Descripteur
Termes IGN > 1-Candidats > combinaison au niveau des observations
combinaison au niveau des observations |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (8)



Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
The international DORIS service contribution to ITRF2020 / Guilhem Moreaux in Advances in space research, vol inconnu (2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The international DORIS service contribution to ITRF2020 Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Guilhem Moreaux, Auteur ; Franck G. Lemoine, Auteur ; Hugues Capdeville, Auteur ; Michiel Otten, Auteur ; Petr Štěpánek, Auteur ; Jérôme Saunier , Auteur ; Pascale Ferrage, Auteur
Année de publication : 2023 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] combinaison au niveau des observations
[Termes IGN] DORIS
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] mouvement du pôleRésumé : (autuer) For the realization of the 2020 International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2020), the International DORIS Service delivered to the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) a set of 1456 weekly solution files from 1993.0 to 2021.0 including station coordinates and Earth orientation parameters (EOPs). The data come from fourteen DORIS satellites: TOPEX/Poseidon, SPOT-2, SPOT-3, SPOT-4, SPOT-5, Envisat, Jason-1, Jason-2, Cryosat-2, Saral, HY-2A, Jason-3, Sentinel-3A and Sentinel-3B. In their processing, the four analysis centers which contributed to the DORIS combined solution used the latest time variable gravity models, the new mean pole and diurnal-subdiurnal tidal EOP models recommended by IERS. In addition, all the analysis centers included in their processing precise SPOT-5 solar panel angle values and quaternions for, at least, the Jason satellites. Furthermore, a new Alcatel phase center variation model was implemented for the ITRF2020 processing. The main objective of this study is to present the combination process and to analyze the impact of the new modeling on the performance of the new combined solution. Comparisons with the IDS contribution to ITRF2014 show that i) the application of the new phase center variations for the Alcatel DORIS ground antennas in the data processing combined with the gradual replacement over time of the Alcatel by Starec antennas implies a scale drift from 1993.0 to 2002.5 and ii) thanks to a better modeling of the surface forces on the satellites, the new combined solution shows smaller annual and 118-day signals in the geocenter. A new DORIS terrestrial reference frame was computed to evaluate the intrinsic quality of the new combined solution. That evaluation shows that over almost the full time span the intrinsic IDS scale values lie in a range of mm. After mid-2008, the new DORIS reference frame has an internal position consistency in North-East-Up better than 7.5 mm. Numéro de notice : A2023-083 Affiliation des auteurs : IGN+Ext (2020- ) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2022.07.012 Date de publication en ligne : 15/07/2022 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.07.012 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=101349
in Advances in space research > vol inconnu (2023)[article]DPOD2014 : A new DORIS extension of ITRF2014 for precise orbit determination / Guilhem Moreaux in Advances in space research, vol 63 n° 1 (1 January 2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : DPOD2014 : A new DORIS extension of ITRF2014 for precise orbit determination Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Guilhem Moreaux, Auteur ; Pascal Willis , Auteur ; Franck G. Lemoine, Auteur ; Nikita P. Zelensky, Auteur ; Alexandre Couhert, Auteur ; Hanane Ait Lakbir, Auteur ; Pascale Ferrage, Auteur
Année de publication : 2019 Projets : 1-Pas de projet / Article en page(s) : pp 118 - 138 Note générale : Bibliographie
financement partiel par le CNESLangues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Systèmes de référence et réseaux
[Termes IGN] combinaison au niveau des observations
[Termes IGN] déformation de la croute terrestre
[Termes IGN] données altimétriques
[Termes IGN] données DORIS
[Termes IGN] Groenland
[Termes IGN] International Terrestrial Reference Frame
[Termes IGN] orbitographie
[Termes IGN] rebond post-glaciaire
[Termes IGN] séisme
[Termes IGN] série temporelle
[Termes IGN] vitesseRésumé : (Auteur) To support precise orbit determination of the altimetry missions, the International DORIS Service (IDS) regularly estimates the DPOD (DORIS terrestrial reference frame for Precise Orbit Determination) solution which includes mean positions and velocities of all the DORIS stations. This solution is aligned to the current realization of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) and so, can be seen as a DORIS extension of the ITRF. In 2016, moving to the IDS Combination Center, the DPOD construction scheme changed. The new DPOD solution is produced from a DORIS cumulative position and velocity solution. We present the new methodology used to compute DPOD2014 and its validation procedure. In order to present geophysical applications and interpretations of these results, we show two examples: (1) the Gorkha earthquake (M7.8 – April 2015) generates a 3-D mis-positioning of nearly 55 mm of the EVEB DORIS station at the Everest base camp 90 km from the epicenter. (2) Applying the results the DPOD2014 realization, we show that the most recent vertical velocity of Thule, Greenland is similar to that observed between 2006 and 2010, indicating further ongoing ice mass loss in the Thule region of northwest Greenland. Numéro de notice : A2019-118 Affiliation des auteurs : Géodésie+Ext (mi2018-2019) Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2018.08.043 Date de publication en ligne : 03/09/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.08.043 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92643
in Advances in space research > vol 63 n° 1 (1 January 2019) . - pp 118 - 138[article]Estimation and analysis of Galileo differential code biases / Min Li in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 3 (March 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Estimation and analysis of Galileo differential code biases Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Min Li, Auteur ; Yunbin Yuan, Auteur ; Ningbo Wang, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 279 - 293 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes IGN] combinaison au niveau des observations
[Termes IGN] constellation Galileo
[Termes IGN] données Galileo
[Termes IGN] données GPS
[Termes IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes IGN] estimation statistique
[Termes IGN] Galileo en mode différentiel
[Termes IGN] mesurage de pseudo-distance
[Termes IGN] récepteur bifréquence
[Termes IGN] récepteur GNSS
[Termes IGN] signal GalileoMots-clés libres : Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) Résumé : (Auteur) When sensing the Earth’s ionosphere using dual-frequency pseudorange observations of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), the satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs) account for one of the main sources of error. For the Galileo system, limited knowledge is available about the determination and characteristic analysis of the satellite and receiver DCBs. To better understand the characteristics of satellite and receiver DCBs of Galileo, the IGGDCB (IGG, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Wuhan, China) method is extended to estimate the satellite and receiver DCBs of Galileo, with the combined use of GPS and Galileo observations. The experimental data were collected from the Multi-GNSS Experiment network, covering the period of 2013–2015. The stability of both Galileo satellite and receiver DCBs over a time period of 36 months was thereby analyzed for the current state of the Galileo system. Good agreement of Galileo satellite DCBs is found between the IGGDCB-based DCB estimates and those from the German Aerospace Center (DLR), at the level of 0.22 ns. Moreover, high-level stability of the Galileo satellite DCB estimates is obtained over the selected time span (less than 0.25 ns in terms of standard deviation) by both IGGDCB and DLR algorithms. The Galileo receiver DCB estimates are also relatively stable for the case in which the receiver hardware device stays unchanged. It can also be concluded that the receiver DCB estimates are rather sensitive to the change of the firmware version and that the receiver antenna type has no great impact on receiver DCBs. Numéro de notice : A2017-066 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-016-0962-1 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0962-1 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84294
in Journal of geodesy > vol 91 n° 3 (March 2017) . - pp 279 - 293[article]Performance analysis of precise point positioning using multi-constellation GNSS : GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou / Mahmoud Abd Rabbou in Survey review, vol 49 n° 352 (March 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Performance analysis of precise point positioning using multi-constellation GNSS : GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Mahmoud Abd Rabbou, Auteur ; Ahmed El-Rabbany, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 39 - 50 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes IGN] combinaison au niveau des observations
[Termes IGN] performance
[Termes IGN] positionnement par BeiDou
[Termes IGN] positionnement par Galileo
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GLONASS
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes IGN] positionnement statique
[Termes IGN] précision du positionnement
[Termes IGN] simple différenceRésumé : (Auteur) We developed a new GNSS PPP model, which combines the observations of GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou satellite navigation systems for precise applications. Both undifferenced and between-satellite single-difference (BSSD) ionosphere-free GNSS PPP models are developed. The contribution of the new GNSS observations is assessed compared with the existing GPS and GPS/GLONASS PPP using three-hours GNSS static data positioning results for several GNSS stations and four consecutive days. Inter-system biases between GPS and other GNSS systems are obtained as additional unknowns in the developed PPP filter. The results indicate that both GPS and GPS/Galileo PPP present comparable positioning accuracy level, which is attributed to the limited number of Galileo satellites. The additional BeiDou observations enhances the positioning accuracy after 15 minutes by 5 cm, 4 cm and 9 cm in latitude, longitude and altitude, respectively compared with GPS only positioning accuracy. However, the BeiDou only PPP results present less accurate positioning accuracy compared with the GPS only PPP. The multi-constellation GNSS PPP enhances the positioning accuracy by 8 cm, 6 cm and 11 cm in latitude, longitude and altitude, respectively compared with the GPS PPP results. Compared with the undifferenced PPP results, the BSSD model enhances the positioning accuracy after 15 minutes for the different GNSS constellations based PPP. The GPS/Galileo PPP positioning accuracy improves by 30%, 27% and 10% in latitude, longitude and altitude, respectively and the GPS/BeiDou PPP positioning accuracy, enhances by 17%, 22% and 15% in latitude, longitude and altitude, respectively while the multi-constellation GNSS PPP positioning accuracy improves by 22% and 15% in latitude and altitude, respectively over the undifferenced PPP technique. Additionally, the BSSD model is found to be superior with respect to the convergence times for the different GNSS combinations based PPP over the traditional undifferenced PPP model. Numéro de notice : A2017-058 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article DOI : 10.1080/00396265.2015.1108068 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2015.1108068 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84266
in Survey review > vol 49 n° 352 (March 2017) . - pp 39 - 50[article]Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou / Pan Li in Journal of geodesy, vol 91 n° 1 (January 2017)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Pan Li, Auteur ; Xiaohong Zhang, Auteur ; Fei Guo, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp 25 - 40 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Navigation et positionnement
[Termes IGN] combinaison au niveau des observations
[Termes IGN] erreur systématique
[Termes IGN] fractional cycle bias
[Termes IGN] positionnement par BeiDou
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes IGN] résolution d'ambiguïté
[Termes IGN] simple différenceRésumé : (Auteur) This paper focuses on the contribution of the global positioning system (GPS) and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations to precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR). A GPS + BDS fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation method and a PPP AR model were developed using integrated GPS and BDS observations. For FCB estimation, the GPS + BDS combined PPP float solutions of the globally distributed IGS MGEX were first performed. When integrating GPS observations, the BDS ambiguities can be precisely estimated with less than four tracked BDS satellites. The FCBs of both GPS and BDS satellites can then be estimated from these precise ambiguities. For the GPS + BDS combined AR, one GPS and one BDS IGSO or MEO satellite were first chosen as the reference satellite for GPS and BDS, respectively, to form inner-system single-differenced ambiguities. The single-differenced GPS and BDS ambiguities were then fused by partial ambiguity resolution to increase the possibility of fixing a subset of decorrelated ambiguities with high confidence. To verify the correctness of the FCB estimation and the effectiveness of the GPS + BDS PPP AR, data recorded from about 75 IGS MGEX stations during the period of DOY 123-151 (May 3 to May 31) in 2015 were used for validation. Data were processed with three strategies: BDS-only AR, GPS-only AR and GPS + BDS AR. Numerous experimental results show that the time to first fix (TTFF) is longer than 6 h for the BDS AR in general and that the fixing rate is usually less than 35 % for both static and kinematic PPP. An average TTFF of 21.7 min and 33.6 min together with a fixing rate of 98.6 and 97.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively, can be achieved for GPS-only ambiguity fixing. For the combined GPS + BDS AR, the average TTFF can be shortened to 16.9 min and 24.6 min and the fixing rate can be increased to 99.5 and 99.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively. Results also show that GPS + BDS PPP AR outperforms single-system PPP AR in terms of convergence time and position accuracy. Numéro de notice : A2017-059 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-016-0935-4 En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0935-4 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84267
in Journal of geodesy > vol 91 n° 1 (January 2017) . - pp 25 - 40[article]PermalinkPermalinkPermalink