Descripteur
|
Termes descripteurs IGN > 1- Candidats > erreur systématique inter-systèmes
erreur systématique inter-systèmes |
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesEtendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Influence of stochastic modeling for inter-system biases on multi-GNSS undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning / Feng Zhou in GPS solutions, vol 23 n° 3 (July 2019)
Titre : Influence of stochastic modeling for inter-system biases on multi-GNSS undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Feng Zhou, Auteur ; Danan Dong, Auteur ; Xin Li, Auteur ; Harald Schuh, Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Navigation et positionnement
[Termes descripteurs IGN] bruit blanc
[Termes descripteurs IGN] décalage d'horloge
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique inter-systèmes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] estimation statistique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] modèle stochastique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement ponctuel précisRésumé : (auteur) The focus of this study is on proper modeling of the dynamics for inter-system biases (ISBs) in multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) precise point positioning (PPP) processing. First, the theoretical derivation demonstrates that the ISBs originate from not only the receiver-dependent hardware delay differences among different GNSSs but also the receiver-independent time differences caused by the different clock datum constraints among different GNSS satellite clock products. Afterward, a comprehensive evaluation of the influence of ISB stochastic modeling on undifferenced and uncombined PPP performance is conducted, i.e., random constant, random walk process, and white noise process are considered. We use data based on a 1-month period (September 2017) Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) precise orbit and clock products from four analysis centers (CODE, GFZ, CNES, and WHU) and 160 MGEX tracking stations. The results demonstrate that generally, the positioning performance of PPP in terms of convergence time and positioning accuracy with the final products from CODE, CNES, and WHU is comparable among the three ISB handling schemes. However, estimating ISBs as random walk process or white noise process outperforms that as the random constant when using the GFZ products. These results indicate that the traditional estimation of ISBs as the random constant may not always be reasonable in multi-GNSS PPP processing. To achieve more reliable positioning results, it is highly recommended to consider the ISBs as random walk process or white noise process in multi-GNSS PPP processing. Numéro de notice : A2019-199 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-019-0852-0 date de publication en ligne : 09/04/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0852-0 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92654
in GPS solutions > vol 23 n° 3 (July 2019)[article]
Titre : Multi-dimensional particle filter-based estimation of inter-system phase biases for multi-GNSS real-time integer ambiguity resolution Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Yumiao Tian, Auteur ; Zhizhao Liu, Auteur ; Frank Neitzel, Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : pp 1073 - 1087 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] ambiguïté entière
[Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse multidimensionnelle
[Termes descripteurs IGN] constellation GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique inter-systèmes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] filtre
[Termes descripteurs IGN] phase GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] précision du positionnement
[Termes descripteurs IGN] résolution d'ambiguïté
[Termes descripteurs IGN] temps réel
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (auteur) In multi-GNSS integration, fixing inter-system double-difference ambiguities to integers is still a challenge due to the existence of inter-system biases (ISB) when mixed types of GNSS receivers are used. It has been shown that when ISB is known, the inter-system ambiguities can be fixed and the reliability of ambiguity fixing can be improved significantly, especially under poor conditions when the number of observed satellites is small. In traditional methods, the intra-system ambiguity is fixed first; then, the ISB is estimated to ultimately fix the inter-system ambiguity. In our work, we use the particle filter-based method to estimate the ISB parameter and fix the inter-system ambiguities to integers at the same time. This method shows higher reliability and higher ambiguity fixing rate. Nevertheless, the existing particle filter approach for ISB parameter estimation is a one-dimensional algorithm. When satellites from three or more systems are observed, there are two or more ISB parameters. We extend the current one-dimensional particle filter approach to multi-dimensional case and estimate multi-ISB parameters in this study. We first present a multi-dimensional particle filter approach that can estimate multi-ISB parameters simultaneously. We also show that the RATIO values can be employed to judge the quality of multi-dimensional ISB values. Afterward, a two-dimensional particle filter approach is taken as an example to validate this approach. For example, in the experiment of GPS L5, Galileo E5a and QZSS L5 integration with 6 satellites using the IGS baseline SIN0-SIN1, only three ambiguities are resolved to integer when the ISBs are unknown. The integer ambiguity fixing rate is 41.0% with 53% of the ambiguity-fixed solutions having positioning errors larger than 3 cm. However, when our approach is adopted, the number of integer ambiguity parameters increases to five. The integer ambiguity fixing rate increases to 99.7% with 100% of ambiguity-fixed solutions having positioning errors smaller than 3 cm. Numéro de notice : A2019-359 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s00190-018-01226-6 date de publication en ligne : 29/01/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-01226-6 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=93427
in Journal of geodesy > vol 93 n°7 (July 2019) . - pp 1073 - 1087[article]
Titre : Assessing the latest performance of Galileo-only PPP and the contribution of Galileo to Multi-GNSS PPP Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Fengyu Xiu, Auteur ; Shirong Ye, Auteur ; Pengfei Xia, Auteur ; Lewen Zhao, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : pp 2784 - 2795 Note générale : bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] constellation Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique inter-systèmes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] GalileoSat
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement cinématique
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par Galileo
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GLONASS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes descripteurs IGN] précision du positionnement
[Termes descripteurs IGN] résidu
[Termes descripteurs IGN] trajet multiple
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSRésumé : (auteur) By the end of 2016, the Galileo constellation had 4 in-orbit validation (IOV) satellites and 14 full operational capability (FOC) satellites, 17 of which were able to transmit signal in November 2017. Galileo has already had early operational capability (EOC). To assess the latest performance of the Galileo-only precise point positioning (PPP) and the contribution of Galileo to the Multi-GNSS PPP solutions, observations collected at 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations over ten days are used to realize the various PPP cases. The statistical results show that the three-dimensional positioning accuracy of Galileo static and kinematic PPP can reach centimeter level and decimeter level after convergence, respectively. The contribution of Galileo can improve the positioning accuracy by 29.49%, 29.96% and 23.70% for GPS kinematic PPP and 11.03%, 10.59% and 11.07% for GPS/GLONASS kinematic PPP solutions in the north, east and up components, respectively. The average convergence time can be reduced by 45.48% for GPS-only kinematic PPP and by 11.04% for GPS/GLONASS solutions by adding Galileo observations. Moreover, adding Galileo observations shortens the average convergence time by 30.45% and 7.8% for GPS-only and GPS/GLONASS static PPP solutions, respectively. Although the convergent positioning results of GPS and GPS/GLONASS static PPP solutions after the addition of Galileo measurements do not demonstrate as significant improvement as those of the kinematic PPP solutions, the positioning accuracy of the GPS/Galileo static PPP solutions compared to the GPS-only static PPP still demonstrates an improvement of approximately 25% on the east component. Furthermore, the GPS/Galileo internal system time bias (ISB) and observation residual are analyzed. The results show that the noise level of the GPS L1/L2 signals and the negative impact of multipath errors on the GPS pseudo-range observations for the L1/L2 signals are greater than those of Galileo E1/E5a signals, resulting in the residuals of GPS ionosphere-free code observations larger than those of Galileo code observations. However, the phase observation residuals of GPS and Galileo are of the same magnitude. Additionally, the one-day GPS/Galileo ISB is quite stable. Its stability described by standard deviation is approximately 0.34 ns. Numéro de notice : A2019-397 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1016/j.asr.2018.06.008 date de publication en ligne : 28/06/2019 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.06.008 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=93508
in Advances in space research > vol 63 n° 9 (1 May 2019) . - pp 2784 - 2795[article]
Titre : Accounting for the differential inter-system bias (DISB) of code observation in GPS+BDS positioning Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Xiang Cao, Auteur ; Qing Wang, Auteur ; Chengfa Gao, Auteur ; Jie Zhang, Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : pp 63 - 68 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Vedettes matières IGN] Géodésie spatiale
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique inter-systèmes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] mesurage de pseudo-distance
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement différentiel
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par BeiDou
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement par GPS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] temps réelRésumé : (Auteur) If the associated differential inter-system biases (DISBs) are priori known, only one common reference satellite is sufficient, which is called the inter-system model. The inter-system model can help to maximize the redundancy of the positioning model, and thus can improve the positioning performance, especially in harsh environment. However, in practice use not all receivers can be calibrated with DISBs in advance. In this paper, taking combined GPS and BDS pseudorange positioning as the example, we compare three positioning models and their positioning performance. One is traditional intra-system model, and the other two belongs to the inter-system models, i. e. the model with calibration of DISB and the model with real-time estimation of DISB parameter. Positioning performance using the three models is evaluated with simulated obstructed environments. It will be shown that besides the model with calibration of DISB, the model with real-time estimation of DISB parameter can also effectively improve positioning accuracy and reliability compared with the traditional intra-system model, especially for the severely obstructed environment with only a few satellites observed. When no more than 7 satellites visible, the positioning accuracies in each directions can be improved by no less than 15 %. The proposed model can be used alternatively when no priori DISB calibration is available. Numéro de notice : A2019-135 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1515/jag-2018-0025 date de publication en ligne : 30/08/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2018-0025 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92465
in Journal of applied geodesy > vol 13 n° 1 (January 2019) . - pp 63 - 68[article]
Titre : Evaluation of three ionospheric delay computation methods for ground-based GNSS receivers Type de document : Article/Communication Auteurs : Liang Chen, Auteur ; Wenting Yi, Auteur ; Weiwei Song, Auteur ; Chuang Shi, Auteur ; Yidong Lou, Auteur ; Cheng Cao, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Note générale : Bibliographie Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteur : [Termes descripteurs IGN] analyse comparative
[Termes descripteurs IGN] erreur systématique inter-systèmes
[Termes descripteurs IGN] positionnement ponctuel précis
[Termes descripteurs IGN] récepteur GNSS
[Termes descripteurs IGN] retard ionosphèrique
[Vedettes matières IGN] Traitement de données GNSSMots-clés libres : carrier-to-code leveling (CCL) method ionospheric-free Hatch–Melbourne–Wubbena (HMW) function Résumé : (Auteur) GNSS observables for ionospheric estimation are commonly based on carrier-to-code leveling (CCL) and precise point positioning (PPP) methods. The CCL method is a geometry-free method which uses carrier phase to level pseudorange observation for decreasing multipath error and observation noise. However, the ionospheric observable based on the CCL has been proven to be affected by leveling errors. The leveling errors are caused by pseudorange multipath and intraday variation of receiver DCB. To obtain more accurate ionospheric observable, the PPP method takes advantage of precise satellite-to-ground range for retrieving slant total electron content and is less affected by the leveling errors. Previous studies have only proven that the ionospheric observables extracted by the two methods are affected by the leveling errors. The influence on ionospheric observable by the pseudorange inter-receiver satellite bias (IRSB) of the receiver has not been taken into consideration. Also, the magnitude of the differences between the ionospheric observables extracted by the two methods has also not been given. In this work, three methods, namely, the CCL, the conventional ionospheric-free PPP method which uses the ionospheric-free Hatch–Melbourne–Wubbena (HMW) function, and the University of Calgary (UOFC) PPP method, are selected to analyze and compare the differences of ionospheric observables and the global ionospheric maps, using a large number of measured data from international GNSS service global stations. Experimental results show that the accuracy of ionospheric observables obtained by the three methods is not only related to the leveling error, but also pseudorange IRSB. The IRSB of the receiver exerts a major effect on the ionospheric observables obtained by the CCL method and a minor effect on the ionospheric observables obtained by the HMW and UOFC methods. The accuracies in the latter case are similar and superior to those obtained by the CCL. The differences of the ionospheric observables obtained by the CCL and UOFC methods, or the CCL and HMW methods, are at decimeter level, whereas the difference of the ionospheric observables obtained by the UOFC and HMW methods is at centimeter level. The UOFC method presented the highest single-frequency pseudorange positioning accuracy using estimated global ionospheric products, followed by the HMW and the CCL methods which presented the lowest positioning accuracy. Numéro de notice : A2018-376 Affiliation des auteurs : non IGN Thématique : POSITIONNEMENT Nature : Article nature-HAL : ArtAvecCL-RevueIntern DOI : 10.1007/s10291-018-0788-9 date de publication en ligne : 01/10/2018 En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0788-9 Format de la ressource électronique : URL article Permalink : https://documentation.ensg.eu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90780
in GPS solutions > vol 22 n° 4 (October 2018)[article]PermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalinkPermalink
