Descripteur
Termes descripteurs IGN > sciences naturelles > sciences de la Terre et de l'univers > géosciences > géophysique interne > géodésie > géodésie physique > pesanteur terrestre > modèle de géopotentiel > Earth Gravity Model 2008
Earth Gravity Model 2008Synonyme(s)EGM08 EGM2008Voir aussi |



Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Using real polar ground gravimetry data to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery / Biao Lu in Journal of geodesy, Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Using real polar ground gravimetry data to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Biao Lu, Auteur ; Christoph Förste, Auteur ; Franz Barthelmes, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] anomalie de pesanteur
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Antarctique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Arctique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] champ de gravitation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GOCE
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GRACE
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes descripteurs IGN] filtrage d'information
[Termes descripteurs IGN] levé gravimétrique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] zone polaireRésumé : (auteur) With the successful completion of European Space Agency (ESA)’s PolarGAP campaign, ground gravity data are now available for both polar regions. Therefore, it is now possible to solve the GOCE polar gap problem in satellite-only gravity field recovery by using additional polar ground gravity data instead of some regularization methods. However, ground gravimetry data need to be filtered to remove the short-wavelength information beyond a certain harmonic degree to avoid spectral leakage when inferring satellite-only gravity field models. For the Arctic, the ArcGP data set was successfully applied when inferring the high-resolution gravity field model EGM2008 which could be used for this filtering there. For Antarctica, a combination of latest airborne gravimetry data from ESA’s PolarGap campaign and some previous gravity data was recently published which was irregularly distributed in space and still had some small gaps within the GOCE south polar gap. Therefore, we proposed a point mass modeling method for this filtering which was similar to the way using EGM2008 for such filtering to the ground gravity data in the Arctic. Furthermore, a variance component estimation was applied to combine the normal equations from the different sources to build a global gravity field model called IGGT_R1C. Then, this model’s accuracy was evaluated by comparison with other gravity field models in terms of difference degree amplitudes, gravity anomaly differences as well as external checking by obit adjustment and gravity data in the GOCE polar gap areas. This gravity field model performed well globally according to these checking results; especially, the RMS of the residuals between the filtered gravity data and that calculated from IGGT_R1C was the smallest (2.6 mGal in the Arctic and 5.4 mGal in Antarctica) compared with that of the relevant satellite-only gravity field models, e.g., GOCO05s. Therefore, the disturbing impact of the GOCE polar data gap problem could be solved by adding the polar ground gravity data. Numéro de notice : A2020-155 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01361-z date de publication en ligne : 25/02/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01361-z Format de la ressource électronique : url article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94805
in Journal of geodesy > Vol 94 n°3 (March 2020)[article]Precise local quasigeoid modelling using GNSS/levelling height anomalies and gravity data / Marek Trojanowicz in Survey review, Vol 52 n°370 (January 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Precise local quasigeoid modelling using GNSS/levelling height anomalies and gravity data Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Marek Trojanowicz, Auteur ; Edward Osada, Auteur ; Krzysztof Karsznia, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : pp 76 - 83 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] collocation par moindres carrés
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données géophysiques
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur en altitude
[Termes descripteurs IGN] fonction spline d'interpolation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] formule de Molodensky
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle numérique de surface
[Termes descripteurs IGN] nivellement
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Pologne
[Termes descripteurs IGN] quasi-géoïdeRésumé : (auteur) This study compares four approaches of local quasigeoid modelling using GNSS/levelling height anomalies. The first two approaches utilise only a dense network of points with known GNSS/levelling height anomalies and the EGM2008 model. They are based on the interpolation of residual values of height anomalies by applying the least squares collocation (LSC) and the thin plate spline (TPS). The next two approaches use additional data in the form of surface gravity data and the digital elevation model. One of these approaches is based on the classical Molodensky method combined with LSC. The other approach utilises the method of geophysical gravity data inversion (GGI). During the research, the authors used a local network of points with precisely defined GNSS/levelling height anomalies located in South-Western Poland. They obtained comparable results for all tested approaches at the maximum analysed density of GNSS/levelling points (about 1point30km2). The differences between the modelling results became apparent only with an increase in the distance between the GNSS/levelling data points and the reduced accuracy of the used global geopotential model. Numéro de notice : A2020-027 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2018.1525981 date de publication en ligne : 10/10/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1525981 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94479
in Survey review > Vol 52 n°370 (January 2020) . - pp 76 - 83[article]Toward a global horizontal and vertical elastic load deformation model derived from GRACE and GNSS station position time series / Kristel Chanard in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth, vol 123 n° 4 (April 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Toward a global horizontal and vertical elastic load deformation model derived from GRACE and GNSS station position time series Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Kristel Chanard , Auteur ; Luce Fleitout, Auteur ; Eric Calais, Auteur ; Paul Rebischung
, Auteur ; Jean-Philippe Avouac, Auteur
Année de publication : 2018 Projets : 3-projet - voir note / Article en page(s) : pp 3225 - 3237 Note générale : bibliographie
The project was funded by NSF grant EAR 1345136, the Laboratoire de Recherche Commun “Yves Rocard” (ENS‐CEA‐CNRS), and CNRS/TOSCA grant 2925.Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] coordonnées GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] déformation horizontale de la croute terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] déformation verticale de la croute terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GRACE
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] harmonique sphérique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de déformation tectonique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] mouvement du géocentre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] série temporelleRésumé : (Auteur) We model surface displacements induced by variations in continental water, atmospheric pressure, and non‐tidal oceanic loading, derived from the Gravity and Recovery Climate Experiment (GRACE) for spherical harmonic degrees two and higher. As they are not observable by GRACE, we use at first the degree‐1 spherical harmonic coefficients from (Swenson2008estimating). We compare the predicted displacements with the position time series of 689 globally distributed continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations. While GNSS vertical displacements are well explained by the model at a global scale, horizontal displacements are systematically underpredicted and out‐of‐phase with GNSS station position time series. We then re‐estimate the degree‐1 deformation field from a comparison between our GRACE‐derived model, with no a priori degree‐1 loads, and the GNSS observations. We show that this approach reconciles GRACE‐derived loading displacements and GNSS station position time series at a global scale, particularly in the horizontal components. Assuming that they reflect surface loading deformation only, our degree‐1 estimates can be translated into geocenter motion time series. We also address and assess the impact of systematic errors in GNSS station position time series at the Global Positioning System (GPS) draconitic period and its harmonics on the comparison between GNSS and GRACE‐derived annual displacements. Our results confirm that surface mass redistributions observed by GRACE, combined with an elastic spherical and layered Earth model, can be used to provide first order corrections for loading deformation observed in both horizontal and vertical components of GNSS station position time series. Numéro de notice : A2018-055 Affiliation des auteurs : LaSTIG LAREG+Ext (2012-mi2018) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1002/2017JB015245 date de publication en ligne : 21/02/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015245 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=89382
in Journal of geophysical research : Solid Earth > vol 123 n° 4 (April 2018) . - pp 3225 - 3237[article]Kriging and moving window kriging on a sphere in geometric (GNSS/levelling) geoid modelling / M. Ligas in Survey review, vol 50 n° 359 (March 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Kriging and moving window kriging on a sphere in geometric (GNSS/levelling) geoid modelling Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : M. Ligas, Auteur ; M. Kulczycki, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : pp 155 - 162 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Etats-Unis
[Termes descripteurs IGN] géoïde local
[Termes descripteurs IGN] krigeageRésumé : (auteur) A comparison of kriging and moving window kriging (MWK) on a sphere is performed on GNSS/levelling data. The study was to give the answer on whether there is a significant gain in prediction accuracy when we apply an MWK instead of ‘classical’ kriging and also to what extent the use of global geopotential model EGM2008 improves prediction. The quality of prediction for all kriging and data variants has been investigated on three regions (being on the territory of the conterminous USA) characterised with a different spatial extent and density of sampling. Numerical tests revealed that in case of high-sampling density there was no accuracy gain when using MWK instead of classical kriging (cK). In contrast, for less numerous datasets and a much larger spatial extent (low-sampling density) MWK adapts itself to data much better than cK. Incorporation of EGM2008-based undulations as a long-wavelength trend for both cases (classical and moving window) significantly improved prediction quality. Numéro de notice : A2018-181 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2016.1247131 date de publication en ligne : 09/11/2016 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2016.1247131 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=89825
in Survey review > vol 50 n° 359 (March 2018) . - pp 155 - 162[article]The relation between degree-2160 spectral models of Earth’s gravitational and topographic potential : a guide on global correlation measures and their dependency on approximation effects / Christian Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 10 (October 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The relation between degree-2160 spectral models of Earth’s gravitational and topographic potential : a guide on global correlation measures and their dependency on approximation effects Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Christian Hirt, Auteur ; Moritz Rexer, Auteur ; Sten Claessens, Auteur ; Reiner Rummel, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 1179 – 1205 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie physique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] corrélation
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Earth Gravity Model 2008
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle de géopotentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] potentiel de pesanteur terrestreRésumé : (Auteur) Comparisons between high-degree models of the Earth’s topographic and gravitational potential may give insight into the quality and resolution of the source data sets, provide feedback on the modelling techniques and help to better understand the gravity field composition. Degree correlations (cross-correlation coefficients) or reduction rates (quantifying the amount of topographic signal contained in the gravitational potential) are indicators used in a number of contemporary studies. However, depending on the modelling techniques and underlying levels of approximation, the correlation at high degrees may vary significantly, as do the conclusions drawn. The present paper addresses this problem by attempting to provide a guide on global correlation measures with particular emphasis on approximation effects and variants of topographic potential modelling. We investigate and discuss the impact of different effects (e.g., truncation of series expansions of the topographic potential, mass compression, ellipsoidal versus spherical approximation, ellipsoidal harmonic coefficient versus spherical harmonic coefficient (SHC) representation) on correlation measures. Our study demonstrates that the correlation coefficients are realistic only when the model’s harmonic coefficients of a given degree are largely independent of the coefficients of other degrees, permitting degree-wise evaluations. This is the case, e.g., when both models are represented in terms of SHCs and spherical approximation (i.e. spherical arrangement of field-generating masses). Alternatively, a representation in ellipsoidal harmonics can be combined with ellipsoidal approximation. The usual ellipsoidal approximation level (i.e. ellipsoidal mass arrangement) is shown to bias correlation coefficients when SHCs are used. Importantly, gravity models from the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM) are inherently based on this approximation level. A transformation is presented that enables a transformation of ICGEM geopotential models from ellipsoidal to spherical approximation. The transformation is applied to generate a spherical transform of EGM2008 (sphEGM2008) that can meaningfully be correlated degree-wise with the topographic potential. We exploit this new technique and compare a number of models of topographic potential constituents (e.g., potential implied by land topography, ocean water masses) based on the Earth2014 global relief model and a mass-layer forward modelling technique with sphEGM2008. Different to previous findings, our results show very significant short-scale correlation between Earth’s gravitational potential and the potential generated by Earth’s land topography (correlation +0.92, and 60% of EGM2008 signals are delivered through the forward modelling). Our tests reveal that the potential generated by Earth’s oceans water masses is largely unrelated to the geopotential at short scales, suggesting that altimetry-derived gravity and/or bathymetric data sets are significantly underpowered at 5 arc-min scales. We further decompose the topographic potential into the Bouguer shell and terrain correction and show that they are responsible for about 20 and 25% of EGM2008 short-scale signals, respectively. As a general conclusion, the paper shows the importance of using compatible models in topographic/gravitational potential comparisons and recommends the use of SHCs together with spherical approximation or EHCs with ellipsoidal approximation in order to avoid biases in the correlation measures. Numéro de notice : A2017-541 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-017-1016-z En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1016-z Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=86596
in Journal of geodesy > vol 91 n° 10 (October 2017) . - pp 1179 – 1205[article]TotalStation/GNSS/EGM integrated geocentric positioning method / Edward Osada in Survey review, vol 49 n° 354 (September 2017)
PermalinkProblems and methods of calculating the Legendre functions of arbitrary degree and order / Elena Novikova in Geodesy and cartography, vol 65 n° 2 (December 2016)
PermalinkUtilization of high-resolution EGM2008 gravity data for geological exploration over the Singhbhum-Orissa Craton, India / S.K. Pal in Geocarto international, vol 31 n° 7 - 8 (July - August 2016)
PermalinkAccuracy of unmodified Stokes’ integration in the R-C-R procedure for geoid computation / Zahra Ismaïl in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 9 n° 2 (June 2015)
PermalinkGeological mapping of Jharia Coalfield, India using GRACE EGM2008 gravity data : a vertical derivative approach / Jitendra Vaish in Geocarto international, vol 30 n° 3 - 4 (March - April 2015)
PermalinkComparison among three harmonic analysis techniques on the sphere and the ellipsoid / Hussein Abd-Elmotaal in Journal of applied geodesy, vol 8 n° 1 (April 2014)
PermalinkThe height datum problem and the role of satellite gravity models / A. Gatti in Journal of geodesy, vol 87 n° 1 (January 2013)
PermalinkOn computing ellipsoidal harmonics using Jekeli’s renormalization / J. Sebera in Journal of geodesy, vol 86 n° 9 (September 2012)
PermalinkPermalinkA comparison of recent Earth gravitational models with emphasis on their contribution in refining the gravity and geoid at continental or regional scale / D. Arabelos in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 11 (November 2010)
PermalinkCombining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data / C. Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 9 (September 2010)
PermalinkThe effect of EGM2008-based normal, normal-orthometric and Helmert orthometric height systems on the Australian levelling network / M. Filmer in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 8 (August 2010)
PermalinkConstruction of spherical harmonic series for the potential derivatives of arbitrary orders in the geocentric Earth-fixed reference frame / M. Petrovskaya in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 3 (March 2010)
PermalinkPrediction of vertical deflections from high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis and residual terrain model data / C. Hirt in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 3 (March 2010)
PermalinkFinite element method for solving geodetic boundary value problems / Z. Faskova in Journal of geodesy, vol 84 n° 2 (February 2010)
PermalinkNuevo ajuste de la Red Geodésica de Espana (ROI) en altitudes ortométricas / José Antonio Sanchez Sobrino in Topografia y cartografia, vol 27 n° 156 (01/01/2010)
PermalinkEl nuevo modelo de Geoide para España EGM08-REDNAP / José Antonio Sanchez Sobrino in Topografia y cartografia, vol 26 n° 155 (01/12/2009)
PermalinkA study reference frame consistency in recent Earth gravitational models / C. Kotsakis in Journal of geodesy, vol 83 n° 1 (January 2009)
Permalink