and kinematic scenarios in Journal of applied geodesy, Vol 13 n° 4 (October 2019)
