Descripteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesEtendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
GNSS scale determination using calibrated receiver and Galileo satellite antenna patterns / Arturo Villiger in Journal of geodesy, vol 94 n° 9 (September 2020)
Titre : GNSS scale determination using calibrated receiver and Galileo satellite antenna patterns Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Arturo Villiger, Auteur ; Rolf Dach, Auteur ; Stefan Schaer, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : n° 93 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] centre de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] chambre anéchoïque
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage d'instrument
[Termes descripteurs IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes descripteurs IGN] métadonnées
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par ITGB
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par télémétrie laser sur satellite
[Termes descripteurs IGN] réseau géodésique terrestre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] robotRésumé : (auteur) The reference frame of a global terrestrial network is defined by the origin, the orientation and the scale. The origin of the ITRF2014 is defined by the ILRS long-term solution, the orientation by no-net rotation conditions w.r.t. the previous reference frame (ITRF2008), and the scale by the mean values from global VLBI and SLR solution series (Altamimi et al. in J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:6109–6131, 2016). With the release of the Galileo satellite antenna phase center offsets (PCO) w.r.t. the satellites center of mass (GSA in Galileo IOV and FOC satellite metadata, 2019) and the availability of new ground antenna calibrations for GNSS receivers, based on anechoic chamber measurements or on robot calibrations, GNSS global network solutions qualify to contribute to the scale determination of terrestrial networks, as well. Our analysis is based on global multi-GNSS solutions of the years 2017 and 2018 and may be seen as “proof of concept” for the contribution of GNSS data to the scale determination of the terrestrial reference frame. In a first step, the currently used Galileo PCO estimations (Steigenberger et al. in J Geod 90:773–785, 2016) are compared to the released PCO values, which show discrepancies on the decimeter-level. Eventually, the published Galileo PCOs are used in an experimental solution as known values. GNSS-specific PCOs are estimated, as well, for GPS and GLONASS, together with the “standard” parameters set up in global GNSS solutions. From the estimated network coordinates, a time series of daily scale parameters of the terrestrial network is extracted, which shows an offset of the order of 1 ppb (parts per billion, corresponding to a height difference of 6.4 mm on the Earth’s surface) w.r.t. to the ITRF2014 network and an annual variation with an amplitude of about 0.3 ppb. Numéro de notice : A2020-539 Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-020-01417-0 date de publication en ligne : 05/09/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01417-0 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=95739
in Journal of geodesy > vol 94 n° 9 (September 2020) . - n° 93[article]
Titre : Antenna phase center correction differences from robot and chamber calibrations: the case study LEIAR25 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Grzegorz Krzan, Auteur ; Karol Dawidowicz, Auteur ; Pawel Wielgosz, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GLONASS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] centre de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] chambre anéchoïque
[Termes descripteurs IGN] correction du signal
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage d'instrument
[Termes descripteurs IGN] instrumentation Leica
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes descripteurs IGN] robot
[Termes descripteurs IGN] série temporelle
[Termes descripteurs IGN] signal GNSSRésumé : (auteur) In recent years, the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have been intensively modernized, resulting in the introduction of new carrier frequencies for GPS and GLONASS and the development of new satellite systems such as Galileo and BeiDou (BDS). For this reason, the absolute field antenna calibrations performed so far for the two legacy carrier frequencies, the GPS and GLONASS, seem to be insufficient. Hence, all antennas will require a re-calibration of their phase center variations for the new signals to ensure the highest measurement accuracy. Currently, two absolute calibration methods are used to calibrate GNSS antennas: field calibration using a robot and calibration in an anechoic chamber. Unfortunately, differences in these methodologies also result in a disparity in the obtained antenna phase center corrections (PCC). Therefore, we analyze the differences between individual PCC obtained with these two methods, specifically for the Leica AR-25 antenna model (LEIAR25). In addition, the influence of PCC differences on the GNSS-derived position time series for 19 EUREF Permanent GNSS Network (EPN) stations was also assessed. The results show that the calibration method has a noticeable impact on PCC models. PCC differences determined for the ionosphere-free combination may reach up over 20 mm and can be transferred to the position domain. Further tests concerning the positioning accuracy showed that for horizontal coordinates differences between solutions were mostly below 1 mm, exceeding 2 mm only at two stations for the GLONASS solution. However, the height component differences exceeded 5 mm for four, six and six stations out of 19 for the GPS, GLONASS and Galileo solutions, respectively. These differences are strongly dependent on large L2 calibration differences. Numéro de notice : A2020-081 Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 date de publication en ligne : 11/02/2020 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0957-5 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94650
in GPS solutions > vol 24 n° 2 (April 2020)[article]
Titre : Absolute field calibration for multi-GNSS receiver antennas at ETH Zurich Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Daniel Willi, Auteur ; Simon Lutz, Auteur ; Elmar Brockmann, Auteur ; Markus Rothacher, Auteur Année de publication : 2020 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] centre de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données multicapteurs
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage au sol
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage d'instrument
[Termes descripteurs IGN] étalonnage des données
[Termes descripteurs IGN] international GPS service for geodynamics
[Termes descripteurs IGN] mesurage de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] récepteur GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] robot
[Termes descripteurs IGN] signal GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Zurich (Suisse)Résumé : (Auteur) ETH Zurich developed an absolute GNSS antenna calibration system based on measurements taken in the field. An industrial robot is used to rotate and tilt the antenna to be calibrated. This procedure ensures good coverage of the antenna hemisphere and reduces systematic errors. The calibration system at ETH Zurich is validated by a direct comparison of the obtained calibrations with calibrations from the anechoic chamber method (University of Bonn) and from another absolute field calibration method (Geo++® GmbH). Calibrations by ETH Zurich agree on the sub-millimeter level with both reference calibrations. A second validation was conducted using real measurements on short baselines. Data were acquired on four stations in direct vicinity and processed using different phase center correction models. The experiment shows that individual corrections of ETH Zurich reduce the residuals in the coordinate domain when compared to type-mean calibrations of the International GNSS Service (IGS). However, residual biases between GPS and Galileo coordinates remain. These biases are efficiently reduced when using the new type-mean calibrations from the IGS that include calibration values for all GNSS, including Galileo. The ETH Zurich calibration system is proven to deliver meaningful calibrations that agree with other calibrations on the millimeter level in the azimuth and elevation domain. The field validation shows evidence that the consistency of the Galileo and GPS calibration should be further enhanced by performing a combined GPS and Galileo analysis, which is not yet implemented. Numéro de notice : A2020-020 Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-019-0941-0 date de publication en ligne : 19/12/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0941-0 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=94460
in GPS solutions > vol 24 n° 1 (January 2020)[article]
Titre : Galileo and QZSS precise orbit and clock determination using new satellite metadata Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Xingxing Li, Auteur ; Yongqiang Yuan, Auteur ; Jiande Huang, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : pp 1123 - 1136 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Capacité opérationnelle totale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] centre de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] constellation Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données satellitaires
[Termes descripteurs IGN] GIOVE (satellite)
[Termes descripteurs IGN] horloge du satellite
[Termes descripteurs IGN] lacet
[Termes descripteurs IGN] métadonnées
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle d'orbite
[Termes descripteurs IGN] orbite précise
[Termes descripteurs IGN] orbitographie
[Termes descripteurs IGN] Quasi-Zenith Satellite System
[Termes descripteurs IGN] rayonnement solaire
[Termes descripteurs IGN] variance d'AllanRésumé : (auteur) During 2016–2018, satellite metadata/information including antenna parameters, attitude laws and physical characteristics such as mass, dimensions and optical properties were released for Galileo and QZSS (except for the QZS-1 optical coefficients). These metadata are critical for improving the accuracy of precise orbit and clock determination. In this contribution, we evaluate the benefits of these new metadata to orbit and clock in three aspects: the phase center offsets and variations (PCO and PCV), the yaw-attitude model and solar radiation pressure (SRP) model. The updating of Galileo PCO and PCV corrections, from the values estimated by Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt and Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum to the chamber calibrations disclosed by new metadata, has only a slight influence on Galileo orbits, with overlap differences within only 1 mm. By modeling the yaw attitude of Galileo satellites and QZS-2 spacecraft (SVN J002) according to new published attitude laws, the residuals of ionosphere-free carrier-phase combinations can be obviously decreased in yaw maneuver seasons. With the new attitude models, the 3D overlap RMS in eclipse seasons can be decreased from 12.3 cm, 14.7 cm, 16.8 cm and 34.7 cm to 11.7 cm, 13.4 cm, 15.8 cm and 32.9 cm for Galileo In-Orbit Validation (IOV), Full Operational Capability (FOC), FOC in elliptical orbits (FOCe) and QZS-2 satellites, respectively. By applying the a priori box-wing SRP model with new satellite dimensions and optical coefficients, the 3D overlap RMS are 5.3 cm, 6.2 cm, 5.3 cm and 16.6 cm for Galileo IOV, FOCe, FOC and QZS-2 satellites, with improvements of 11.0%, 14.7%, 14.0% and 13.8% when compared with the updated Extended CODE Orbit Model (ECOM2). The satellite laser ranging (SLR) validation reveals that the a priori box-wing model has smaller mean biases of − 0.4 cm, − 0.4 cm and 0.6 cm for Galileo FOCe, FOC and QZS-2 satellites, while a slightly larger mean bias of − 1.0 cm is observed for Galileo IOV satellites. Moreover, the SLR residual dependencies of Galileo IOV and FOC satellites on the elongation angle almost vanish when the a priori box-wing SRP model is applied. As for satellite clocks, a visible bump appears in the Modified Allan deviation at integration time of 20,000 s for Galileo Passive Hydrogen Maser with ECOM2, while it almost vanishes when the a priori box-wing SRP model and new metadata are applied. The standard deviations of clock overlap can also be significantly reduced by using new metadata. Numéro de notice : A2019-383 Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-019-01230-4 date de publication en ligne : 02/02/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01230-4 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=93462
in Journal of geodesy > vol 93 n° 8 (August 2019) . - pp 1123 - 1136[article]
Titre : Impact of GPS antenna phase center models on zenith wet delay and tropospheric gradients Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Yohannes Getachew Ejigu, Auteur ; Addisu Hunegnaw, Auteur ; Kibrom Ebuy Abraha, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] antenne GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] centre de phase
[Termes descripteurs IGN] données GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] gradient de troposphère
[Termes descripteurs IGN] retard troposphérique zénithal
[Termes descripteurs IGN] teneur intégrée en vapeur d'eau
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (Auteur) Today Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) tropospheric products, such as zenith total delays (ZTD) and zenith wet delays (ZWD), are widely used as complementary data sets in numerical weather prediction models. In particular, the wet delays are treated as unknown parameters in GNSS processing and are estimated with other parameters such as station coordinates. In this study, we investigate the effects of Phase Center Correction (PCC) models on ZWD, integrated water vapor (IWV) and horizontal gradients derived from Global Positioning System (GPS) observations. Two solutions were generated using the GAMIT software over the European Reference Frame (EUREF) Permanent GNSS Network (EPN). The first (reference) solution was derived by applying the International GNSS Service (IGS) type-mean PCC models, while for the second solution PCC models from individual calibrations were used. The solutions were generated identically, except for the PCC model differences. The tropospheric products from the two solutions were then compared, with the assumption that common signals would be differenced out. The comparison of the two solutions clearly shows a bias in all tropospheric products, which can be attributed to PCC model deficiencies. Overall, mean biases of 1.8, 0.3, 0.14 and 0.19 mm are evident in ZWD, IWV, North–South and East–West gradients, respectively. Moreover, the differences between the two solutions show seasonal variations. For all antenna types, the ZWD and IWV differences are dominated by white plus power-law noise, with the latter characterizing the low-frequency spectrum. On the other hand, the horizontal gradients exhibit a white plus first-order autoregressive noise characteristic with less than 1% white noise. The individual PCC model provides a better fit to an external independent model in terms of gradient estimates and also provides up to 3% more carrier phase integer ambiguity resolution. Numéro de notice : A2019-056 Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-018-0796-9 date de publication en ligne : 25/10/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0796-9 Format de la ressource électronique : URL Article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92085
in GPS solutions > vol 23 n° 1 (January 2019)[article]PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalink
